Seroprevalence of porcine coronavirus antibodies in Iberian pigs and wild boars from central-western Spain.

IF 3.2 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Paloma Encinas, Gustavo Del Real, Ronaldo Magtoto, Juan Carlos Mora-Díaz, Lu Yen, María Templado, Irene Iglesias, José A Carrillo-Ávila, Jesús Hernández, Luis G Giménez-Lirola
{"title":"Seroprevalence of porcine coronavirus antibodies in Iberian pigs and wild boars from central-western Spain.","authors":"Paloma Encinas, Gustavo Del Real, Ronaldo Magtoto, Juan Carlos Mora-Díaz, Lu Yen, María Templado, Irene Iglesias, José A Carrillo-Ávila, Jesús Hernández, Luis G Giménez-Lirola","doi":"10.1186/s40813-026-00488-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Porcine coronaviruses (PoCoVs) are common etiological viral agents of enteric and respiratory disease in swine, but most epidemiological information derives from intensively managed herds. Data from outdoor systems and wildlife remain scarce, despite the potential role of free-range production and wildlife-livestock interactions in sustaining virus transmission. In southern Spain, the traditional Dehesa agroforestry system supports Iberian pigs that share space and resources with wild boars and other species, creating interfaces where cross-species circulation may occur. To address this gap, we assessed the seroprevalence of five PoCoVs, including porcine hemagglutinating encephalomyelitis virus (PHEV), porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV), porcine deltacoronavirus (PDCoV), transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV), and porcine respiratory coronavirus (PRCV), in Iberian pigs and wild boars from central-western Spain. A total of 260 Iberian pig sera and 564 wild boar sera collected between 2016 and 2020 were tested using indirect ELISAs for PHEV, PEDV, and PDCoV and a blocking ELISA for PRCV/TGEV. Antibodies to PHEV were highly prevalent in Iberian pigs (68.0%) and detected at lower levels in wild boars (22.6%), a pattern consistent with endemic exposure in domestic pigs and sporadic circulation in wildlife. PEDV antibodies were identified in 8.5% of Iberian pigs and 2.8% of wild boars, with higher prevalence in pigs during 2016 followed by a sharp decline, suggesting past but not ongoing activity. PDCoV antibodies were rare overall (3.1% in pigs, 2.6% in wild boars) but reached 41.6% in pigs from Cáceres in 2017-2018, indicative of a localized event. PRCV antibodies were widespread in Iberian pigs (67.3%), with higher prevalence in Badajoz compared to Cáceres, while wild boars showed rising seropositivity in Ciudad Real/Toledo by 2022 (up to 33.3%). No TGEV antibodies were detected in either host population, supporting the predominance of PRCV in the region. These findings demonstrate that PHEV and PRCV are enzootic in free-range Iberian pigs, while PEDV and PDCoV circulate at low levels, and wild boars are more likely incidental than reservoir hosts. The detection of antibodies in the absence of clinical outbreaks underscores the silent nature of PoCoV circulation in extensive systems and highlights the importance of integrating wildlife-livestock interfaces into surveillance and biosecurity strategies in Mediterranean production landscapes.