Bird species richness peaks at intermediate levels of farmland in wooded savannas and dry forests, but not in rainforests

IF 4.2 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Basic and Applied Ecology Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-29 DOI:10.1016/j.baae.2025.12.013
Vera Soares , Maria João Canadas , Paulo Flores Ribeiro , Natasha Ribeiro , José Lima Santos
{"title":"Bird species richness peaks at intermediate levels of farmland in wooded savannas and dry forests, but not in rainforests","authors":"Vera Soares ,&nbsp;Maria João Canadas ,&nbsp;Paulo Flores Ribeiro ,&nbsp;Natasha Ribeiro ,&nbsp;José Lima Santos","doi":"10.1016/j.baae.2025.12.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite widespread concern over farmland-driven biodiversity loss in tropical landscapes, the possibly non-linear response of species richness to farmland and the possible dependency of this response on biome remain poorly understood. Drawing on nationwide data about the occurrence of terrestrial bird species at the landscape level in Mozambique, we analysed the effects of farmland extent on species richness, globally threatened, large-range and open-habitat species. In the analysis of species richness, we allowed for non-linear effects and difference in patterns between the rainforest and the wooded savanna–dry forest biomes. According to the intermediate disturbance hypothesis, we found that species diversity peaks at an intermediate level of farmland in wooded savannas and dry forests. However, it monotonically declines with farmland in rainforests, ironically the biome used by Connell to illustrate this hypothesis. This difference across biomes reflects higher resilience of the biota of drier biomes to farmland expansion, possibly related to the role of fire and herbivory in their regulation. Our results confirm that trends in species richness do hide the decline of threatened species and the increase in widespread generalists with farmland extent, contributing to biotic homogenization. Richness alone is thus a poor early-warning indicator of biodiversity loss particularly in wooded savannas and dry forests where species richness initially rises with farmland. Our results emphasize that effective conservation in tropical landscapes requires biome-specific solutions and better indicators of biodiversity loss to guide policies aimed at protecting species richness in rainforests and avoiding biotic homogenization in wooded savannas and dry forests.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8708,"journal":{"name":"Basic and Applied Ecology","volume":"91 ","pages":"Pages 36-48"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basic and Applied Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1439179125001112","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite widespread concern over farmland-driven biodiversity loss in tropical landscapes, the possibly non-linear response of species richness to farmland and the possible dependency of this response on biome remain poorly understood. Drawing on nationwide data about the occurrence of terrestrial bird species at the landscape level in Mozambique, we analysed the effects of farmland extent on species richness, globally threatened, large-range and open-habitat species. In the analysis of species richness, we allowed for non-linear effects and difference in patterns between the rainforest and the wooded savanna–dry forest biomes. According to the intermediate disturbance hypothesis, we found that species diversity peaks at an intermediate level of farmland in wooded savannas and dry forests. However, it monotonically declines with farmland in rainforests, ironically the biome used by Connell to illustrate this hypothesis. This difference across biomes reflects higher resilience of the biota of drier biomes to farmland expansion, possibly related to the role of fire and herbivory in their regulation. Our results confirm that trends in species richness do hide the decline of threatened species and the increase in widespread generalists with farmland extent, contributing to biotic homogenization. Richness alone is thus a poor early-warning indicator of biodiversity loss particularly in wooded savannas and dry forests where species richness initially rises with farmland. Our results emphasize that effective conservation in tropical landscapes requires biome-specific solutions and better indicators of biodiversity loss to guide policies aimed at protecting species richness in rainforests and avoiding biotic homogenization in wooded savannas and dry forests.
鸟类物种丰富度在热带稀树草原和干燥森林的中等水平农田达到峰值,而在热带雨林中没有
尽管人们普遍关注热带景观中由农田驱动的生物多样性丧失,但物种丰富度对农田的可能非线性响应以及这种响应对生物群系的可能依赖性仍然知之甚少。利用莫桑比克全国陆地鸟类景观数据,分析了农田面积对物种丰富度、全球濒危物种、大范围物种和开放栖息地物种的影响。在物种丰富度分析中,我们考虑了热带雨林与稀树草原-干旱林生物群落的非线性效应和模式差异。根据中间扰动假设,我们发现在稀树草原和干旱林中,物种多样性在农田的中间水平上达到峰值。然而,它单调地随着热带雨林农田的减少而减少,讽刺的是康奈尔用来说明这一假设的生物群系。不同生物群落间的这种差异反映了干旱生物群落对农田扩张具有更高的适应能力,这可能与火和草食在其调节中的作用有关。我们的研究结果证实,物种丰富度的趋势确实掩盖了受威胁物种的减少和广泛的通才物种随着农田面积的增加而增加,从而促进了生物同质化。因此,物种丰富度本身并不能作为生物多样性丧失的早期预警指标,特别是在树木繁茂的热带稀树草原和干旱森林,在这些地区,物种丰富度最初随着农田的增加而增加。我们的研究结果强调,有效的热带景观保护需要针对生物群系的解决方案和更好的生物多样性丧失指标,以指导旨在保护热带雨林物种丰富度和避免热带稀树草原和干燥森林生物同质化的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Basic and Applied Ecology
Basic and Applied Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
103
审稿时长
10.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Basic and Applied Ecology provides a forum in which significant advances and ideas can be rapidly communicated to a wide audience. Basic and Applied Ecology publishes original contributions, perspectives and reviews from all areas of basic and applied ecology. Ecologists from all countries are invited to publish ecological research of international interest in its pages. There is no bias with regard to taxon or geographical area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书