Predicting nonresponse to sexual identity question in youth risk behavior surveillance: A machine learning analysis of complex survey data

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Annals of Epidemiology Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-30 DOI:10.1016/j.annepidem.2026.01.011
Yu He MPH , Chanapong Rojanaworarit PhD
{"title":"Predicting nonresponse to sexual identity question in youth risk behavior surveillance: A machine learning analysis of complex survey data","authors":"Yu He MPH ,&nbsp;Chanapong Rojanaworarit PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.annepidem.2026.01.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To compare seven machine learning (ML) models developed to predict non-response to the sexual identity question in the 2023 Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS) and identify the best-performing ML model, along with key attributes associated with the non-response.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data of 20,103 students, with 32 predictors across domains of personal characteristics, school behavior, substance use, and sexual activity were analyzed. Supervised ML models–including random forest (RF), gradient boosting, extreme gradient boosting, decision tree, neural network, lasso, and elastic net were developed and incorporated survey weights. Performance was assessed using F1 score, area under the ROC curve (AUC), and area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>About 10 % of students didn’t respond to the sexual identity question, with higher rates among racial/ethnic minorities, including American Indian/Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander youths. RF model showed the most robust overall performance across all metrics. Attributes predicting non-response included response status to questions of school absence due to safety concerns and having ≥ 4 sexual partners.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Non-response was non-random and concentrated among vulnerable groups. Predictive performance was strong, but findings suggest that response patterns to other sensitive survey items play substantial role, with implications for survey design and non-response adjustment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50767,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Epidemiology","volume":"115 ","pages":"Pages 37-44"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1047279726000347","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To compare seven machine learning (ML) models developed to predict non-response to the sexual identity question in the 2023 Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS) and identify the best-performing ML model, along with key attributes associated with the non-response.

Methods

Data of 20,103 students, with 32 predictors across domains of personal characteristics, school behavior, substance use, and sexual activity were analyzed. Supervised ML models–including random forest (RF), gradient boosting, extreme gradient boosting, decision tree, neural network, lasso, and elastic net were developed and incorporated survey weights. Performance was assessed using F1 score, area under the ROC curve (AUC), and area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC).

Results

About 10 % of students didn’t respond to the sexual identity question, with higher rates among racial/ethnic minorities, including American Indian/Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander youths. RF model showed the most robust overall performance across all metrics. Attributes predicting non-response included response status to questions of school absence due to safety concerns and having ≥ 4 sexual partners.

Conclusions

Non-response was non-random and concentrated among vulnerable groups. Predictive performance was strong, but findings suggest that response patterns to other sensitive survey items play substantial role, with implications for survey design and non-response adjustment.
预测青少年危险行为监测中对性别认同问题的无反应:复杂调查数据的机器学习分析。
目的:比较2023年青少年风险行为监测系统(YRBSS)中用于预测对性别认同问题无反应的七种机器学习(ML)模型,并确定表现最佳的ML模型,以及与无反应相关的关键属性。方法:对20,103名学生的数据进行分析,包括个人特征、学校行为、物质使用和性活动等32个预测因素。开发了有监督的机器学习模型,包括随机森林(RF)、梯度增强、极端梯度增强、决策树、神经网络、lasso和弹性网,并纳入了调查权重。使用F1评分、ROC曲线下面积(AUC)和precision-recall曲线下面积(AUPRC)来评估绩效。结果:约有10%的学生没有回答性别认同问题,其中少数族裔的比例更高,包括美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民和夏威夷原住民/太平洋岛民青年。RF模型在所有指标中显示出最稳健的总体性能。预测无反应的属性包括因安全考虑而缺课和拥有≥4个性伴侣的问题的反应状态。结论:无反应是非随机的,集中在弱势群体中。预测性能很强,但研究结果表明,对其他敏感调查项目的反应模式也起着实质性的作用,对调查设计和非反应调整有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Epidemiology
Annals of Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
1.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The journal emphasizes the application of epidemiologic methods to issues that affect the distribution and determinants of human illness in diverse contexts. Its primary focus is on chronic and acute conditions of diverse etiologies and of major importance to clinical medicine, public health, and health care delivery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书