Hannah S. Savage , Beth F. Longley , Wilson P.H. Lim , Camilla L. Nord , James Kilner , Sarah N. Garfinkel
{"title":"The staircase-heartbeat discrimination task (S-HDT)","authors":"Hannah S. Savage , Beth F. Longley , Wilson P.H. Lim , Camilla L. Nord , James Kilner , Sarah N. Garfinkel","doi":"10.1016/j.biopsycho.2026.109206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cardiac interoceptive accuracy has received significant attention in the growing field of interoception. Despite this, there are clear, and openly discussed limitations to the tasks commonly used to assess this dimension, including questionable construct validity, unjustified assumptions, and that, depending on the task, few participants exceed chance performance. To address this, we propose a novel version of the heartbeat discrimination task. The Staircase-Heartbeat Discrimination Task (S-HDT) addresses the aforementioned limitations and facilitates a more nuanced understanding of individual differences in cardiac interoceptive accuracy. Herein we (i) detail the experimental null, (ii) demonstrate the recoverability of known point of subjective simultaneity and accuracy values by passing simulated data through our analysis pipeline and (iii) highlight the feasibility and tolerability of this task in a young adult sample (n = 42; mean age = 22.57 +/- 4.55; 64.28 % women). In our sample, we show the S-HDT has greater sensitivity and specificity than the original HDT, and enables the prediction of accuracy as well as individuals point of subjective simultaneity. With a running time of ∼30 min, fully automated, open source, and freely available code (via GitHub), this task is accessible to further our understanding of cardiac interoception across multiple interoceptive domains.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55372,"journal":{"name":"Biological Psychology","volume":"204 ","pages":"Article 109206"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301051126000190","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cardiac interoceptive accuracy has received significant attention in the growing field of interoception. Despite this, there are clear, and openly discussed limitations to the tasks commonly used to assess this dimension, including questionable construct validity, unjustified assumptions, and that, depending on the task, few participants exceed chance performance. To address this, we propose a novel version of the heartbeat discrimination task. The Staircase-Heartbeat Discrimination Task (S-HDT) addresses the aforementioned limitations and facilitates a more nuanced understanding of individual differences in cardiac interoceptive accuracy. Herein we (i) detail the experimental null, (ii) demonstrate the recoverability of known point of subjective simultaneity and accuracy values by passing simulated data through our analysis pipeline and (iii) highlight the feasibility and tolerability of this task in a young adult sample (n = 42; mean age = 22.57 +/- 4.55; 64.28 % women). In our sample, we show the S-HDT has greater sensitivity and specificity than the original HDT, and enables the prediction of accuracy as well as individuals point of subjective simultaneity. With a running time of ∼30 min, fully automated, open source, and freely available code (via GitHub), this task is accessible to further our understanding of cardiac interoception across multiple interoceptive domains.
期刊介绍:
Biological Psychology publishes original scientific papers on the biological aspects of psychological states and processes. Biological aspects include electrophysiology and biochemical assessments during psychological experiments as well as biologically induced changes in psychological function. Psychological investigations based on biological theories are also of interest. All aspects of psychological functioning, including psychopathology, are germane.
The Journal concentrates on work with human subjects, but may consider work with animal subjects if conceptually related to issues in human biological psychology.