Physiological Responses to Four Different Baseline Accelerations on a Human Centrifuge.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 BIOPHYSICS
Joseph K Britton, Nicholas D C Green, Stephen D R Harridge, Adam G Peters, Charlotte G Thornton-White, Ross D Pollock
{"title":"Physiological Responses to Four Different Baseline Accelerations on a Human Centrifuge.","authors":"Joseph K Britton, Nicholas D C Green, Stephen D R Harridge, Adam G Peters, Charlotte G Thornton-White, Ross D Pollock","doi":"10.3357/AMHP.6523.2026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Human centrifuges use baseline acceleration levels between high-G exposures to optimize mechanical performance and minimize motion sickness. This trial assessed the cardiovascular changes associated with different centrifuge baselines to assess their impact on trials and training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 10 subjects (1 female, median age: 35, age range: 27 yr) underwent 2-min exposures to +1.2, +1.4, +1.6, and +1.8 Gz on a human centrifuge, with 5 min at +1 Gz between runs. Cardiovascular variables were assessed via the volume-clamp method and 3-lead electrocardiogram. Blood volume change in the abdomen, thigh, knee, and calf were measured via impedance plethysmography.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was an interaction between all +Gz baseline levels and cardiac output, stroke volume, heart rate, and total peripheral resistance. There was an interaction with mean arterial and diastolic blood pressure at both heart and head level, and with systolic blood pressure at head level only. When compared to +1 Gz, the highest baseline tested of +1.8 Gz resulted in increases in heart-level diastolic pressure (14 ± 8%), total peripheral resistance (31 ± 19%), and heart rate (12 ± 8%), with decreases in cardiac output (-17 ± 9%), stroke volume (-27 ± 4%), and head-level mean arterial pressure (41 ± 9%). Decreases in impedance were greater in the abdomen and thigh at higher +Gz baselines.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The measured response when transitioning from +1 Gz to +1.6 and +1.8 Gz was similar to that previously reported on transition from supine to standing. This response should be considered when selecting baselines, particularly for cardiovascular research. Britton JK, Green NDC, Harridge SDR, Peters AG, Thornton-White CG, Pollock RD. Physiological responses to four different baseline accelerations on a human centrifuge. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2026; 97(2):75-83.</p>","PeriodicalId":7463,"journal":{"name":"Aerospace medicine and human performance","volume":"97 2","pages":"75-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aerospace medicine and human performance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3357/AMHP.6523.2026","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Human centrifuges use baseline acceleration levels between high-G exposures to optimize mechanical performance and minimize motion sickness. This trial assessed the cardiovascular changes associated with different centrifuge baselines to assess their impact on trials and training.

Methods: A total of 10 subjects (1 female, median age: 35, age range: 27 yr) underwent 2-min exposures to +1.2, +1.4, +1.6, and +1.8 Gz on a human centrifuge, with 5 min at +1 Gz between runs. Cardiovascular variables were assessed via the volume-clamp method and 3-lead electrocardiogram. Blood volume change in the abdomen, thigh, knee, and calf were measured via impedance plethysmography.

Results: There was an interaction between all +Gz baseline levels and cardiac output, stroke volume, heart rate, and total peripheral resistance. There was an interaction with mean arterial and diastolic blood pressure at both heart and head level, and with systolic blood pressure at head level only. When compared to +1 Gz, the highest baseline tested of +1.8 Gz resulted in increases in heart-level diastolic pressure (14 ± 8%), total peripheral resistance (31 ± 19%), and heart rate (12 ± 8%), with decreases in cardiac output (-17 ± 9%), stroke volume (-27 ± 4%), and head-level mean arterial pressure (41 ± 9%). Decreases in impedance were greater in the abdomen and thigh at higher +Gz baselines.

Discussion: The measured response when transitioning from +1 Gz to +1.6 and +1.8 Gz was similar to that previously reported on transition from supine to standing. This response should be considered when selecting baselines, particularly for cardiovascular research. Britton JK, Green NDC, Harridge SDR, Peters AG, Thornton-White CG, Pollock RD. Physiological responses to four different baseline accelerations on a human centrifuge. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2026; 97(2):75-83.

人体离心机对四种不同基线加速度的生理反应。
人体离心机使用高g暴露之间的基线加速度水平来优化机械性能并最大限度地减少晕动病。本试验评估了与不同离心机基线相关的心血管变化,以评估其对试验和训练的影响。方法:共有10名受试者(1名女性,年龄中位数:35岁,年龄范围:27岁)在人用离心机上暴露于+1.2,+1.4,+1.6和+1.8 Gz下2分钟,在+1 Gz下5分钟。通过容积钳法和三导联心电图评估心血管变量。通过阻抗容积描记术测量腹部、大腿、膝盖和小腿的血容量变化。结果:所有+Gz基线水平与心输出量、卒中量、心率和总外周阻力之间存在相互作用。与心脏和头部水平的平均动脉和舒张压存在相互作用,仅与头部水平的收缩压存在相互作用。与+1 Gz相比,+1.8 Gz测试的最高基线导致心脏水平舒张压(14±8%),总外周阻力(31±19%)和心率(12±8%)增加,心输出量(-17±9%),卒中容量(-27±4%)和头部平均动脉压(41±9%)减少。在较高的+Gz基线上,腹部和大腿的阻抗下降更大。讨论:从+1 Gz过渡到+1.6和+1.8 Gz时的测量反应与先前报道的从仰卧到站立的过渡相似。在选择基线时应考虑到这种反应,特别是在心血管研究中。Britton JK, Green NDC, Harridge SDR, Peters AG, Thornton-White CG, Pollock RD。人体离心机对四种不同基线加速度的生理反应。航空航天Med Hum执行。2026;97(2): 75 - 83。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Aerospace medicine and human performance
Aerospace medicine and human performance PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
22.20%
发文量
272
期刊介绍: The peer-reviewed monthly journal, Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance (AMHP), formerly Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, provides contact with physicians, life scientists, bioengineers, and medical specialists working in both basic medical research and in its clinical applications. It is the most used and cited journal in its field. It is distributed to more than 80 nations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书