Laparoscopic Subtotal Cholecystectomy for Difficult Gallbladders: Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.

Q2 Medicine
Shadi A Alshammary, Sharifah A Othman, Dhuha N Boumarah, Naif Alkhald, Husain N Alshaikh, Nasser Amer, Hassan Alsaleem, Mosab Alarfaj
{"title":"Laparoscopic Subtotal Cholecystectomy for Difficult Gallbladders: Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Shadi A Alshammary, Sharifah A Othman, Dhuha N Boumarah, Naif Alkhald, Husain N Alshaikh, Nasser Amer, Hassan Alsaleem, Mosab Alarfaj","doi":"10.5455/aim.2025.33.328-334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Operating on difficult cholecystectomy with the intent to proceed with total cholecystectomy can be associated with longer postoperative time, excessive bleeding, and increased risk of intraoperative bile duct injury and other complications. Subtotal cholecystectomy is a part of bail-out procedures recommended in cases of difficult cholecystectomy. It is a convenient alternative to total cholecystectomy as it is a comparatively more manageable and safer treatment procedure.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the difference in outcomes between laparoscopic total cholecystectomy (LTC) and laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy (LSC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, cross-sectional study was conducted at King Fahd Hospital of the University (KFHU), Saudi Arabia, between 2010 to 2020. The study included patients over 18 years of age who underwent laparoscopic (subtotal and total) cholecystectomy at KFHU.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 636 cases in the study period, only 21 patients underwent laparoscopic subtotal reconstituting cholecystectomy. The laparoscopic total cholecystectomy group was more diagnosed with biliary colic (56.1%), whereas those who underwent laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy were mainly diagnosed with acute cholecystitis (66.7%). We found a significant association between WBC, reticulocyte count level, and the conversion to LSC. Regarding postoperative outcomes, only 7.8% had a drain in the laparoscopic total cholecystectomy group compared to the majority (71.4%) in the laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy group (p<0.0001). A significantly longer length of stay was reported in the subtotal cholecystectomy group (9.14±7.63 versus 4.6±3.84) and a greater rate of reoperation (9.5% versus 0.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy should be performed in difficult cases when total cholecystectomy is not possible, considering the possible complications of subtotal cholecystectomy. More prospective studies should take into consideration other patient-related factors that might influence postoperative outcomes and overall success rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":7074,"journal":{"name":"Acta Informatica Medica","volume":"33 4","pages":"328-334"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12858265/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Informatica Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2025.33.328-334","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Operating on difficult cholecystectomy with the intent to proceed with total cholecystectomy can be associated with longer postoperative time, excessive bleeding, and increased risk of intraoperative bile duct injury and other complications. Subtotal cholecystectomy is a part of bail-out procedures recommended in cases of difficult cholecystectomy. It is a convenient alternative to total cholecystectomy as it is a comparatively more manageable and safer treatment procedure.

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the difference in outcomes between laparoscopic total cholecystectomy (LTC) and laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy (LSC).

Methods: This retrospective, cross-sectional study was conducted at King Fahd Hospital of the University (KFHU), Saudi Arabia, between 2010 to 2020. The study included patients over 18 years of age who underwent laparoscopic (subtotal and total) cholecystectomy at KFHU.

Results: Out of 636 cases in the study period, only 21 patients underwent laparoscopic subtotal reconstituting cholecystectomy. The laparoscopic total cholecystectomy group was more diagnosed with biliary colic (56.1%), whereas those who underwent laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy were mainly diagnosed with acute cholecystitis (66.7%). We found a significant association between WBC, reticulocyte count level, and the conversion to LSC. Regarding postoperative outcomes, only 7.8% had a drain in the laparoscopic total cholecystectomy group compared to the majority (71.4%) in the laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy group (p<0.0001). A significantly longer length of stay was reported in the subtotal cholecystectomy group (9.14±7.63 versus 4.6±3.84) and a greater rate of reoperation (9.5% versus 0.7%).

Conclusion: Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy should be performed in difficult cases when total cholecystectomy is not possible, considering the possible complications of subtotal cholecystectomy. More prospective studies should take into consideration other patient-related factors that might influence postoperative outcomes and overall success rates.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

腹腔镜胆囊次全切除术治疗胆囊困难:单中心回顾性队列研究。
背景:对难度较大的胆囊切除术进行手术并进行全胆囊切除术可能会导致术后时间延长、出血过多、术中胆管损伤及其他并发症的风险增加。胆囊次全切除术是在胆囊切除术困难的情况下推荐的救助程序的一部分。它是一种方便的替代全胆囊切除术,因为它是一种相对更容易管理和更安全的治疗程序。目的:本研究的目的是评估腹腔镜胆囊全切除术(LTC)和腹腔镜胆囊次全切除术(LSC)的结果差异。方法:本回顾性横断面研究于2010年至2020年在沙特阿拉伯法赫德国王大学医院(KFHU)进行。该研究包括18岁以上在KFHU接受腹腔镜(部分和全部)胆囊切除术的患者。结果:636例患者中,仅有21例患者行腹腔镜胆囊次全切除术。腹腔镜胆囊全切除术组以胆道绞痛为主(56.1%),而腹腔镜胆囊次全切除术组以急性胆囊炎为主(66.7%)。我们发现白细胞、网织红细胞计数水平与LSC转化之间存在显著关联。在术后结果方面,腹腔镜胆囊全切除术组仅7.8%发生引流,而腹腔镜胆囊次全切除术组占多数(71.4%)。结论:考虑到胆囊次全切除术可能出现的并发症,在不能全胆囊切除的困难病例中,应行腹腔镜胆囊次全切除术。更多的前瞻性研究应考虑其他可能影响术后结果和总体成功率的患者相关因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Informatica Medica
Acta Informatica Medica Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书