Association of Daily Glucocorticoid Dose With Worse Patient-Reported Outcomes in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Data From the Almenara Lupus Cohort.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Anubhav Singh, Rocío V Gamboa-Cárdenas, Victor R Pimentel-Quiroz, Zoila Rodriguez-Bellido, Cesar Pastor-Asurza, Risto Perich-Campos, Graciela S Alarcón, Manuel F Ugarte-Gil
{"title":"Association of Daily Glucocorticoid Dose With Worse Patient-Reported Outcomes in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Data From the Almenara Lupus Cohort.","authors":"Anubhav Singh, Rocío V Gamboa-Cárdenas, Victor R Pimentel-Quiroz, Zoila Rodriguez-Bellido, Cesar Pastor-Asurza, Risto Perich-Campos, Graciela S Alarcón, Manuel F Ugarte-Gil","doi":"10.3899/jrheum.2025-0394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the association between the daily glucocorticoid (GC) dose and various patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) who have achieved Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients from a single-center cohort were included. PROs included the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F), Lupus Quality of Life (LupusQoL), physical and mental component summary scores of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and the Lupus Foundation of America Rapid Evaluation of Activity in Lupus (LFA-REAL) PRO. Univariable and multivariable generalized estimating equations (GEEs) were performed; the multivariable models were adjusted for possible confounders: age at diagnosis, sex, socioeconomic status, educational level, ethnicity, disease duration, disease activity and damage, and antimalarial and immunosuppressant use. In an alternative analysis, GEE was also performed with patients categorized on the basis of 4 prednisone dose categories: 0, > 0 and ≤ 2.5, > 2.5 and ≤ 5 mg, and > 5 and ≤ 7.5 mg.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred twenty-four patients and 1338 LLDAS visits were included. In the adjusted analysis, the daily GC dose was associated with worse scores in FACIT-F, LFA-REAL PRO, and 4 out of the 8 domains of the LupusQoL. In the alternative analysis, after adjustment, the patients in the high GC dose category had a trend of worse PRO scores in the adjusted analysis, whereas those in the lower GC dose category showed a trend of better PRO scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The daily GC dose is associated with worse PROs in patients with SLE in LLDAS, even after adjusting for possible confounders.</p>","PeriodicalId":50064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"986-991"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.2025-0394","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the association between the daily glucocorticoid (GC) dose and various patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) who have achieved Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS).

Methods: Patients from a single-center cohort were included. PROs included the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F), Lupus Quality of Life (LupusQoL), physical and mental component summary scores of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and the Lupus Foundation of America Rapid Evaluation of Activity in Lupus (LFA-REAL) PRO. Univariable and multivariable generalized estimating equations (GEEs) were performed; the multivariable models were adjusted for possible confounders: age at diagnosis, sex, socioeconomic status, educational level, ethnicity, disease duration, disease activity and damage, and antimalarial and immunosuppressant use. In an alternative analysis, GEE was also performed with patients categorized on the basis of 4 prednisone dose categories: 0, > 0 and ≤ 2.5, > 2.5 and ≤ 5 mg, and > 5 and ≤ 7.5 mg.

Results: Three hundred twenty-four patients and 1338 LLDAS visits were included. In the adjusted analysis, the daily GC dose was associated with worse scores in FACIT-F, LFA-REAL PRO, and 4 out of the 8 domains of the LupusQoL. In the alternative analysis, after adjustment, the patients in the high GC dose category had a trend of worse PRO scores in the adjusted analysis, whereas those in the lower GC dose category showed a trend of better PRO scores.

Conclusion: The daily GC dose is associated with worse PROs in patients with SLE in LLDAS, even after adjusting for possible confounders.

在Almenara狼疮队列患者中,每日糖皮质激素剂量与较差的患者报告结果相关。
目的:评估达到狼疮低疾病活动状态(LLDAS)的患者每日GC剂量与各种患者报告预后(PROs)之间的关系。方法:纳入来自单中心队列的患者。PRO包括FACIT-F(慢性疾病治疗-疲劳功能评估)、LupusQoL(狼疮生活质量)、SF-36 (36-Item Short Form Health Survey)的身心成分总结测量和LFA-REAL PRO(美国狼疮基金会狼疮活动快速评估)。建立单变量和多变量广义估计方程(GEE);多变量模型对可能的混杂因素进行了调整:诊断年龄、性别、社会经济地位、教育水平、种族、疾病持续时间、疾病活动和损害、抗疟药和免疫抑制剂的使用。在另一项分析中,也对患者进行了GEE,根据4种泼尼松剂量分类:0mg, >0mg &≤2.5mg, >2.5mg &≤5mg和>5mg &≤7.5mg。结果:纳入324例患者和1338次LLDAS访问。在调整后的分析中,每日GC剂量与更差的FACIT-F、LFA-REAL PRO和LupusQoL评分的8个域中的4个相关。在替代分析中,调整后的高GC剂量类别患者PRO评分有较差的趋势,低GC剂量类别患者PRO评分有较好的趋势。结论:即使在调整了可能的混杂因素后,使用LLDAS的SLE患者每日GC剂量与更差的PROs相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Rheumatology
Journal of Rheumatology 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.10%
发文量
285
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rheumatology is a monthly international serial edited by Earl D. Silverman. The Journal features research articles on clinical subjects from scientists working in rheumatology and related fields, as well as proceedings of meetings as supplements to regular issues. Highlights of our 41 years serving Rheumatology include: groundbreaking and provocative editorials such as "Inverting the Pyramid," renowned Pediatric Rheumatology, proceedings of OMERACT and the Canadian Rheumatology Association, Cochrane Musculoskeletal Reviews, and supplements on emerging therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书