Cogeneration system utilizing geothermal energy: Energy, exergy, economic and environmental analyses and multi-objective optimization

IF 9.5 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Energy nexus Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-10 DOI:10.1016/j.nexus.2026.100642
Hassan Hajabdollahi, Mohsen Abooli Pour, Mohammad Shafiey Dehaj
{"title":"Cogeneration system utilizing geothermal energy: Energy, exergy, economic and environmental analyses and multi-objective optimization","authors":"Hassan Hajabdollahi,&nbsp;Mohsen Abooli Pour,&nbsp;Mohammad Shafiey Dehaj","doi":"10.1016/j.nexus.2026.100642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A comprehensive energy, exergy, economic, and exergoeconomic analyses was performed on a geothermal-based cogeneration system designed for the simultaneous production of hydrogen, oxygen, and freshwater. The system comprises three principal subsystems: a dual-pressure organic Rankine cycle for power generation, a reverse osmosis desalination unit for freshwater production, and a proton exchange membrane electrolyzer for hydrogen and oxygen generation. The system optimization was carried out using a non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm with the objective of minimizing the total exergy destruction cost rate while maximizing freshwater output. The results indicate that the organic Rankine cycle is responsible for the largest share of exergy destruction, accounting for approximately 61 % of the total, whereas the proton exchange membrane electrolyzer contributes about 65 % of the total exergy destruction cost rate. From an exergoeconomic perspective, the high-pressure turbine demonstrated the highest exergoeconomic factor, implying that its exergy destruction is relatively low compared to its associated investment cost. The overall exergy efficiency of the system and the corresponding payback period were estimated to be 23.81 % and 7.04 years, respectively, confirming the technical feasibility and economic viability of the proposed configuration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93548,"journal":{"name":"Energy nexus","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100642"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy nexus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772427126000148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A comprehensive energy, exergy, economic, and exergoeconomic analyses was performed on a geothermal-based cogeneration system designed for the simultaneous production of hydrogen, oxygen, and freshwater. The system comprises three principal subsystems: a dual-pressure organic Rankine cycle for power generation, a reverse osmosis desalination unit for freshwater production, and a proton exchange membrane electrolyzer for hydrogen and oxygen generation. The system optimization was carried out using a non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm with the objective of minimizing the total exergy destruction cost rate while maximizing freshwater output. The results indicate that the organic Rankine cycle is responsible for the largest share of exergy destruction, accounting for approximately 61 % of the total, whereas the proton exchange membrane electrolyzer contributes about 65 % of the total exergy destruction cost rate. From an exergoeconomic perspective, the high-pressure turbine demonstrated the highest exergoeconomic factor, implying that its exergy destruction is relatively low compared to its associated investment cost. The overall exergy efficiency of the system and the corresponding payback period were estimated to be 23.81 % and 7.04 years, respectively, confirming the technical feasibility and economic viability of the proposed configuration.
地热热电联产系统:能源、能源、经济和环境分析及多目标优化
对设计用于同时生产氢、氧和淡水的地热热电联产系统进行了全面的能源、能源、经济和燃烧经济分析。该系统包括三个主要子系统:用于发电的双压力有机朗肯循环,用于生产淡水的反渗透脱盐装置,以及用于生产氢气和氧气的质子交换膜电解槽。采用非支配排序遗传算法对系统进行优化,以最小化总火用破坏代价率和最大化淡水产量为目标。结果表明,有机朗肯循环的火用破坏成本最大,约占总成本的61%,而质子交换膜电解槽的火用破坏成本约占总成本的65%。从火用经济角度来看,高压涡轮的火用经济系数最高,这意味着其火用破坏相对于相关投资成本相对较低。系统的总效率和相应的投资回收期分别为23.81%和7.04年,证实了所建议配置的技术可行性和经济可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy nexus
Energy nexus Energy (General), Ecological Modelling, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Water Science and Technology, Agricultural and Biological Sciences (General)
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
109 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书