Giacomo Arena , Daniele Bregoli , Ricardo Ferreira , Marco Ciro Liscio , Paolo Sospiro
{"title":"Interregional trade estimation as a case for economic integration","authors":"Giacomo Arena , Daniele Bregoli , Ricardo Ferreira , Marco Ciro Liscio , Paolo Sospiro","doi":"10.1016/j.rspp.2025.100269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper explores the estimation of interregional trade as a lens through which to assess the broader dynamics of economic integration, with a particular emphasis on the persistent \"border effect\" in the European Union (EU). Although regional integration is intended to foster seamless economic flows through policy convergence and infrastructural alignment, empirical evidence reveals significant barriers to cross-border trade. These frictions (both tangible and intangible) challenge the assumption of a borderless economy within integrated regions. Through a systematic literature review guided by the PRISMA methodology, the study examines the evolution of trade estimation techniques, focusing on the gravity model as the dominant analytical framework. The review highlights key methodological innovations, including hybrid gravity-input-output models, RAS calibration, and spatial econometrics, as well as sectoral and regional applications that expose asymmetries in trade flows. By synthesizing findings from peer-reviewed sources and academic research, the paper reveals the multidimensional nature of border effects and the uneven outcomes of integration policies. The analysis is complemented by references to grey literature, mainly policy documents, allowing to set the societal relevance of the research. It concludes that while gravity models remain central to trade analysis, their future relevance depends on incorporating behavioural, infrastructural, governance and political dimensions. This work contributes to ongoing academic and policy debates by advocating for a more nuanced, interdisciplinary approach to understanding economic integration in an increasingly fragmented yet interconnected world.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45520,"journal":{"name":"Regional Science Policy and Practice","volume":"18 2","pages":"Article 100269"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Science Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S175778022500099X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper explores the estimation of interregional trade as a lens through which to assess the broader dynamics of economic integration, with a particular emphasis on the persistent "border effect" in the European Union (EU). Although regional integration is intended to foster seamless economic flows through policy convergence and infrastructural alignment, empirical evidence reveals significant barriers to cross-border trade. These frictions (both tangible and intangible) challenge the assumption of a borderless economy within integrated regions. Through a systematic literature review guided by the PRISMA methodology, the study examines the evolution of trade estimation techniques, focusing on the gravity model as the dominant analytical framework. The review highlights key methodological innovations, including hybrid gravity-input-output models, RAS calibration, and spatial econometrics, as well as sectoral and regional applications that expose asymmetries in trade flows. By synthesizing findings from peer-reviewed sources and academic research, the paper reveals the multidimensional nature of border effects and the uneven outcomes of integration policies. The analysis is complemented by references to grey literature, mainly policy documents, allowing to set the societal relevance of the research. It concludes that while gravity models remain central to trade analysis, their future relevance depends on incorporating behavioural, infrastructural, governance and political dimensions. This work contributes to ongoing academic and policy debates by advocating for a more nuanced, interdisciplinary approach to understanding economic integration in an increasingly fragmented yet interconnected world.
期刊介绍:
Regional Science Policy & Practice (RSPP) is the official policy and practitioner orientated journal of the Regional Science Association International. It is an international journal that publishes high quality papers in applied regional science that explore policy and practice issues in regional and local development. It welcomes papers from a range of academic disciplines and practitioners including planning, public policy, geography, economics and environmental science and related fields. Papers should address the interface between academic debates and policy development and application. RSPP provides an opportunity for academics and policy makers to develop a dialogue to identify and explore many of the challenges facing local and regional economies.