Soil seed banks mediate soil–vegetation coupling in mining-induced fissure landscapes

IF 4.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Ecological Engineering Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-28 DOI:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2026.107909
Haiyan Liu , Huadong Du , Wenjie Nie , Yangyang He , Yinli Bi
{"title":"Soil seed banks mediate soil–vegetation coupling in mining-induced fissure landscapes","authors":"Haiyan Liu ,&nbsp;Huadong Du ,&nbsp;Wenjie Nie ,&nbsp;Yangyang He ,&nbsp;Yinli Bi","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2026.107909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mining-induced ground fissures in coal-mining subsidence landscapes disrupt soil structure and near-surface hydrology, creating fine-scale habitat heterogeneity that can impede natural vegetation recovery. Soil seed banks represent a critical propagule reservoir, yet their spatial dynamics, governing drivers, and coupling with aboveground vegetation remain insufficiently quantified in fissure-affected systems. Soil seed banks were assessed at four distance classes (0–1 m, 1–2 m, 2–5 m, and a non-subsided control) and two soil layers (0–10 cm and 10–20 cm) using germination assays, together with vegetation surveys and soil physicochemical measurements. Mantel tests and structural equation modeling (SEM) were applied to identify dominant drivers and pathways. Soil seed bank density and diversity declined sharply within 0–2 m of fissures, with the strongest reductions in the surface layer, indicating a spatially bounded disturbance footprint. Soil moisture and soil organic matter exerted positive influences on soil seed bank size and composition, whereas crust thickness imposed consistent negative effects, supporting a barrier-mediated constraint on seed retention and emergence. SEM further showed that soil conditions affected vegetation density and richness largely through indirect pathways mediated by soil seed bank traits, highlighting the soil seed bank as a key intermediary linking soil degradation to vegetation outcomes. Species similarity between the soil seed bank and aboveground vegetation increased with distance from fissures; 68 species were shared overall and 16 taxa formed a core pool shared across all zones. These findings provide a mechanistic basis for distance-based, differentiated restoration in mining subsidence areas, prioritizing microsite amelioration and propagule supplementation near fissures and assisted natural regeneration in less impacted zones.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"225 ","pages":"Article 107909"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857426000194","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mining-induced ground fissures in coal-mining subsidence landscapes disrupt soil structure and near-surface hydrology, creating fine-scale habitat heterogeneity that can impede natural vegetation recovery. Soil seed banks represent a critical propagule reservoir, yet their spatial dynamics, governing drivers, and coupling with aboveground vegetation remain insufficiently quantified in fissure-affected systems. Soil seed banks were assessed at four distance classes (0–1 m, 1–2 m, 2–5 m, and a non-subsided control) and two soil layers (0–10 cm and 10–20 cm) using germination assays, together with vegetation surveys and soil physicochemical measurements. Mantel tests and structural equation modeling (SEM) were applied to identify dominant drivers and pathways. Soil seed bank density and diversity declined sharply within 0–2 m of fissures, with the strongest reductions in the surface layer, indicating a spatially bounded disturbance footprint. Soil moisture and soil organic matter exerted positive influences on soil seed bank size and composition, whereas crust thickness imposed consistent negative effects, supporting a barrier-mediated constraint on seed retention and emergence. SEM further showed that soil conditions affected vegetation density and richness largely through indirect pathways mediated by soil seed bank traits, highlighting the soil seed bank as a key intermediary linking soil degradation to vegetation outcomes. Species similarity between the soil seed bank and aboveground vegetation increased with distance from fissures; 68 species were shared overall and 16 taxa formed a core pool shared across all zones. These findings provide a mechanistic basis for distance-based, differentiated restoration in mining subsidence areas, prioritizing microsite amelioration and propagule supplementation near fissures and assisted natural regeneration in less impacted zones.
土壤种子库在采动裂隙景观中调节土壤-植被耦合
在煤矿沉陷景观中,采矿诱发的地裂缝破坏了土壤结构和近地表水文,造成了精细尺度的栖息地异质性,阻碍了自然植被的恢复。土壤种子库是一个重要的繁殖体库,但在裂缝影响系统中,它们的空间动态、控制驱动因素以及与地上植被的耦合仍未得到充分的量化。利用萌发试验、植被调查和土壤理化测量,对土壤种子库进行了4个距离等级(0-1 m、1-2 m、2-5 m和非沉降对照)和2个土层(0-10 cm和10-20 cm)的评估。应用Mantel试验和结构方程模型(SEM)来确定主要驱动因素和途径。土壤种子库密度和多样性在裂隙0 ~ 2 m范围内急剧下降,其中表层下降幅度最大,表明扰动足迹在空间上是有界的。土壤水分和土壤有机质对土壤种子库的大小和组成有正向影响,而结壳厚度对种子库的大小和组成有负向影响,支持屏障介导的种子保留和出苗限制。SEM进一步表明,土壤条件主要通过土壤种子库特征介导的间接途径影响植被密度和丰富度,强调土壤种子库是连接土壤退化和植被结果的关键中介。土壤种子库与地上植被的物种相似性随距离裂缝的远近而增加;共有68种,16个类群形成了一个核心池,在所有区域共享。这些发现为采矿沉陷区基于距离的差异化恢复、裂缝附近的微站点改善和繁殖体补充优先以及在受影响较小的区域辅助自然再生提供了机制基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书