Entheseal pain of levator ani muscle: A novel etiology in chronic pelvic pain and lower urinary tract symptoms-A urodynamic perspective.

IF 2.4
Meng-Hsu Tsai, Hong Ci Lim, Kuan-Cheng Lin, Hung-Yen Chin
{"title":"Entheseal pain of levator ani muscle: A novel etiology in chronic pelvic pain and lower urinary tract symptoms-A urodynamic perspective.","authors":"Meng-Hsu Tsai, Hong Ci Lim, Kuan-Cheng Lin, Hung-Yen Chin","doi":"10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although evidence suggests that levator ani muscle (LAM) entheseal pain is a novel etiology of chronic pelvic pain (CPP), its association with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) remains underexplored. This study examined the urodynamic manifestations of LUTS in patients with LAM entheseal pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort, women with chronic pelvic pain (CPP) and LUTS underwent standardized palpation and were divided into three groups: an isolated LAM muscular pain, an isolated LAM entheseal pain, and a combined muscle and entheseal pain group. Between-group differences in symptom prevalence and urodynamic parameters were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 307 female patients were enrolled. Enthesis-related pain groups exhibited significantly higher prevalences of urinary symptoms, including urinary frequency (muscle pain, n = 81 vs entheseal pain, n = 32 vs combined pain, n = 194: 82.7% vs 87.5% vs 85.1%, p = 0.011), residual urinary sensation (46.9% vs 65.6% vs 63.4%, p < 0.001), and painful bladder symptoms (45.7% vs 59.4% vs 61.9%, p < 0.001). Additionally, these groups demonstrated significantly higher rates of pain-related comorbidities, including bearing-down sensation (33.3% vs 37.5% vs 49.0%, p < 0.001), dysmenorrhea (22.2% vs 25.0% vs 35.1%, p < 0.001), irritable bowel syndrome (29.6% vs 32.4% vs 44.3%, p < 0.001), and systemic myofascial pain (28.4% vs 40.6% vs 52.6%, p < 0.001). However, direct comparison between isolated muscular and entheseal pain groups revealed no significant differences in LUTS or pain comorbidities, whereas combined pain group demonstrated the highest symptom prevalence. Notably, no significant intergroup differences were observed in urodynamic parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LAM entheseal pain represents a distinct, clinically palpable entity in CPP. Its urodynamic similarity to myofascial pain suggests that LUTS reflect a shared final pathway of central sensitization rather than peripheral structural dysfunction. Moreover, its unique association with morning stiffness supports a divergent pathophysiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":94115,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA","volume":" ","pages":"212-219"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13004201/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although evidence suggests that levator ani muscle (LAM) entheseal pain is a novel etiology of chronic pelvic pain (CPP), its association with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) remains underexplored. This study examined the urodynamic manifestations of LUTS in patients with LAM entheseal pain.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort, women with chronic pelvic pain (CPP) and LUTS underwent standardized palpation and were divided into three groups: an isolated LAM muscular pain, an isolated LAM entheseal pain, and a combined muscle and entheseal pain group. Between-group differences in symptom prevalence and urodynamic parameters were analyzed.

Results: A total of 307 female patients were enrolled. Enthesis-related pain groups exhibited significantly higher prevalences of urinary symptoms, including urinary frequency (muscle pain, n = 81 vs entheseal pain, n = 32 vs combined pain, n = 194: 82.7% vs 87.5% vs 85.1%, p = 0.011), residual urinary sensation (46.9% vs 65.6% vs 63.4%, p < 0.001), and painful bladder symptoms (45.7% vs 59.4% vs 61.9%, p < 0.001). Additionally, these groups demonstrated significantly higher rates of pain-related comorbidities, including bearing-down sensation (33.3% vs 37.5% vs 49.0%, p < 0.001), dysmenorrhea (22.2% vs 25.0% vs 35.1%, p < 0.001), irritable bowel syndrome (29.6% vs 32.4% vs 44.3%, p < 0.001), and systemic myofascial pain (28.4% vs 40.6% vs 52.6%, p < 0.001). However, direct comparison between isolated muscular and entheseal pain groups revealed no significant differences in LUTS or pain comorbidities, whereas combined pain group demonstrated the highest symptom prevalence. Notably, no significant intergroup differences were observed in urodynamic parameters.

Conclusion: LAM entheseal pain represents a distinct, clinically palpable entity in CPP. Its urodynamic similarity to myofascial pain suggests that LUTS reflect a shared final pathway of central sensitization rather than peripheral structural dysfunction. Moreover, its unique association with morning stiffness supports a divergent pathophysiology.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

提肛肌的肠内疼痛:慢性盆腔疼痛和下尿路症状的新病因-尿动力学的观点。
背景:新出现的证据表明提肛肌(LAM)腹膜痛是一种新的病因,但其与下尿路症状(LUTS)的关系仍未得到充分探讨。本研究探讨LAM骨膜痛患者LUTS的尿动力学表现。方法:在这个回顾性队列中,慢性盆腔疼痛(CPP)和LUTS的女性进行了标准化的触诊,并分为三组:孤立的LAM肌肉疼痛,孤立的LAM腹膜疼痛,肌肉和腹膜联合疼痛。比较两组患者的症状患病率和综合尿动力学参数。结果:共纳入307例患者。尿路疼痛相关组的尿路症状发生率明显较高,包括尿频率(肌肉疼痛,n = 81 vs.尿路疼痛,n = 32 vs.合并疼痛,n = 194: 82.7% vs. 87.5% vs. 85.1%, p = 0.011)、残留尿感(46.9% vs. 65.6% vs. 63.4%, p < 0.001)和膀胱疼痛症状(45.7% vs. 59.4% vs. 61.9%, p < 0.001)。此外,这些组显示出明显更高的疼痛相关合并症发生率,包括压抑感(33.3%比37.5%比49.0%,p < 0.001)、痛经(22.2%比25.0%比35.1%,p < 0.001)、肠易激综合征(29.6%比32.4%比44.3%,p < 0.001)和全身肌筋膜疼痛(28.4%比40.6%比52.6%,p < 0.001)。然而,直接比较孤立的肌肉疼痛组和肌腱束疼痛组在LUTS或疼痛合并症方面没有显著差异,而联合疼痛组表现出最高的症状患病率。值得注意的是,尿动力学参数在组间无显著差异。结论:本研究表明LAM骨骺痛在CPP中是一种独特的、临床可触及的实体。尿动力学评估无法将其与肌筋膜疼痛区分开来,这表明相关的LUTS可能反映了一个共同的中枢致敏的最终途径,而不是周围结构功能障碍。它与晨僵的关联进一步支持了不同的病理生理学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书