Microbial preservation performance evaluation in residential refrigerators: A multiple product, refrigerator placement and temperature setting case study

IF 6.8 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Enrique Martinez-Martinez, Jorge Welti-Chanes, J. Antonio Torres
{"title":"Microbial preservation performance evaluation in residential refrigerators: A multiple product, refrigerator placement and temperature setting case study","authors":"Enrique Martinez-Martinez,&nbsp;Jorge Welti-Chanes,&nbsp;J. Antonio Torres","doi":"10.1016/j.ifset.2026.104456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The microbial preservation performance of a residential refrigerator was evaluated using a Refrigeration Preservation Indicator (RPI) based on the square root model, a frequently used secondary predictive microbiology model, and time-temperature data collected for whole milk, panela cheese and chicken breast meat. RPI values &lt;1, ∼1, and &gt; 1 indicating excellent, acceptable, and poor preservation performance, respectively, were used to assess effects of product placement (door/body shelves, and drawer independently controlled at 0 °C), setting (2/4/5 °C), ambient temperature (21.1 °C [LT] and 32.2 °C[HT]), and load (24.9 kg regular [RL] and 39 kg high load [HL]). Lowering the temperature setting significantly improved RPI values for all product/placement locations. While poor performance was observed at 5 °C with RPI values reaching 3.74 for milk and 1.38 for cheese, for the 2 °C setting, the corresponding values were 1.56 and 1.00. Chicken breast stored in the closed drawer with independent temperature control consistently achieved excellent performance with values ranging 0.42–1.16 across treatments. Under HL conditions, the temperature increase caused by door openings was buffered, but temperature recovery exceeded 30 h. Lowering the temperature setting to 2 °C reduced it to 9.4 h. Product exposure to ambient temperature emulating consumer product use increased RPI variability, as illustrated by one-sided 95% confidence intervals. Finally, refrigerator design improvements were identified to mitigate the lowering of food preservation performance of residential refrigerators caused by door openings and high ambient temperatures. Finally, RPI values can be used to assess the preservation performance of any cold chain component.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":329,"journal":{"name":"Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies","volume":"109 ","pages":"Article 104456"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S146685642600024X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The microbial preservation performance of a residential refrigerator was evaluated using a Refrigeration Preservation Indicator (RPI) based on the square root model, a frequently used secondary predictive microbiology model, and time-temperature data collected for whole milk, panela cheese and chicken breast meat. RPI values <1, ∼1, and > 1 indicating excellent, acceptable, and poor preservation performance, respectively, were used to assess effects of product placement (door/body shelves, and drawer independently controlled at 0 °C), setting (2/4/5 °C), ambient temperature (21.1 °C [LT] and 32.2 °C[HT]), and load (24.9 kg regular [RL] and 39 kg high load [HL]). Lowering the temperature setting significantly improved RPI values for all product/placement locations. While poor performance was observed at 5 °C with RPI values reaching 3.74 for milk and 1.38 for cheese, for the 2 °C setting, the corresponding values were 1.56 and 1.00. Chicken breast stored in the closed drawer with independent temperature control consistently achieved excellent performance with values ranging 0.42–1.16 across treatments. Under HL conditions, the temperature increase caused by door openings was buffered, but temperature recovery exceeded 30 h. Lowering the temperature setting to 2 °C reduced it to 9.4 h. Product exposure to ambient temperature emulating consumer product use increased RPI variability, as illustrated by one-sided 95% confidence intervals. Finally, refrigerator design improvements were identified to mitigate the lowering of food preservation performance of residential refrigerators caused by door openings and high ambient temperatures. Finally, RPI values can be used to assess the preservation performance of any cold chain component.
微生物保存性能评价在家用冰箱:一个多产品,冰箱放置和温度设置的案例研究
采用基于平方根模型(常用的二级预测微生物学模型)的制冷保存指标(RPI)和收集的全脂牛奶、panela奶酪和鸡胸肉的时间-温度数据,对家用冰箱的微生物保存性能进行了评估。RPI值<;1、~ 1和>; 1分别表示优异、可接受和较差的保存性能,用于评估产品放置(门/体货架和抽屉在0°C下独立控制)、设置(2/4/5°C)、环境温度(21.1°C[LT]和32.2°C[HT])和负载(24.9 kg常规[RL]和39 kg高负载[HL])的效果。降低温度设置显著提高了所有产品/放置位置的RPI值。在5°C条件下,牛奶的RPI值为3.74,奶酪的RPI值为1.38,而在2°C条件下,相应的值为1.56和1.00。独立控温的封闭抽屉中保存的鸡胸肉在处理过程中始终保持着良好的性能,其值在0.42-1.16之间。在高温条件下,开门引起的温度升高得到缓冲,但温度恢复超过30小时。将温度设置降低到2°C将其减少到9.4小时。产品暴露于模拟消费产品使用的环境温度下,RPI变化率增加,如单侧95%置信区间所示。最后,确定了冰箱设计的改进,以减轻由于开门和高环境温度导致的住宅冰箱食品保鲜性能的降低。最后,RPI值可以用来评估任何冷链组件的保存性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
6.10%
发文量
259
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies (IFSET) aims to provide the highest quality original contributions and few, mainly upon invitation, reviews on and highly innovative developments in food science and emerging food process technologies. The significance of the results either for the science community or for industrial R&D groups must be specified. Papers submitted must be of highest scientific quality and only those advancing current scientific knowledge and understanding or with technical relevance will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书