Hisham Y. Makahleh , Rachel Johnson , Matthew Shelton , Emma J.S. Ferranti , Christopher D.F. Rogers
{"title":"Policy pathways for autonomous shuttle adoption: Insights from UK focus groups","authors":"Hisham Y. Makahleh , Rachel Johnson , Matthew Shelton , Emma J.S. Ferranti , Christopher D.F. Rogers","doi":"10.1016/j.tranpol.2026.104026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Autonomous shuttles (AS) are positioned as environmentally sustainable first/last-mile mobility solutions, but deployments in the UK have so far been limited to short-term pilots. Although the Automated Vehicles Act 2024 has set out a regulatory framework for the future, continuing public trust, safety, accessibility, and governance issues constrain their longer-term take-up. This study explores such issues through four focus group discussions (n = 25) with local people living in the West Midlands, UK. Focus groups were held with users during a real-world trial at the National Exhibition Centre. A hybrid framework–thematic analysis was employed to explore both anticipated and emergent accounts. Key barriers included safety and reliability, low awareness and visibility, current lack of range and performance, issues with accessibility, and data privacy concerns. Enablers included AS being seen as good for the environment, a fun and novel experience, and the influence of peers. Acceptance of AS was also reported to be conditional on an operator being on board to reassure passengers. This study is among the first to link UK public perceptions during an operational AS trial with the emerging regulatory environment under the Automated Vehicles Act 2024. The real-world trial setting and inclusion of underrepresented users, including disabled participants, offer insights that extend beyond hypothetical acceptance studies. This is one of the earliest UK focus-group studies explicitly connecting lived trial experience to emerging AS policy pathways, and shows public accounts are less about the technical readiness of AS and more about their governance, integration, and service design. These insights are exploratory and reflect depth rather than statistical generalisation due to the qualitative design and sample size.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48378,"journal":{"name":"Transport Policy","volume":"180 ","pages":"Article 104026"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X26000363","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Autonomous shuttles (AS) are positioned as environmentally sustainable first/last-mile mobility solutions, but deployments in the UK have so far been limited to short-term pilots. Although the Automated Vehicles Act 2024 has set out a regulatory framework for the future, continuing public trust, safety, accessibility, and governance issues constrain their longer-term take-up. This study explores such issues through four focus group discussions (n = 25) with local people living in the West Midlands, UK. Focus groups were held with users during a real-world trial at the National Exhibition Centre. A hybrid framework–thematic analysis was employed to explore both anticipated and emergent accounts. Key barriers included safety and reliability, low awareness and visibility, current lack of range and performance, issues with accessibility, and data privacy concerns. Enablers included AS being seen as good for the environment, a fun and novel experience, and the influence of peers. Acceptance of AS was also reported to be conditional on an operator being on board to reassure passengers. This study is among the first to link UK public perceptions during an operational AS trial with the emerging regulatory environment under the Automated Vehicles Act 2024. The real-world trial setting and inclusion of underrepresented users, including disabled participants, offer insights that extend beyond hypothetical acceptance studies. This is one of the earliest UK focus-group studies explicitly connecting lived trial experience to emerging AS policy pathways, and shows public accounts are less about the technical readiness of AS and more about their governance, integration, and service design. These insights are exploratory and reflect depth rather than statistical generalisation due to the qualitative design and sample size.
期刊介绍:
Transport Policy is an international journal aimed at bridging the gap between theory and practice in transport. Its subject areas reflect the concerns of policymakers in government, industry, voluntary organisations and the public at large, providing independent, original and rigorous analysis to understand how policy decisions have been taken, monitor their effects, and suggest how they may be improved. The journal treats the transport sector comprehensively, and in the context of other sectors including energy, housing, industry and planning. All modes are covered: land, sea and air; road and rail; public and private; motorised and non-motorised; passenger and freight.