Anticipatory Methods for the Emergence of Radically New Technologies: Navigating Uncertainty

Barbara L. van Veen, J. Roland Ortt
{"title":"Anticipatory Methods for the Emergence of Radically New Technologies: Navigating Uncertainty","authors":"Barbara L. van Veen,&nbsp;J. Roland Ortt","doi":"10.1002/ffo2.70035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Anticipating the emergence of radically new technologies poses significant methodological challenges due to high uncertainty surrounding their development and diffusion. Conventional forecasting approaches, which rely on stable relationships and historical data extrapolation, are often ill-suited to such conditions. This editorial examines how different anticipatory methods address uncertainty and what this implies for method selection in technology foresight. Drawing on four case studies—quantum technologies in healthcare, fusion energy, defense technologies, and the emergence of technology clusters—the special issue compares horizon scanning, scenario planning, Delphi-based expert elicitation, and computational weak-signal analysis. Using an emerging-technology framework that treats uncertainty as a defining and evolving attribute rather than a temporary knowledge gap, the editorial shows that method suitability depends on the nature and degree of uncertainty; the time horizon becomes meaningful only under specific uncertainty conditions. Foresight methods that structure exploration across multiple plausible futures remain applicable across uncertainty contexts, whereas forecasting is conditionally applicable and depends on predominantly epistemic uncertainty. The comparison further demonstrates that each method has structural limitations, underscoring the need for strategic combinations under higher uncertainty. By positioning uncertainty as the central organizing principle for methodological choice, this editorial contributes to futures and foresight research and offers guidance for designing anticipatory approaches that remain robust under radical uncertainty.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100567,"journal":{"name":"FUTURES & FORESIGHT SCIENCE","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ffo2.70035","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FUTURES & FORESIGHT SCIENCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/ftr/10.1002/ffo2.70035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anticipating the emergence of radically new technologies poses significant methodological challenges due to high uncertainty surrounding their development and diffusion. Conventional forecasting approaches, which rely on stable relationships and historical data extrapolation, are often ill-suited to such conditions. This editorial examines how different anticipatory methods address uncertainty and what this implies for method selection in technology foresight. Drawing on four case studies—quantum technologies in healthcare, fusion energy, defense technologies, and the emergence of technology clusters—the special issue compares horizon scanning, scenario planning, Delphi-based expert elicitation, and computational weak-signal analysis. Using an emerging-technology framework that treats uncertainty as a defining and evolving attribute rather than a temporary knowledge gap, the editorial shows that method suitability depends on the nature and degree of uncertainty; the time horizon becomes meaningful only under specific uncertainty conditions. Foresight methods that structure exploration across multiple plausible futures remain applicable across uncertainty contexts, whereas forecasting is conditionally applicable and depends on predominantly epistemic uncertainty. The comparison further demonstrates that each method has structural limitations, underscoring the need for strategic combinations under higher uncertainty. By positioning uncertainty as the central organizing principle for methodological choice, this editorial contributes to futures and foresight research and offers guidance for designing anticipatory approaches that remain robust under radical uncertainty.

新技术出现的预期方法:导航不确定性
由于围绕其发展和扩散的高度不确定性,预测全新技术的出现带来了重大的方法论挑战。传统的预测方法依赖于稳定的关系和历史数据外推,往往不适合这种情况。这篇社论探讨了不同的预测方法如何处理不确定性,以及这对技术预见中的方法选择意味着什么。利用四个案例研究——医疗保健领域的量子技术、聚变能、国防技术和技术集群的出现——本期特刊比较了水平扫描、场景规划、基于delphi的专家启发和计算弱信号分析。使用新兴技术框架,将不确定性视为一个定义和不断发展的属性,而不是一个暂时的知识差距,该社论表明,方法的适用性取决于不确定性的性质和程度;只有在特定的不确定性条件下,时间范围才有意义。预见方法是在多个可能的未来之间进行结构探索,在不确定性背景下仍然适用,而预测是有条件适用的,主要取决于认知的不确定性。对比进一步表明,每种方法都存在结构性限制,强调了在更高不确定性下进行战略组合的必要性。通过将不确定性定位为方法论选择的中心组织原则,这篇社论为未来和前瞻研究做出了贡献,并为设计在极端不确定性下保持稳健的预期方法提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书