Undulatory vs. gliding locomotion: Effects on underwater object detection

IF 5.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MARINE
Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-29 DOI:10.1016/j.joes.2025.11.012
Shixian Gong , Dixia Fan , Linlin Kang , Weicheng Cui
{"title":"Undulatory vs. gliding locomotion: Effects on underwater object detection","authors":"Shixian Gong ,&nbsp;Dixia Fan ,&nbsp;Linlin Kang ,&nbsp;Weicheng Cui","doi":"10.1016/j.joes.2025.11.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Underwater object detection based on flow sensing is crucial for bio-inspired robotics, due to its reliable performance in turbid environment. Nevertheless, how locomotion patterns affect sensing performance remains poorly understood. We employ numerical simulations to systematically compare flow sensing performance between two fundamental patterns, which are undulatory and gliding motions, through pressure signal analysis on a foil interacting with a stationary cylinder. The effects of different tail-beat frequencies and lateral distances are also considered. Key findings demonstrate that undulatory locomotion remarkably amplifies effective pressure signals, particularly at higher tail-beat frequencies, whereas gliding provides superior suppression of self-generated flow noise. Both locomotion patterns exhibit exponential signal attenuation with increasing lateral distance, though undulatory motion significantly extends the detection range. These findings propose a hybrid strategy: undulatory motion for long-range detection and gliding motion for high-precision perception. Flow analyses identify a characteristic counter-clockwise vortex structure induced by the cylinder, which directly correlates with the effective pressure signal. Spatiotemporal analysis of cylinder-induced flow perturbations demonstrates that undulatory motion substantially enhances the positive vorticity perturbations on the foil posterior, generating a more pronounced and spatially extended region of negative pressure perturbation. The study advances understanding of locomotion-modulated sensing and provides reliable guidance for bio-inspired robotic design on adaptive underwater navigation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48514,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science","volume":"11 1","pages":"Pages 297-307"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468013325000981","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MARINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Underwater object detection based on flow sensing is crucial for bio-inspired robotics, due to its reliable performance in turbid environment. Nevertheless, how locomotion patterns affect sensing performance remains poorly understood. We employ numerical simulations to systematically compare flow sensing performance between two fundamental patterns, which are undulatory and gliding motions, through pressure signal analysis on a foil interacting with a stationary cylinder. The effects of different tail-beat frequencies and lateral distances are also considered. Key findings demonstrate that undulatory locomotion remarkably amplifies effective pressure signals, particularly at higher tail-beat frequencies, whereas gliding provides superior suppression of self-generated flow noise. Both locomotion patterns exhibit exponential signal attenuation with increasing lateral distance, though undulatory motion significantly extends the detection range. These findings propose a hybrid strategy: undulatory motion for long-range detection and gliding motion for high-precision perception. Flow analyses identify a characteristic counter-clockwise vortex structure induced by the cylinder, which directly correlates with the effective pressure signal. Spatiotemporal analysis of cylinder-induced flow perturbations demonstrates that undulatory motion substantially enhances the positive vorticity perturbations on the foil posterior, generating a more pronounced and spatially extended region of negative pressure perturbation. The study advances understanding of locomotion-modulated sensing and provides reliable guidance for bio-inspired robotic design on adaptive underwater navigation.
波动与滑动运动:对水下目标探测的影响
基于流量传感的水下目标检测对于仿生机器人至关重要,因为它在浑浊环境中具有可靠的性能。然而,运动模式如何影响感知性能仍然知之甚少。本文采用数值模拟的方法,通过对箔片与静止圆柱体相互作用的压力信号分析,系统地比较了波动运动和滑动运动两种基本运动模式的流量传感性能。还考虑了不同尾拍频率和横向距离的影响。主要研究结果表明,波动运动显著放大了有效压力信号,特别是在较高的尾拍频率下,而滑翔则能更好地抑制自生的流动噪声。随着横向距离的增加,两种运动模式都表现出指数级的信号衰减,尽管波动运动显著地扩展了检测范围。这些发现提出了一种混合策略:用于远距离探测的波动运动和用于高精度感知的滑动运动。通过流动分析,发现了一个典型的由气缸引起的逆时针旋涡结构,它与有效压力信号直接相关。对圆柱体诱导的流动扰动的时空分析表明,波动运动大大增强了后叶上的正涡度扰动,产生了一个更明显的空间扩展的负压扰动区域。该研究促进了对运动调制传感的理解,为仿生机器人自适应水下导航设计提供了可靠的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
19.70%
发文量
224
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science (JOES) serves as a platform for disseminating original research and advancements in the realm of ocean engineering and science. JOES encourages the submission of papers covering various aspects of ocean engineering and science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书