Experimental evaluation and theoretical prediction of single hardwood dowel connections in softwood and hardwood

IF 7.6 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Engineering Structures Pub Date : 2026-04-15 Epub Date: 2026-01-29 DOI:10.1016/j.engstruct.2026.122251
Inayat Ullah Khan , Mahbube Subhani , Kazem Ghabraie , Mahmud Ashraf
{"title":"Experimental evaluation and theoretical prediction of single hardwood dowel connections in softwood and hardwood","authors":"Inayat Ullah Khan ,&nbsp;Mahbube Subhani ,&nbsp;Kazem Ghabraie ,&nbsp;Mahmud Ashraf","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2026.122251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents a comprehensive evaluation of single wooden dowel double-shear joints tested under compression loading parallel to the grain. Tasmanian Oak (a premium Australian native hardwood) was used as the dowel material, while Spotted Gum (a high-density native hardwood) and Radiata Pine (the most widely planted softwood in Australia) were used as the timber members. Wooden dowel timber-to-timber connections (WDTCs) exhibited initial elastic embedment of the dowel, followed by mixed-mode failure involving tensile bending and tensile shear. These failure modes are not accounted for in the yield limit equations of the National Design Specification (NDS) or Eurocode 5, resulting in inaccurate predictions of stiffness and load capacity for WDTCs. There is limited research on mechanics-based modelling of WDTC stiffness and capacity. In this study, several theoretical models were refined, adapted, or newly developed to predict joint stiffness, yield load, and maximum load capacity. These include beam-on-elastic-foundation models, spring-in-series models, post-test deformation–based models, embedment stiffness-based model and Johnson theory–based models for both uniform and non-uniform stress distributions. All these models are assessed against the current WDTC test data. The capacities were also compared with the new Eurocode 5 proposed yield-limit equation for WDTCs. Complementary tests, including embedment of timber with steel and wooden dowels, isolated dowel embedment, and dowel bending, were conducted to improve understanding of WDTCs behaviour and to provide input parameters for the theoretical models. The refined and newly developed mechanics-based models can be applied either independently or in conjunction with NDS models for WDTCs design.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"353 ","pages":"Article 122251"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029626001641","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive evaluation of single wooden dowel double-shear joints tested under compression loading parallel to the grain. Tasmanian Oak (a premium Australian native hardwood) was used as the dowel material, while Spotted Gum (a high-density native hardwood) and Radiata Pine (the most widely planted softwood in Australia) were used as the timber members. Wooden dowel timber-to-timber connections (WDTCs) exhibited initial elastic embedment of the dowel, followed by mixed-mode failure involving tensile bending and tensile shear. These failure modes are not accounted for in the yield limit equations of the National Design Specification (NDS) or Eurocode 5, resulting in inaccurate predictions of stiffness and load capacity for WDTCs. There is limited research on mechanics-based modelling of WDTC stiffness and capacity. In this study, several theoretical models were refined, adapted, or newly developed to predict joint stiffness, yield load, and maximum load capacity. These include beam-on-elastic-foundation models, spring-in-series models, post-test deformation–based models, embedment stiffness-based model and Johnson theory–based models for both uniform and non-uniform stress distributions. All these models are assessed against the current WDTC test data. The capacities were also compared with the new Eurocode 5 proposed yield-limit equation for WDTCs. Complementary tests, including embedment of timber with steel and wooden dowels, isolated dowel embedment, and dowel bending, were conducted to improve understanding of WDTCs behaviour and to provide input parameters for the theoretical models. The refined and newly developed mechanics-based models can be applied either independently or in conjunction with NDS models for WDTCs design.
软、硬木单钉连接的试验评价与理论预测
本文对平行于木纹的压缩荷载作用下的单木榫双剪节点进行了综合评价。塔斯马尼亚橡木(一种优质的澳大利亚本土硬木)被用作定位材料,而斑点胶(一种高密度的本土硬木)和辐射松(澳大利亚最广泛种植的软木)被用作木材成员。木榫木-木连接(wdtc)表现出初始弹性嵌入,随后出现拉伸弯曲和拉伸剪切的混合模式破坏。这些失效模式没有在国家设计规范(NDS)或欧洲规范5的屈服极限方程中考虑,导致wdtc的刚度和承载能力预测不准确。基于力学的WDTC刚度和承载力建模研究有限。在这项研究中,几个理论模型被改进、改编或新开发,以预测关节刚度、屈服载荷和最大载荷能力。这些模型包括弹性基础梁模型、弹簧系列模型、基于测试后变形的模型、基于嵌入刚度的模型以及基于均匀和非均匀应力分布的Johnson理论模型。所有这些模型都是根据当前WDTC测试数据进行评估的。还将这些容量与新的欧洲法规5提出的wdtc产量限制方程进行了比较。补充试验,包括用钢和木销子预埋木材、隔离销子预埋和销子弯曲,以提高对wdtc行为的理解,并为理论模型提供输入参数。经过改进和新开发的基于力学的模型既可以单独应用,也可以与NDS模型结合使用,用于wdtc的设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Engineering Structures
Engineering Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
14.50%
发文量
1385
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed. The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering. Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels. Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书