Long-term bioaugmentation of a carrier enhanced duckweed-based wastewater treatment system via the addition of activated sludge and denitrifying phosphate-accumulating bacterium

IF 4.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Ecological Engineering Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-02 DOI:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2026.107919
Yonggui Zhao , Ruidong Ma , Xixi Li , Jinquan Li , Tianning Liang , Wei Li , Junjun Chang , Changqun Duan
{"title":"Long-term bioaugmentation of a carrier enhanced duckweed-based wastewater treatment system via the addition of activated sludge and denitrifying phosphate-accumulating bacterium","authors":"Yonggui Zhao ,&nbsp;Ruidong Ma ,&nbsp;Xixi Li ,&nbsp;Jinquan Li ,&nbsp;Tianning Liang ,&nbsp;Wei Li ,&nbsp;Junjun Chang ,&nbsp;Changqun Duan","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2026.107919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Duckweed exhibits distinct advantages over other aquatic plants in phytoremediation. Bioaugmentation is a promising approach for enhancing the treatment performance of various wastewater treatment systems, including duckweed-based systems (DS). However, there is a lack of suitable inoculants for field-scale DS bioaugmentation, and the long-term viability and mechanisms of these inoculants are still poorly understood. To address this, a single strain (<em>Pseudomonas</em> sp. DWP1) and a mixed culture (activated sludge) were separately added into two carrier-enhanced DS to systematically evaluate their application potential for DS bioaugmentation by comparing with another control DS over a year. The results indicated that adding strain DWP1 and activated sludge increased the dissolved oxygen concentration and oxidation-reduction potential of pond water. Meanwhile, they promoted duckweed growth (by 64.95% and 41.39%, respectively), enhanced nutrient recovery (by 68.97% and 44.83% for nitrogen, and 71.43% and 42.86% for phosphorus, respectively) and pollutant removal in the DS, and reduced CH<sub>4</sub> emission (by 68.88% and 33.16%, respectively) from the DS. Compared with activated sludge, strain DWP1 had a more significant impact on microbial diversity, community composition, and the relative abundance of dominant assemblages probably due to its high adaptability and successful survival in the duckweed system, which results in the better bioaugmentation performance of strain DWP1 in terms of duckweed biomass production, water purification, and carbon emission reduction in the DS. Therefore, strain DWP1 has greater application potential than activated sludge for the bioaugmentation of the DS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"226 ","pages":"Article 107919"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857426000297","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Duckweed exhibits distinct advantages over other aquatic plants in phytoremediation. Bioaugmentation is a promising approach for enhancing the treatment performance of various wastewater treatment systems, including duckweed-based systems (DS). However, there is a lack of suitable inoculants for field-scale DS bioaugmentation, and the long-term viability and mechanisms of these inoculants are still poorly understood. To address this, a single strain (Pseudomonas sp. DWP1) and a mixed culture (activated sludge) were separately added into two carrier-enhanced DS to systematically evaluate their application potential for DS bioaugmentation by comparing with another control DS over a year. The results indicated that adding strain DWP1 and activated sludge increased the dissolved oxygen concentration and oxidation-reduction potential of pond water. Meanwhile, they promoted duckweed growth (by 64.95% and 41.39%, respectively), enhanced nutrient recovery (by 68.97% and 44.83% for nitrogen, and 71.43% and 42.86% for phosphorus, respectively) and pollutant removal in the DS, and reduced CH4 emission (by 68.88% and 33.16%, respectively) from the DS. Compared with activated sludge, strain DWP1 had a more significant impact on microbial diversity, community composition, and the relative abundance of dominant assemblages probably due to its high adaptability and successful survival in the duckweed system, which results in the better bioaugmentation performance of strain DWP1 in terms of duckweed biomass production, water purification, and carbon emission reduction in the DS. Therefore, strain DWP1 has greater application potential than activated sludge for the bioaugmentation of the DS.

Abstract Image

通过添加活性污泥和反硝化磷酸盐积累细菌的载体增强浮萍废水处理系统的长期生物强化
浮萍在植物修复方面具有明显的优势。生物强化是一种很有前途的方法,可以提高各种废水处理系统的处理性能,包括浮萍系统(DS)。然而,目前还缺乏适合大田生产的接种剂,而且这些接种剂的长期生存能力和作用机制仍不清楚。为了解决这一问题,将单一菌株(假单胞菌sp. DWP1)和混合培养物(活性污泥)分别添加到两个载体增强的DS中,通过与另一个对照DS进行一年的比较,系统地评估它们在DS生物增强方面的应用潜力。结果表明,添加菌株DWP1和活性污泥可提高池水的溶解氧浓度和氧化还原电位。同时,它们促进了DS中浮萍的生长(分别提高了64.95%和41.39%),促进了营养物的回收(氮分别提高了68.97%和44.83%,磷分别提高了71.43%和42.86%)和污染物的去除,减少了DS中CH4的排放(分别降低了68.88%和33.16%)。与活性污泥相比,菌株DWP1对微生物多样性、群落组成和优势组合的相对丰度的影响更为显著,这可能是由于菌株DWP1在浮萍系统中的适应性高,且在浮萍系统中存活成功,从而导致菌株DWP1在DS中具有更好的浮萍生物量生产、水净化和碳减排等生物增强性能。因此,菌株DWP1在DS生物强化方面比活性污泥具有更大的应用潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书