Endoscopic tympanoplasty using small intestinal submucosa xenografts for large tympanic membrane perforations: a one-year retrospective cohort study with clinical follow-up.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Po-Wen Chuang, Il Joon Moon, Li-Chun Hsieh, Chin-Kuo Chen
{"title":"Endoscopic tympanoplasty using small intestinal submucosa xenografts for large tympanic membrane perforations: a one-year retrospective cohort study with clinical follow-up.","authors":"Po-Wen Chuang, Il Joon Moon, Li-Chun Hsieh, Chin-Kuo Chen","doi":"10.1186/s13005-026-00589-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND: To evaluate the anatomical and audiological outcomes of endoscopic tympanoplasty using porcine small intestinal submucosal (SIS) xenografts for repairing large tympanic membrane (TM) perforations. METHODS: This retrospective study included 102 patients with tympanic membrane perforations involving more than 50% of the pars tensa who underwent transcanal endoscopic tympanoplasty. Among them, 52 received small intestinal submucosa (SIS) grafts and 50 received perichondrial grafts. All patients were followed for at least 12 months. Anatomical outcomes were evaluated using otoscopic examination, and audiological outcomes were assessed using pure-tone audiometry. Multiple linear regression was performed to determine the association between clinical variables (age, sex, and comorbidities) and postoperative air–bone gap (ABG) gain. RESULTS: The graft uptake rates were 88.5% for SIS and 86% for perichondrium. Significant postoperative improvements in ABG were observed across all tested frequencies, with no significant differences between the two graft types. In the SIS group, patients younger than 65 years demonstrated significantly greater ABG gain compared with those aged 65 years or older (11.8 ± 8.3 dB vs. 5.8 ± 10.0 dB; p = 0.005). Sex and comorbidities were not associated with audiological outcomes. No major postoperative complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic tympanoplasty with SIS xenografts is a reliable and effective option for the repair of large tympanic membrane perforations, demonstrating high graft uptake rates and satisfactory postoperative hearing improvement. </p>","PeriodicalId":12994,"journal":{"name":"Head & Face Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12924546/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Head & Face Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-026-00589-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the anatomical and audiological outcomes of endoscopic tympanoplasty using porcine small intestinal submucosal (SIS) xenografts for repairing large tympanic membrane (TM) perforations. METHODS: This retrospective study included 102 patients with tympanic membrane perforations involving more than 50% of the pars tensa who underwent transcanal endoscopic tympanoplasty. Among them, 52 received small intestinal submucosa (SIS) grafts and 50 received perichondrial grafts. All patients were followed for at least 12 months. Anatomical outcomes were evaluated using otoscopic examination, and audiological outcomes were assessed using pure-tone audiometry. Multiple linear regression was performed to determine the association between clinical variables (age, sex, and comorbidities) and postoperative air–bone gap (ABG) gain. RESULTS: The graft uptake rates were 88.5% for SIS and 86% for perichondrium. Significant postoperative improvements in ABG were observed across all tested frequencies, with no significant differences between the two graft types. In the SIS group, patients younger than 65 years demonstrated significantly greater ABG gain compared with those aged 65 years or older (11.8 ± 8.3 dB vs. 5.8 ± 10.0 dB; p = 0.005). Sex and comorbidities were not associated with audiological outcomes. No major postoperative complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic tympanoplasty with SIS xenografts is a reliable and effective option for the repair of large tympanic membrane perforations, demonstrating high graft uptake rates and satisfactory postoperative hearing improvement.

内镜下鼓室成形术使用小肠粘膜下层异种移植物治疗大鼓膜穿孔:一项为期一年的回顾性队列研究,并进行临床随访。
背景:评价猪小肠粘膜下(SIS)异种移植物在内窥镜鼓室成形术中修复大鼓膜(TM)穿孔的解剖学和听力学结果。方法:本回顾性研究纳入102例经鼻内镜鼓室成形术的鼓膜穿孔患者,其中鼓膜穿孔超过50%的紧张部。其中小肠黏膜下层(SIS)移植52例,硬膜周移植50例。所有患者随访至少12个月。解剖结果用耳镜检查评估,听力学结果用纯音听力学评估。采用多元线性回归来确定临床变量(年龄、性别和合并症)与术后气骨间隙(ABG)增加之间的关系。结果:SIS移植物吸收率为88.5%,软骨膜为86%。所有测试频率均观察到ABG的术后显著改善,两种移植物类型之间无显著差异。在SIS组中,年龄小于65岁的患者与年龄大于65岁的患者相比,ABG增加显著增加(11.8±8.3 dB vs. 5.8±10.0 dB; p = 0.005)。性别和合并症与听力学结果无关。术后未见重大并发症。结论:内窥镜鼓室成形术与SIS异种移植物是修复大鼓膜穿孔的可靠和有效的选择,具有较高的移植物吸收率和令人满意的术后听力改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Head & Face Medicine
Head & Face Medicine DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
32
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Head & Face Medicine is a multidisciplinary open access journal that publishes basic and clinical research concerning all aspects of cranial, facial and oral conditions. The journal covers all aspects of cranial, facial and oral diseases and their management. It has been designed as a multidisciplinary journal for clinicians and researchers involved in the diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of diseases which affect the human head and face. The journal is wide-ranging, covering the development, aetiology, epidemiology and therapy of head and face diseases to the basic science that underlies these diseases. Management of head and face diseases includes all aspects of surgical and non-surgical treatments including psychopharmacological therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书