Some and or in second language acquisition: Exploring linguistic and cognitive factors

IF 2.2 1区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Journal of Pragmatics Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-30 DOI:10.1016/j.pragma.2026.01.004
Shuyan Wang , Shaohua Fang
{"title":"Some and or in second language acquisition: Exploring linguistic and cognitive factors","authors":"Shuyan Wang ,&nbsp;Shaohua Fang","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2026.01.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates how Mandarin-speaking learners of English (L2) generate scalar implicatures (SIs) involving the quantifier <em>some</em> and the disjunctive <em>or</em>, compared to native English speakers (L1). It further explores the influence of linguistic (L2 proficiency) and cognitive (working memory, inhibitory control) factors on interpreting SIs in L2. Using the covered-box paradigm—a modified picture selection task with reduced meta-linguistic demands—we tested Chinese-speaking L2 learners and native English speakers on their interpretations of sentences containing <em>some</em> and <em>or</em>. Results showed no significant differences between L1 and L2 participants in the overall rate of rejecting under-informative statements for either scalar expression, although both groups rejected significantly more under-informative statements containing <em>or</em> than those containing <em>some</em>. Importantly, the L2 learners displayed less tolerance to the violation of ignorance inference with the disjunctive <em>or</em>. Cognitive and linguistic factors showed limited effects on SI performance: neither working memory nor L2 proficiency predicted SI performance, and inhibitory control only showed marginal effect in certain conditions. These findings support the view that SIs can be achieved in a native-like manner by L2 learners. They further underscore the importance of considering both scale type and individual cognitive capacities in models of pragmatic acquisition in L2.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"254 ","pages":"Pages 105-121"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216626000123","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates how Mandarin-speaking learners of English (L2) generate scalar implicatures (SIs) involving the quantifier some and the disjunctive or, compared to native English speakers (L1). It further explores the influence of linguistic (L2 proficiency) and cognitive (working memory, inhibitory control) factors on interpreting SIs in L2. Using the covered-box paradigm—a modified picture selection task with reduced meta-linguistic demands—we tested Chinese-speaking L2 learners and native English speakers on their interpretations of sentences containing some and or. Results showed no significant differences between L1 and L2 participants in the overall rate of rejecting under-informative statements for either scalar expression, although both groups rejected significantly more under-informative statements containing or than those containing some. Importantly, the L2 learners displayed less tolerance to the violation of ignorance inference with the disjunctive or. Cognitive and linguistic factors showed limited effects on SI performance: neither working memory nor L2 proficiency predicted SI performance, and inhibitory control only showed marginal effect in certain conditions. These findings support the view that SIs can be achieved in a native-like manner by L2 learners. They further underscore the importance of considering both scale type and individual cognitive capacities in models of pragmatic acquisition in L2.
第二语言习得中的一些或一些:语言和认知因素的探讨
本研究调查了普通话英语学习者(L2)与母语英语学习者(L1)相比,如何产生涉及量词some和析取词or的标量含意(si)。进一步探讨了语言(二语熟练程度)和认知(工作记忆、抑制控制)因素对二语口译的影响。我们使用盖盒范式——一种减少元语言需求的改进图片选择任务——测试了说汉语的第二语言学习者和母语为英语的人对含有some和or的句子的解释。结果显示,L1和L2参与者在拒绝任何标量表达式的信息不足陈述的总体比率上没有显着差异,尽管两组拒绝含有或的信息不足陈述的比例明显高于含有或的信息不足陈述。重要的是,二语学习者对断取词或违反无知推理的容忍度较低。认知和语言因素对SI表现的影响有限:工作记忆和二语熟练程度都不能预测SI表现,抑制控制仅在某些条件下显示边际效应。这些发现支持了这样一种观点,即第二语言学习者可以以类似母语的方式实现si。他们进一步强调了在二语语用习得模型中同时考虑量表类型和个体认知能力的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
18.80%
发文量
219
期刊介绍: Since 1977, the Journal of Pragmatics has provided a forum for bringing together a wide range of research in pragmatics, including cognitive pragmatics, corpus pragmatics, experimental pragmatics, historical pragmatics, interpersonal pragmatics, multimodal pragmatics, sociopragmatics, theoretical pragmatics and related fields. Our aim is to publish innovative pragmatic scholarship from all perspectives, which contributes to theories of how speakers produce and interpret language in different contexts drawing on attested data from a wide range of languages/cultures in different parts of the world. The Journal of Pragmatics also encourages work that uses attested language data to explore the relationship between pragmatics and neighbouring research areas such as semantics, discourse analysis, conversation analysis and ethnomethodology, interactional linguistics, sociolinguistics, linguistic anthropology, media studies, psychology, sociology, and the philosophy of language. Alongside full-length articles, discussion notes and book reviews, the journal welcomes proposals for high quality special issues in all areas of pragmatics which make a significant contribution to a topical or developing area at the cutting-edge of research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书