Bioethics in assisted reproduction and embryology.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 ANDROLOGY
George Anifandis, Helen G Tempest, Dimitrios Ioannou, Peter Sutovsky, Christina Messini, Katerina Chatzimeletiou, Eleni Zagelidou, Georgia Kokkali
{"title":"Bioethics in assisted reproduction and embryology.","authors":"George Anifandis, Helen G Tempest, Dimitrios Ioannou, Peter Sutovsky, Christina Messini, Katerina Chatzimeletiou, Eleni Zagelidou, Georgia Kokkali","doi":"10.1080/19396368.2026.2618252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of assisted reproductive therapies, advances in embryo research, and developments in scientific fields such as gene editing and <i>in vitro</i> gametogenesis have attracted the attention of bioethicists for years. On one side, the 14-day rule has faced criticism from embryo researchers advocating for its extension. On the other side, the increasing number of cryopreserved embryos worldwide has raised practical and ethical concerns about their fate. While advancements in scientific research, especially gene editing and in-vitro gametogenesis (IVG), are not yet fully applicable, their potential future use appears to pose significant bioethical questions. In this review, we examine the evolving bioethics of embryo research, focusing on the 14-day rule, the challenges surrounding surplus cryopreserved embryos, and the future dilemmas posed by CRISPR-based gene editing, IVG, and preimplantation genetic testing for polygenic risk (PGT-P). We also highlight the critical role of multidisciplinary, patient-centered counseling in ART practice, to foster informed consent, realistic expectations, and psychosocial well-being. Finally, we underscore the need for anticipatory ethical frameworks and open-society engagement that integrate public deliberation with scientific progress to ensure that reproductive innovation proceeds responsibly, preserving both human dignity and social justice.</p>","PeriodicalId":22184,"journal":{"name":"Systems Biology in Reproductive Medicine","volume":"72 1","pages":"87-100"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systems Biology in Reproductive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19396368.2026.2618252","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANDROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of assisted reproductive therapies, advances in embryo research, and developments in scientific fields such as gene editing and in vitro gametogenesis have attracted the attention of bioethicists for years. On one side, the 14-day rule has faced criticism from embryo researchers advocating for its extension. On the other side, the increasing number of cryopreserved embryos worldwide has raised practical and ethical concerns about their fate. While advancements in scientific research, especially gene editing and in-vitro gametogenesis (IVG), are not yet fully applicable, their potential future use appears to pose significant bioethical questions. In this review, we examine the evolving bioethics of embryo research, focusing on the 14-day rule, the challenges surrounding surplus cryopreserved embryos, and the future dilemmas posed by CRISPR-based gene editing, IVG, and preimplantation genetic testing for polygenic risk (PGT-P). We also highlight the critical role of multidisciplinary, patient-centered counseling in ART practice, to foster informed consent, realistic expectations, and psychosocial well-being. Finally, we underscore the need for anticipatory ethical frameworks and open-society engagement that integrate public deliberation with scientific progress to ensure that reproductive innovation proceeds responsibly, preserving both human dignity and social justice.

辅助生殖和胚胎学中的生命伦理学。
多年来,辅助生殖疗法的使用、胚胎研究的进展以及基因编辑和体外配子发生等科学领域的发展吸引了生物伦理学家的关注。一方面,14天的规定遭到了主张延长该规定的胚胎研究人员的批评。另一方面,世界范围内越来越多的冷冻胚胎引发了对其命运的实际和伦理担忧。虽然科学研究的进步,特别是基因编辑和体外配子发生(IVG),尚未完全适用,但它们未来的潜在用途似乎带来了重大的生物伦理问题。在这篇综述中,我们研究了胚胎研究中不断发展的生物伦理学,重点关注14天规则、围绕剩余冷冻保存胚胎的挑战,以及基于crispr的基因编辑、IVG和植入前多基因风险基因检测(PGT-P)带来的未来困境。我们还强调多学科、以患者为中心的咨询在抗逆转录病毒治疗实践中的关键作用,以促进知情同意、现实期望和社会心理健康。最后,我们强调需要前瞻性的伦理框架和开放社会参与,将公众审议与科学进步结合起来,以确保生殖创新负责任地进行,维护人类尊严和社会正义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.20%
发文量
27
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Systems Biology in Reproductive Medicine, SBiRM, publishes Research Articles, Communications, Applications Notes that include protocols a Clinical Corner that includes case reports, Review Articles and Hypotheses and Letters to the Editor on human and animal reproduction. The journal will highlight the use of systems approaches including genomic, cellular, proteomic, metabolomic, bioinformatic, molecular, and biochemical, to address fundamental questions in reproductive biology, reproductive medicine, and translational research. The journal publishes research involving human and animal gametes, stem cells, developmental biology and toxicology, and clinical care in reproductive medicine. Specific areas of interest to the journal include: male factor infertility and germ cell biology, reproductive technologies (gamete micro-manipulation and cryopreservation, in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer (IVF/ET) and contraception. Research that is directed towards developing new or enhanced technologies for clinical medicine or scientific research in reproduction is of significant interest to the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书