Bridging the Research Gap: Assessing the Impact of a Scalable, Required Applied Research Course for Second-Year Student Pharmacists

IF 3.1 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Alexandra Perez, Jesus Sanchez, Silvia Rabionet
{"title":"Bridging the Research Gap: Assessing the Impact of a Scalable, Required Applied Research Course for Second-Year Student Pharmacists","authors":"Alexandra Perez,&nbsp;Jesus Sanchez,&nbsp;Silvia Rabionet","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2026.101939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study evaluated the effectiveness of Evidence-Based Practice 4 (EBP4): Introduction to Data Analytics, a required 1-semester course for second-year student pharmacists, in providing structured training in cross-sectional medication-use study design and execution using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey dataset, data analysis with IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, and results interpretation. Its assessment examined its impact on learning, skills, confidence, and course satisfaction, as well as postcourse research engagement.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Course impact was evaluated over 3 years (2022–2025) using multiple measures. Knowledge acquisition was measured with 6 proctored quizzes; applied research skills were measured through 4 graded group assignments; and confidence and satisfaction were captured through end-of-course surveys. Long-term impact was assessed through graduating student surveys conducted 2 years postcourse.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Over 90% of students demonstrated learning related to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey design, dataset structure, and the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences tasks. All student groups successfully completed and submitted every required project component across 3 consecutive course offerings. End-of-course surveys indicated that over 90% of students reported confidence in conducting most research activities, and more than 75% reported that the course exceeded expectations. Two-year follow-up surveys found that at least 73% of graduates engaged in 1 or more related research activities, with over 80% crediting EBP4 as helpful or very helpful preparation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>EBP4 built foundational research competencies, fostered student confidence and satisfaction, and supported long-term research engagement, offering a scalable model to enhance research training in pharmacy curricula.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":"90 3","pages":"Article 101939"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002945926000136","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study evaluated the effectiveness of Evidence-Based Practice 4 (EBP4): Introduction to Data Analytics, a required 1-semester course for second-year student pharmacists, in providing structured training in cross-sectional medication-use study design and execution using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey dataset, data analysis with IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, and results interpretation. Its assessment examined its impact on learning, skills, confidence, and course satisfaction, as well as postcourse research engagement.

Methods

Course impact was evaluated over 3 years (2022–2025) using multiple measures. Knowledge acquisition was measured with 6 proctored quizzes; applied research skills were measured through 4 graded group assignments; and confidence and satisfaction were captured through end-of-course surveys. Long-term impact was assessed through graduating student surveys conducted 2 years postcourse.

Results

Over 90% of students demonstrated learning related to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey design, dataset structure, and the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences tasks. All student groups successfully completed and submitted every required project component across 3 consecutive course offerings. End-of-course surveys indicated that over 90% of students reported confidence in conducting most research activities, and more than 75% reported that the course exceeded expectations. Two-year follow-up surveys found that at least 73% of graduates engaged in 1 or more related research activities, with over 80% crediting EBP4 as helpful or very helpful preparation.

Conclusions

EBP4 built foundational research competencies, fostered student confidence and satisfaction, and supported long-term research engagement, offering a scalable model to enhance research training in pharmacy curricula.
弥合研究差距:评估可扩展的影响,二年级学生药剂师所需的应用研究课程。
目的:本研究评估循证实践4 (EBP4):数据分析导论(一学期的药学二年级必修课程)在使用国家健康与营养检查调查数据集、IBM SPSS数据分析和结果解释提供横断面药物使用研究设计和执行的结构化培训方面的有效性。其评估考察了其对学习、技能、信心和课程满意度以及课后研究参与的影响。方法:采用多种方法评估三年(2022-2025)的课程影响。知识获取是通过六次监考测验来衡量的;应用研究技能通过四个分级小组作业来衡量;而信心和满意度则是通过课程结束后的调查获得的。通过课程结束后两年的毕业生调查来评估长期影响。结果:超过90%的学生展示了与NHANES设计、数据集结构和SPSS任务相关的学习。所有学生小组都成功地完成并提交了三个连续课程中每个要求的项目组成部分。课程结束后的调查显示,超过90%的学生对进行大多数研究活动有信心,超过75%的学生认为课程超出了预期。两年的随访调查发现,至少73%的毕业生从事一项或多项相关研究活动,超过80%的毕业生认为EBP4是有用或非常有用的准备。结论:EBP4建立了基础研究能力,培养了学生的信心和满意度,并支持长期的研究参与,为加强药学课程的研究培训提供了一个可扩展的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
15.20%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors. After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书