A rapid scoping review of antibiotic access and use barriers among refugee and migrant populations.

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Suzanne Garkay Naro, Michèle Palkovits, Arne Ruckert, Andrea Morales Caceres, Ranjana Nagi, Cordelia Chik, Steven J Hoffman, Susan Rogers Van Katwyk
{"title":"A rapid scoping review of antibiotic access and use barriers among refugee and migrant populations.","authors":"Suzanne Garkay Naro, Michèle Palkovits, Arne Ruckert, Andrea Morales Caceres, Ranjana Nagi, Cordelia Chik, Steven J Hoffman, Susan Rogers Van Katwyk","doi":"10.1186/s12992-026-01188-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antibiotic resistance (ABR) poses a significant global health and development threat from increasing globalization of travel, trade, and animal and human migration. ABR impacts refugees and migrants in unique ways due to increased exposure to infections and inequitable access to healthcare. The objective of this review is to synthesize the evidence on access to and appropriate use of antibiotics by migrants and refugees, identify the barriers they may experience in accessing and using antibiotics, and reflect on global policy entry points to modify such barriers considering the persistent globalization-related impacts on ABR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A global rapid scoping review was conducted to collect evidence on barriers to access and appropriate use of antibiotics among migrants and refugees. MEDLINE (Ovid), Scopus, Web of Science, CABI Global Health and the IGO Custom Search Engine were searched for academic and grey literature published in English, French, or Spanish from inception until September 22nd, 2025. A conceptual framework structured data extraction and thematic analysis of barriers to antibiotic use along the access pathway, including approachability, acceptability, availability, accommodation, affordability, and appropriateness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This review included 125 studies from an array of geographic locations. Migrants and refugees experience barriers along the continuum of care from both the patient and health-system side, impacting access to, and appropriate use of antibiotics. Limited access to resources, prevalence of certain social norms and values, health literacy and beliefs, and autonomy, can impact healthcare seeking and utilization. Health system barriers, such as location and affordability of services or language barriers, can also limit access and appropriate use of quality-assured antibiotics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Migrants and refugees face structural, financial, and systemic barriers in accessing and using antibiotics. While globalization processes have shaped the barriers migrants and refugees experience when accessing health services, access pathways are heterogeneous and influenced by the health systems of the host countries, and other contextual, non-health policies and factors. Potential policy solutions to mitigate these barriers include initiatives to address country-of-origin norms and values and improving language accessibility. Improved global policy coordination can also address access challenges for migrants and refugees, as tackling ABR requires collective global action.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":12747,"journal":{"name":"Globalization and Health","volume":" ","pages":"20"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12874966/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Globalization and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-026-01188-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Antibiotic resistance (ABR) poses a significant global health and development threat from increasing globalization of travel, trade, and animal and human migration. ABR impacts refugees and migrants in unique ways due to increased exposure to infections and inequitable access to healthcare. The objective of this review is to synthesize the evidence on access to and appropriate use of antibiotics by migrants and refugees, identify the barriers they may experience in accessing and using antibiotics, and reflect on global policy entry points to modify such barriers considering the persistent globalization-related impacts on ABR.

Methods: A global rapid scoping review was conducted to collect evidence on barriers to access and appropriate use of antibiotics among migrants and refugees. MEDLINE (Ovid), Scopus, Web of Science, CABI Global Health and the IGO Custom Search Engine were searched for academic and grey literature published in English, French, or Spanish from inception until September 22nd, 2025. A conceptual framework structured data extraction and thematic analysis of barriers to antibiotic use along the access pathway, including approachability, acceptability, availability, accommodation, affordability, and appropriateness.

Results: This review included 125 studies from an array of geographic locations. Migrants and refugees experience barriers along the continuum of care from both the patient and health-system side, impacting access to, and appropriate use of antibiotics. Limited access to resources, prevalence of certain social norms and values, health literacy and beliefs, and autonomy, can impact healthcare seeking and utilization. Health system barriers, such as location and affordability of services or language barriers, can also limit access and appropriate use of quality-assured antibiotics.

Conclusion: Migrants and refugees face structural, financial, and systemic barriers in accessing and using antibiotics. While globalization processes have shaped the barriers migrants and refugees experience when accessing health services, access pathways are heterogeneous and influenced by the health systems of the host countries, and other contextual, non-health policies and factors. Potential policy solutions to mitigate these barriers include initiatives to address country-of-origin norms and values and improving language accessibility. Improved global policy coordination can also address access challenges for migrants and refugees, as tackling ABR requires collective global action.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

对难民和移民人群抗生素获取和使用障碍的快速范围审查。
背景:由于旅行、贸易以及动物和人类迁徙的日益全球化,抗生素耐药性(ABR)对全球健康和发展构成了重大威胁。ABR以独特的方式影响难民和移民,因为他们更容易受到感染,获得医疗保健的机会也不公平。本综述的目的是综合移民和难民获取和适当使用抗生素的证据,确定他们在获取和使用抗生素方面可能遇到的障碍,并考虑到全球化对抗菌素耐药性的持续影响,反思全球政策切入点,以修改这些障碍。方法:进行了一项全球快速范围审查,以收集有关移民和难民获取和适当使用抗生素障碍的证据。对MEDLINE (Ovid)、Scopus、Web of Science、CABI Global Health和IGO自定义搜索引擎进行了搜索,检索了从成立到2025年9月22日以英语、法语或西班牙语发表的学术文献和灰色文献。一个概念性框架结构化数据提取和专题分析沿获取途径的抗生素使用障碍,包括可接近性、可接受性、可获得性、便利、可负担性和适当性。结果:本综述包括来自一系列地理位置的125项研究。移民和难民在患者和卫生系统方面的连续护理过程中遇到障碍,影响了抗生素的获取和适当使用。有限的资源获取、某些社会规范和价值观的流行、健康素养和信仰以及自主性,都可能影响医疗保健的寻求和利用。卫生系统的障碍,如服务的地点和可负担性或语言障碍,也可能限制获得和适当使用有质量保证的抗生素。结论:移民和难民在获取和使用抗生素方面面临结构性、财务和系统性障碍。虽然全球化进程造成了移徙者和难民在获得卫生服务时遇到的障碍,但获得途径是多种多样的,并受到东道国卫生系统以及其他情境、非卫生政策和因素的影响。缓解这些障碍的潜在政策解决方案包括解决原产国规范和价值观以及改善语言可及性的举措。改善全球政策协调也可以解决移民和难民的准入挑战,因为解决ABR问题需要全球集体行动。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Globalization and Health
Globalization and Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
18.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: "Globalization and Health" is a pioneering transdisciplinary journal dedicated to situating public health and well-being within the dynamic forces of global development. The journal is committed to publishing high-quality, original research that explores the impact of globalization processes on global public health. This includes examining how globalization influences health systems and the social, economic, commercial, and political determinants of health. The journal welcomes contributions from various disciplines, including policy, health systems, political economy, international relations, and community perspectives. While single-country studies are accepted, they must emphasize global/globalization mechanisms and their relevance to global-level policy discourse and decision-making.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书