Oguz Uzdil , Sinan Melih Nigdeli , Turgay Cosgun , Gebrail Bekdaş
{"title":"Seismic vulnerability assessment and performance improvement of the historical Mehmet Arif Pasha Mansion using optimized tuned mass dampers","authors":"Oguz Uzdil , Sinan Melih Nigdeli , Turgay Cosgun , Gebrail Bekdaş","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2026.122247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the effectiveness of tuned mass dampers (TMDs) as a non-intrusive seismic mitigation strategy for a historical masonry structure within a performance-based assessment framework. The novelty of the study lies in the systematic, code-consistent evaluation of both classical Den Hartog–tuned and optimally parameterized TMDs for masonry structures under multiple seismic hazard levels (DD-1, DD-2, and DD-3), with explicit consideration of mass-ratio sensitivity. Linear time-history and nonlinear analyses are performed for TMD mass ratios of 3 %, 5 %, 10 %, and 20 %. The results indicate consistent reductions in relative floor displacement rates and collapse indicators across all earthquake levels. At the DD-3 earthquake level, collapse rate reductions of up to 50 % are observed for mass ratios between 3 % and 10 %, increasing to approximately 60–68 % for a 20 % mass ratio. Time-history analyses show that the most efficient displacement reduction occurs at a 5 % mass ratio, with decreases of 0.33 % in the x-direction and 1.20 % in the y-direction, while higher mass ratios provide diminishing additional benefits. Nonlinear analyses further confirm reductions in relative floor displacement rates of 0.20–0.34 %, particularly on the second normal floor. The findings demonstrate that performance-based optimization enables an effective and balanced application of passive vibration control for historical masonry structures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"353 ","pages":"Article 122247"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029626001604","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study examines the effectiveness of tuned mass dampers (TMDs) as a non-intrusive seismic mitigation strategy for a historical masonry structure within a performance-based assessment framework. The novelty of the study lies in the systematic, code-consistent evaluation of both classical Den Hartog–tuned and optimally parameterized TMDs for masonry structures under multiple seismic hazard levels (DD-1, DD-2, and DD-3), with explicit consideration of mass-ratio sensitivity. Linear time-history and nonlinear analyses are performed for TMD mass ratios of 3 %, 5 %, 10 %, and 20 %. The results indicate consistent reductions in relative floor displacement rates and collapse indicators across all earthquake levels. At the DD-3 earthquake level, collapse rate reductions of up to 50 % are observed for mass ratios between 3 % and 10 %, increasing to approximately 60–68 % for a 20 % mass ratio. Time-history analyses show that the most efficient displacement reduction occurs at a 5 % mass ratio, with decreases of 0.33 % in the x-direction and 1.20 % in the y-direction, while higher mass ratios provide diminishing additional benefits. Nonlinear analyses further confirm reductions in relative floor displacement rates of 0.20–0.34 %, particularly on the second normal floor. The findings demonstrate that performance-based optimization enables an effective and balanced application of passive vibration control for historical masonry structures.
期刊介绍:
Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed.
The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering.
Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels.
Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.