Presenting Features Audiovisually Improves Working Memory for Bindings.

IF 2.3 Q1 Psychology
Journal of Cognition Pub Date : 2026-01-27 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.5334/joc.481
Nora Turoman, Elodie Walter, Anaë Motz, Laura-Isabelle Klatt
{"title":"Presenting Features Audiovisually Improves Working Memory for Bindings.","authors":"Nora Turoman, Elodie Walter, Anaë Motz, Laura-Isabelle Klatt","doi":"10.5334/joc.481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It has long been known that presenting information to multiple senses at a time (e.g., audiovisual presentation as opposed to only visual or auditory) improves later recall of said information - an effect known as the bimodal advantage. Surprisingly however, evidence for this has come only from studies employing free and serial recall, where the identity of an object is recalled, but not in cued recall, where one object feature is recalled when another one is cued. This is despite both tasks requiring binding features into an object in working memory (WM) - our brain's capacity-limited system for temporarily maintaining information for the purpose of achieving behavioral goals. The present study investigated this discrepancy across a series of four experiments. Contrary to the literature, and despite near-identical task settings, we found evidence in favor of a bimodal advantage across multiple experiments. Moreover, our results suggest that this advantage mainly arises from perceptual processes at encoding rather than from storage in an audiovisual fashion in WM. Finally, a primarily perceptually-based process, the bimodal advantage appears to be sensitive to the characteristics of the cue feature (i.e., its presentation modality). In sum, our results shed light on the mechanism of the bimodal advantage, now robustly detected in cued recall tasks, furthering our understanding of the relationship between perception and WM. Results are discussed in relation to prior studies that did not find a bimodal advantage, potential mechanisms underlying the effect, and the broader framework of the multicomponent model of WM.</p>","PeriodicalId":32728,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognition","volume":"9 1","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12857621/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It has long been known that presenting information to multiple senses at a time (e.g., audiovisual presentation as opposed to only visual or auditory) improves later recall of said information - an effect known as the bimodal advantage. Surprisingly however, evidence for this has come only from studies employing free and serial recall, where the identity of an object is recalled, but not in cued recall, where one object feature is recalled when another one is cued. This is despite both tasks requiring binding features into an object in working memory (WM) - our brain's capacity-limited system for temporarily maintaining information for the purpose of achieving behavioral goals. The present study investigated this discrepancy across a series of four experiments. Contrary to the literature, and despite near-identical task settings, we found evidence in favor of a bimodal advantage across multiple experiments. Moreover, our results suggest that this advantage mainly arises from perceptual processes at encoding rather than from storage in an audiovisual fashion in WM. Finally, a primarily perceptually-based process, the bimodal advantage appears to be sensitive to the characteristics of the cue feature (i.e., its presentation modality). In sum, our results shed light on the mechanism of the bimodal advantage, now robustly detected in cued recall tasks, furthering our understanding of the relationship between perception and WM. Results are discussed in relation to prior studies that did not find a bimodal advantage, potential mechanisms underlying the effect, and the broader framework of the multicomponent model of WM.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

以视听方式呈现功能可以改善绑定的工作记忆。
人们早就知道,一次将信息呈现给多种感官(例如,视听呈现,而不是仅仅视觉或听觉)可以提高后来对所述信息的回忆——这种效应被称为双峰优势。然而,令人惊讶的是,这方面的证据只来自于使用自由回忆和连续回忆的研究,在这些研究中,对象的身份被回忆起来,而不是在线索回忆中,当另一个对象的特征被提示时,一个对象的特征被回忆起来。尽管这两项任务都需要将特征绑定到工作记忆(WM)中的对象中,这是我们大脑容量有限的系统,用于暂时保存信息以实现行为目标。本研究通过一系列的四个实验来调查这种差异。与文献相反,尽管几乎相同的任务设置,我们在多个实验中发现了支持双峰优势的证据。此外,我们的结果表明,这种优势主要来自编码时的感知过程,而不是来自WM中以视听方式存储的感知过程。最后,作为一个主要基于感知的过程,双峰优势似乎对线索特征的特征(即其呈现模态)很敏感。总之,我们的研究结果揭示了双峰优势的机制,现在在线索回忆任务中得到了强有力的检测,进一步加深了我们对感知和WM之间关系的理解。研究结果与之前没有发现双峰优势的研究、潜在的效应机制以及WM多成分模型的更广泛框架有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cognition
Journal of Cognition Psychology-Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书