Network co-activation relates to executive function following pediatric traumatic brain injury.

IF 3 4区 心理学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Katherine A Billetdeaux, Florencia Ontiveros, Haileigh F Galloway, Kathryn Vannatta, Warren Lo, William A Cunningham, Elisabeth Wilde, Keith Owen Yeates, Kristen R Hoskinson
{"title":"Network co-activation relates to executive function following pediatric traumatic brain injury.","authors":"Katherine A Billetdeaux, Florencia Ontiveros, Haileigh F Galloway, Kathryn Vannatta, Warren Lo, William A Cunningham, Elisabeth Wilde, Keith Owen Yeates, Kristen R Hoskinson","doi":"10.1017/S1355617725101781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated functional connectivity in the default mode, central executive, dorsal attention, and salience networks (SN) and its relation to executive function in youth with traumatic brain injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-three youth with traumatic brain injury (11 with moderate-to-severe injury (6 male, <i>m</i><sub>age</sub> = 11.78 ± 2.68 years, <i>m</i><sub>timesinceinjury</sub> = 3.71 ± 2.43 years) and 12 with complicated-mild injury (9 male, <i>m</i><sub>age</sub> = 12.59 ± 1.99 years, <i>m</i><sub>timesinceinjury</sub> = 4.55 ± 1.59 years) and 17 youth with orthopedic injury (11 male, <i>m</i><sub>age</sub> = 11.75 ± 2.12 years, <i>m</i><sub>timesinceinjury</sub> = 3.95 ± 1.79 years)) completed resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging and a parent rated their child's executive function.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found group differences in the strength of connectivity among four regions in the default mode network (DMN) and two regions of the SN, <i>p</i>s < .05, Eta<sup>2</sup> = .151-.229. The orthopedic injury group demonstrated significant negative between-network connectivity, while brain injury groups had negligible negative or, in some cases, positive between-network associations. Groups did not differ on parent ratings of executive function, as all groups fell above the normative mean, reflecting poorer than expected everyday executive behavior. Attenuation of typical negative between-network association between the posterior cingulate in the DMN and two regions of the salience network was associated with worse parent-rated executive behavior (<i>r</i>s = .291-.317, <i>p</i>s < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings illustrate the implications of disrupted downregulation of the default mode network by the SN following pediatric brain injury. They also demonstrate how disruption in functional connectivity may underlie poor executive function after childhood traumatic brain injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":49995,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society","volume":" ","pages":"123-131"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12959488/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617725101781","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study investigated functional connectivity in the default mode, central executive, dorsal attention, and salience networks (SN) and its relation to executive function in youth with traumatic brain injury.

Methods: Twenty-three youth with traumatic brain injury (11 with moderate-to-severe injury (6 male, mage = 11.78 ± 2.68 years, mtimesinceinjury = 3.71 ± 2.43 years) and 12 with complicated-mild injury (9 male, mage = 12.59 ± 1.99 years, mtimesinceinjury = 4.55 ± 1.59 years) and 17 youth with orthopedic injury (11 male, mage = 11.75 ± 2.12 years, mtimesinceinjury = 3.95 ± 1.79 years)) completed resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging and a parent rated their child's executive function.

Results: We found group differences in the strength of connectivity among four regions in the default mode network (DMN) and two regions of the SN, ps < .05, Eta2 = .151-.229. The orthopedic injury group demonstrated significant negative between-network connectivity, while brain injury groups had negligible negative or, in some cases, positive between-network associations. Groups did not differ on parent ratings of executive function, as all groups fell above the normative mean, reflecting poorer than expected everyday executive behavior. Attenuation of typical negative between-network association between the posterior cingulate in the DMN and two regions of the salience network was associated with worse parent-rated executive behavior (rs = .291-.317, ps < .05).

Conclusions: Findings illustrate the implications of disrupted downregulation of the default mode network by the SN following pediatric brain injury. They also demonstrate how disruption in functional connectivity may underlie poor executive function after childhood traumatic brain injury.

网络协同激活与儿童创伤性脑损伤后的执行功能有关。
目的:研究外伤性脑损伤青少年默认模式、中央执行网络、背侧注意网络和显著性网络(SN)的功能连通性及其与执行功能的关系。方法:二十三岁青年与创伤性脑损伤(11严重损伤(6男,法师= 11.78±2.68年,mtimesinceinjury = 3.71±2.43年)和12 complicated-mild损伤(9男,法师= 12.59±1.99年,mtimesinceinjury = 4.55±1.59年)和17岁青年骨科损伤(11男,法师= 11.75±2.12年,mtimesinceinjury = 3.95±1.79年))完成静息状态功能磁共振成像和父母认为孩子的执行功能。结果:我们发现默认模式网络(DMN)的四个区域和SN的两个区域的连通性强度存在组间差异,ps < 0.05, Eta2 = 0.151 - 0.229。骨科损伤组表现出显著的网络间负连接,而脑损伤组的网络间负连接可以忽略不计,在某些情况下,网络间正连接可以忽略不计。各组在父母对执行功能的评分上没有差异,因为所有组都低于标准平均值,反映出比预期更差的日常执行行为。DMN后扣带与显著性网络两个区域之间典型负网络间关联的减弱与父母评分较差的执行行为相关(rs = 0.291 - 0.317, ps < 0.05)。结论:研究结果说明了儿童脑损伤后SN破坏默认模式网络下调的含义。他们还证明了功能连接的中断可能是儿童创伤性脑损伤后执行功能低下的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
185
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society is the official journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, an organization of over 4,500 international members from a variety of disciplines. The Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society welcomes original, creative, high quality research papers covering all areas of neuropsychology. The focus of articles may be primarily experimental, applied, or clinical. Contributions will broadly reflect the interest of all areas of neuropsychology, including but not limited to: development of cognitive processes, brain-behavior relationships, adult and pediatric neuropsychology, neurobehavioral syndromes (such as aphasia or apraxia), and the interfaces of neuropsychology with related areas such as behavioral neurology, neuropsychiatry, genetics, and cognitive neuroscience. Papers that utilize behavioral, neuroimaging, and electrophysiological measures are appropriate. To assure maximum flexibility and to promote diverse mechanisms of scholarly communication, the following formats are available in addition to a Regular Research Article: Brief Communication is a shorter research article; Rapid Communication is intended for "fast breaking" new work that does not yet justify a full length article and is placed on a fast review track; Case Report is a theoretically important and unique case study; Critical Review and Short Review are thoughtful considerations of topics of importance to neuropsychology and include meta-analyses; Dialogue provides a forum for publishing two distinct positions on controversial issues in a point-counterpoint format; Special Issue and Special Section consist of several articles linked thematically; Letter to the Editor responds to recent articles published in the Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society; and Book Review, which is considered but is no longer solicited.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书