Comprehensive efficiency analysis of ports in South Korea: An evaluation of operational, safety, and environmental competencies

IF 4.8 2区工程技术 Q2 BUSINESS

Research in Transportation Business and Management Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-29 DOI:10.1016/j.rtbm.2026.101614

Min-Seop Sim , Yul-Seong Kim , Chang-Hee Lee

{"title":"Comprehensive efficiency analysis of ports in South Korea: An evaluation of operational, safety, and environmental competencies","authors":"Min-Seop Sim , Yul-Seong Kim , Chang-Hee Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.rtbm.2026.101614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As departure and arrival points for all modes of maritime transport, ports are pivotal to Korea's economic growth. Additionally, there is currently global discourse on enhancing the eco-friendliness of all ports and implementing safe working environments. However, despite these changing trends and social consensus, comprehensive research on port efficiency that considers a range of factors is scarce. Therefore, this study analyzes the comprehensive efficiency of Korean state-managed trade ports by evaluating it on the basis of three areas: operational efficiency, safety efficiency, and environmental efficiency. It also identifies each port's strengths and weaknesses through portfolio analysis and establishes operational strategies. The study employed a slacks-based measure data envelopment analysis and an undesirable output model to analyze overall efficiency. The findings identify Busan Port, Ulsan Port, and Yeosu–Gwangyang Port as the most efficient ports in all three areas. Further, the portfolio analysis indicates that Gunsan and Daesan ports strongly emphasize safety, whereas Incheon Port would benefit from implementing a marketing strategy that emphasizes eco-friendliness. Finally, Pohang Port, Masan Port, Mokpo Port, and Donghae and Mukho Port were found to deviate from the standards of safety and eco-friendly port operations. These findings have significant implications for the operational strategies and competitive advantage strategies of Korean ports.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47453,"journal":{"name":"Research in Transportation Business and Management","volume":"66 ","pages":"Article 101614"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Transportation Business and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210539526000209","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

As departure and arrival points for all modes of maritime transport, ports are pivotal to Korea's economic growth. Additionally, there is currently global discourse on enhancing the eco-friendliness of all ports and implementing safe working environments. However, despite these changing trends and social consensus, comprehensive research on port efficiency that considers a range of factors is scarce. Therefore, this study analyzes the comprehensive efficiency of Korean state-managed trade ports by evaluating it on the basis of three areas: operational efficiency, safety efficiency, and environmental efficiency. It also identifies each port's strengths and weaknesses through portfolio analysis and establishes operational strategies. The study employed a slacks-based measure data envelopment analysis and an undesirable output model to analyze overall efficiency. The findings identify Busan Port, Ulsan Port, and Yeosu–Gwangyang Port as the most efficient ports in all three areas. Further, the portfolio analysis indicates that Gunsan and Daesan ports strongly emphasize safety, whereas Incheon Port would benefit from implementing a marketing strategy that emphasizes eco-friendliness. Finally, Pohang Port, Masan Port, Mokpo Port, and Donghae and Mukho Port were found to deviate from the standards of safety and eco-friendly port operations. These findings have significant implications for the operational strategies and competitive advantage strategies of Korean ports.

查看原文本刊更多论文

韩国港口综合效率分析：运营、安全和环境能力评估

作为各种海运方式的出发和到达点，港口对韩国经济增长至关重要。此外，目前全球都在讨论加强所有港口的生态友好性和实施安全的工作环境。然而，尽管有这些变化趋势和社会共识，但考虑一系列因素的港口效率综合研究很少。因此，本研究从运营效率、安全效率、环境效率三个方面对韩国国营贸易港口的综合效率进行了评价。它还通过投资组合分析确定每个港口的优势和劣势，并建立操作策略。本研究采用基于松弛测度的数据包络分析和不良产出模型对整体效率进行分析。调查结果显示，釜山港、蔚山港、丽水光阳港是三个地区效率最高的港口。此外，综合分析结果显示，群山港和大山港强调安全，而仁川港如果实施强调生态友好的营销战略，将会受益。最后，浦项港、马山港、木浦港、东海港、木湖港等被认定为不符合安全环保港口运营标准的港口。这些发现对韩国港口的经营战略和竞争优势战略具有重要意义。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Research in Transportation Business and Management Multiple-

CiteScore

7.10

自引率

8.30%

发文量

175

期刊介绍： Research in Transportation Business & Management (RTBM) will publish research on international aspects of transport management such as business strategy, communication, sustainability, finance, human resource management, law, logistics, marketing, franchising, privatisation and commercialisation. Research in Transportation Business & Management welcomes proposals for themed volumes from scholars in management, in relation to all modes of transport. Issues should be cross-disciplinary for one mode or single-disciplinary for all modes. We are keen to receive proposals that combine and integrate theories and concepts that are taken from or can be traced to origins in different disciplines or lessons learned from different modes and approaches to the topic. By facilitating the development of interdisciplinary or intermodal concepts, theories and ideas, and by synthesizing these for the journal''s audience, we seek to contribute to both scholarly advancement of knowledge and the state of managerial practice. Potential volume themes include: -Sustainability and Transportation Management- Transport Management and the Reduction of Transport''s Carbon Footprint- Marketing Transport/Branding Transportation- Benchmarking, Performance Measurement and Best Practices in Transport Operations- Franchising, Concessions and Alternate Governance Mechanisms for Transport Organisations- Logistics and the Integration of Transportation into Freight Supply Chains- Risk Management (or Asset Management or Transportation Finance or ...): Lessons from Multiple Modes- Engaging the Stakeholder in Transportation Governance- Reliability in the Freight Sector