Interregional trade estimation as a case for economic integration

IF 2.1 Q2 GEOGRAPHY
Regional Science Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-15 DOI:10.1016/j.rspp.2025.100269
Giacomo Arena , Daniele Bregoli , Ricardo Ferreira , Marco Ciro Liscio , Paolo Sospiro
{"title":"Interregional trade estimation as a case for economic integration","authors":"Giacomo Arena ,&nbsp;Daniele Bregoli ,&nbsp;Ricardo Ferreira ,&nbsp;Marco Ciro Liscio ,&nbsp;Paolo Sospiro","doi":"10.1016/j.rspp.2025.100269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper explores the estimation of interregional trade as a lens through which to assess the broader dynamics of economic integration, with a particular emphasis on the persistent \"border effect\" in the European Union (EU). Although regional integration is intended to foster seamless economic flows through policy convergence and infrastructural alignment, empirical evidence reveals significant barriers to cross-border trade. These frictions (both tangible and intangible) challenge the assumption of a borderless economy within integrated regions. Through a systematic literature review guided by the PRISMA methodology, the study examines the evolution of trade estimation techniques, focusing on the gravity model as the dominant analytical framework. The review highlights key methodological innovations, including hybrid gravity-input-output models, RAS calibration, and spatial econometrics, as well as sectoral and regional applications that expose asymmetries in trade flows. By synthesizing findings from peer-reviewed sources and academic research, the paper reveals the multidimensional nature of border effects and the uneven outcomes of integration policies. The analysis is complemented by references to grey literature, mainly policy documents, allowing to set the societal relevance of the research. It concludes that while gravity models remain central to trade analysis, their future relevance depends on incorporating behavioural, infrastructural, governance and political dimensions. This work contributes to ongoing academic and policy debates by advocating for a more nuanced, interdisciplinary approach to understanding economic integration in an increasingly fragmented yet interconnected world.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45520,"journal":{"name":"Regional Science Policy and Practice","volume":"18 2","pages":"Article 100269"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Science Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S175778022500099X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explores the estimation of interregional trade as a lens through which to assess the broader dynamics of economic integration, with a particular emphasis on the persistent "border effect" in the European Union (EU). Although regional integration is intended to foster seamless economic flows through policy convergence and infrastructural alignment, empirical evidence reveals significant barriers to cross-border trade. These frictions (both tangible and intangible) challenge the assumption of a borderless economy within integrated regions. Through a systematic literature review guided by the PRISMA methodology, the study examines the evolution of trade estimation techniques, focusing on the gravity model as the dominant analytical framework. The review highlights key methodological innovations, including hybrid gravity-input-output models, RAS calibration, and spatial econometrics, as well as sectoral and regional applications that expose asymmetries in trade flows. By synthesizing findings from peer-reviewed sources and academic research, the paper reveals the multidimensional nature of border effects and the uneven outcomes of integration policies. The analysis is complemented by references to grey literature, mainly policy documents, allowing to set the societal relevance of the research. It concludes that while gravity models remain central to trade analysis, their future relevance depends on incorporating behavioural, infrastructural, governance and political dimensions. This work contributes to ongoing academic and policy debates by advocating for a more nuanced, interdisciplinary approach to understanding economic integration in an increasingly fragmented yet interconnected world.
作为经济一体化案例的区域间贸易估算
本文探讨了区域间贸易的估计,以此作为评估更广泛的经济一体化动态的一个镜头,特别强调了欧盟(EU)持续存在的“边界效应”。尽管区域一体化旨在通过政策趋同和基础设施协调促进无缝的经济流动,但经验证据表明,跨境贸易存在重大障碍。这些摩擦(有形的和无形的)挑战了一体化区域内无国界经济的假设。在PRISMA方法论的指导下,通过系统的文献综述,本研究考察了贸易估计技术的演变,重点关注重力模型作为主要的分析框架。该综述强调了关键的方法创新,包括混合重力-投入-产出模型、RAS校准和空间计量经济学,以及揭示贸易流动不对称性的部门和区域应用。通过综合来自同行评议资料和学术研究的发现,本文揭示了边界效应的多维性和一体化政策的不均衡结果。该分析还参考了灰色文献,主要是政策文件,从而确定了研究的社会相关性。报告的结论是,尽管引力模型仍是贸易分析的核心,但其未来的相关性取决于纳入行为、基础设施、治理和政治维度。这项工作通过倡导一种更细致、跨学科的方法来理解日益分散但相互联系的世界中的经济一体化,为正在进行的学术和政策辩论做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
92
期刊介绍: Regional Science Policy & Practice (RSPP) is the official policy and practitioner orientated journal of the Regional Science Association International. It is an international journal that publishes high quality papers in applied regional science that explore policy and practice issues in regional and local development. It welcomes papers from a range of academic disciplines and practitioners including planning, public policy, geography, economics and environmental science and related fields. Papers should address the interface between academic debates and policy development and application. RSPP provides an opportunity for academics and policy makers to develop a dialogue to identify and explore many of the challenges facing local and regional economies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书