Policy pathways for autonomous shuttle adoption: Insights from UK focus groups

IF 6.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Transport Policy Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-22 DOI:10.1016/j.tranpol.2026.104026
Hisham Y. Makahleh , Rachel Johnson , Matthew Shelton , Emma J.S. Ferranti , Christopher D.F. Rogers
{"title":"Policy pathways for autonomous shuttle adoption: Insights from UK focus groups","authors":"Hisham Y. Makahleh ,&nbsp;Rachel Johnson ,&nbsp;Matthew Shelton ,&nbsp;Emma J.S. Ferranti ,&nbsp;Christopher D.F. Rogers","doi":"10.1016/j.tranpol.2026.104026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Autonomous shuttles (AS) are positioned as environmentally sustainable first/last-mile mobility solutions, but deployments in the UK have so far been limited to short-term pilots. Although the Automated Vehicles Act 2024 has set out a regulatory framework for the future, continuing public trust, safety, accessibility, and governance issues constrain their longer-term take-up. This study explores such issues through four focus group discussions (n = 25) with local people living in the West Midlands, UK. Focus groups were held with users during a real-world trial at the National Exhibition Centre. A hybrid framework–thematic analysis was employed to explore both anticipated and emergent accounts. Key barriers included safety and reliability, low awareness and visibility, current lack of range and performance, issues with accessibility, and data privacy concerns. Enablers included AS being seen as good for the environment, a fun and novel experience, and the influence of peers. Acceptance of AS was also reported to be conditional on an operator being on board to reassure passengers. This study is among the first to link UK public perceptions during an operational AS trial with the emerging regulatory environment under the Automated Vehicles Act 2024. The real-world trial setting and inclusion of underrepresented users, including disabled participants, offer insights that extend beyond hypothetical acceptance studies. This is one of the earliest UK focus-group studies explicitly connecting lived trial experience to emerging AS policy pathways, and shows public accounts are less about the technical readiness of AS and more about their governance, integration, and service design. These insights are exploratory and reflect depth rather than statistical generalisation due to the qualitative design and sample size.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48378,"journal":{"name":"Transport Policy","volume":"180 ","pages":"Article 104026"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X26000363","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Autonomous shuttles (AS) are positioned as environmentally sustainable first/last-mile mobility solutions, but deployments in the UK have so far been limited to short-term pilots. Although the Automated Vehicles Act 2024 has set out a regulatory framework for the future, continuing public trust, safety, accessibility, and governance issues constrain their longer-term take-up. This study explores such issues through four focus group discussions (n = 25) with local people living in the West Midlands, UK. Focus groups were held with users during a real-world trial at the National Exhibition Centre. A hybrid framework–thematic analysis was employed to explore both anticipated and emergent accounts. Key barriers included safety and reliability, low awareness and visibility, current lack of range and performance, issues with accessibility, and data privacy concerns. Enablers included AS being seen as good for the environment, a fun and novel experience, and the influence of peers. Acceptance of AS was also reported to be conditional on an operator being on board to reassure passengers. This study is among the first to link UK public perceptions during an operational AS trial with the emerging regulatory environment under the Automated Vehicles Act 2024. The real-world trial setting and inclusion of underrepresented users, including disabled participants, offer insights that extend beyond hypothetical acceptance studies. This is one of the earliest UK focus-group studies explicitly connecting lived trial experience to emerging AS policy pathways, and shows public accounts are less about the technical readiness of AS and more about their governance, integration, and service design. These insights are exploratory and reflect depth rather than statistical generalisation due to the qualitative design and sample size.
采用自动驾驶班车的政策路径:来自英国焦点小组的见解
自动驾驶班车(AS)被定位为环境可持续的第一/最后一英里移动解决方案,但到目前为止,在英国的部署仅限于短期试点。尽管《2024年自动驾驶汽车法案》为未来制定了监管框架,但持续的公众信任、安全、可及性和治理问题限制了它们的长期应用。本研究通过四个焦点小组讨论(n = 25)与居住在英国西米德兰兹郡的当地人探讨了这些问题。在国家展览中心进行的实际试验中,与用户进行了焦点小组讨论。采用混合框架-主题分析来探索预期和紧急账户。主要障碍包括安全性和可靠性、低意识和可见性、目前缺乏范围和性能、可访问性问题以及数据隐私问题。促成因素包括被视为对环境有益,有趣和新颖的体验,以及同伴的影响。据报道,接受AS的条件还包括有运营商在飞机上安抚乘客。这项研究是第一个将英国公众在运营自动驾驶系统试验期间的看法与《2024年自动驾驶汽车法案》下新兴的监管环境联系起来的研究之一。真实世界的试验设置和纳入代表性不足的用户,包括残疾参与者,提供了超越假设接受性研究的见解。这是英国最早的焦点小组研究之一,明确地将生活试验经验与新兴的AS政策途径联系起来,并表明公共帐户较少关注AS的技术准备情况,而更多地关注其治理,集成和服务设计。这些见解是探索性的,反映了深度,而不是由于定性设计和样本量的统计概括。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transport Policy
Transport Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
282
期刊介绍: Transport Policy is an international journal aimed at bridging the gap between theory and practice in transport. Its subject areas reflect the concerns of policymakers in government, industry, voluntary organisations and the public at large, providing independent, original and rigorous analysis to understand how policy decisions have been taken, monitor their effects, and suggest how they may be improved. The journal treats the transport sector comprehensively, and in the context of other sectors including energy, housing, industry and planning. All modes are covered: land, sea and air; road and rail; public and private; motorised and non-motorised; passenger and freight.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书