</p>","PeriodicalId":20352,"journal":{"name":"Porcine Health Management","volume":" ","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12879451/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Porcine Health Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-026-00488-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Porcine coronaviruses (PoCoVs) are common etiological viral agents of enteric and respiratory disease in swine, but most epidemiological information derives from intensively managed herds. Data from outdoor systems and wildlife remain scarce, despite the potential role of free-range production and wildlife-livestock interactions in sustaining virus transmission. In southern Spain, the traditional Dehesa agroforestry system supports Iberian pigs that share space and resources with wild boars and other species, creating interfaces where cross-species circulation may occur. To address this gap, we assessed the seroprevalence of five PoCoVs, including porcine hemagglutinating encephalomyelitis virus (PHEV), porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV), porcine deltacoronavirus (PDCoV), transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV), and porcine respiratory coronavirus (PRCV), in Iberian pigs and wild boars from central-western Spain. A total of 260 Iberian pig sera and 564 wild boar sera collected between 2016 and 2020 were tested using indirect ELISAs for PHEV, PEDV, and PDCoV and a blocking ELISA for PRCV/TGEV. Antibodies to PHEV were highly prevalent in Iberian pigs (68.0%) and detected at lower levels in wild boars (22.6%), a pattern consistent with endemic exposure in domestic pigs and sporadic circulation in wildlife. PEDV antibodies were identified in 8.5% of Iberian pigs and 2.8% of wild boars, with higher prevalence in pigs during 2016 followed by a sharp decline, suggesting past but not ongoing activity. PDCoV antibodies were rare overall (3.1% in pigs, 2.6% in wild boars) but reached 41.6% in pigs from Cáceres in 2017-2018, indicative of a localized event. PRCV antibodies were widespread in Iberian pigs (67.3%), with higher prevalence in Badajoz compared to Cáceres, while wild boars showed rising seropositivity in Ciudad Real/Toledo by 2022 (up to 33.3%). No TGEV antibodies were detected in either host population, supporting the predominance of PRCV in the region. These findings demonstrate that PHEV and PRCV are enzootic in free-range Iberian pigs, while PEDV and PDCoV circulate at low levels, and wild boars are more likely incidental than reservoir hosts. The detection of antibodies in the absence of clinical outbreaks underscores the silent nature of PoCoV circulation in extensive systems and highlights the importance of integrating wildlife-livestock interfaces into surveillance and biosecurity strategies in Mediterranean production landscapes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

猪冠状病毒抗体在西班牙中西部伊比利亚猪和野猪中的血清流行率。
猪冠状病毒(pocov)是猪肠道和呼吸道疾病的常见病原学病毒,但大多数流行病学信息来自集约化管理的猪群。尽管放养生产和野生动物与牲畜的相互作用在维持病毒传播方面可能发挥作用,但来自室外系统和野生动物的数据仍然很少。在西班牙南部,传统的德赫萨农林业系统支持伊比利亚猪与野猪和其他物种共享空间和资源,创造了可能发生跨物种循环的界面。为了弥补这一空白,我们评估了五种pocov的血清患病率,包括猪血凝性脑脊髓炎病毒(PHEV)、猪流行性腹泻病毒(PEDV)、猪三角洲冠状病毒(PDCoV)、传染性胃肠炎病毒(TGEV)和猪呼吸道冠状病毒(PRCV),这些病毒来自西班牙中西部的伊比利亚猪和野猪。采用间接ELISA检测2016年至2020年期间收集的260份伊比利亚猪血清和564份野猪血清,检测PHEV、PEDV和PDCoV,以及阻断ELISA检测PRCV/TGEV。对PHEV的抗体在伊比利亚猪中高度流行(68.0%),在野猪中检测到的抗体水平较低(22.6%),这种模式与家猪的地方性暴露和野生动物的零星传播相一致。在8.5%的伊比利亚猪和2.8%的野猪中发现了PEDV抗体,2016年猪的流行率较高,随后急剧下降,表明过去但没有持续的活动。PDCoV抗体总体上很少见(猪中为3.1%,野猪中为2.6%),但在2017-2018年期间,猪中PDCoV抗体达到41.6%,表明发生了局部事件。PRCV抗体在伊比利亚猪中广泛存在(67.3%),与Cáceres相比,巴达霍斯的患病率更高,而到2022年,雷亚尔城/托莱多的野猪血清阳性呈上升趋势(高达33.3%)。在两种宿主人群中均未检测到TGEV抗体,支持PRCV在该地区的优势。这些结果表明,PHEV和PRCV在自由放养的伊比利亚猪中是地方性的,而PEDV和PDCoV在低水平传播,野猪比宿主更有可能是偶然的。在没有临床疫情的情况下检测抗体,强调了PoCoV在广泛系统中传播的无声性,并强调了将野生动植物界面纳入地中海生产景观监测和生物安全战略的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Porcine Health Management
Porcine Health Management Veterinary-Food Animals
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
49
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Porcine Health Management (PHM) is an open access peer-reviewed journal that aims to publish relevant, novel and revised information regarding all aspects of swine health medicine and production.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书