Efficacy and safety of indwelling double-pigtail stents after endoscopic necrosectomy in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis complicated with disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome: A follow-up study.

IF 4.7 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Endoscopic Ultrasound Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-03 DOI:10.1097/eus.0000000000000141
Zhengang Zhou, Qian Liao, Jingwen Rao, Tianming Lai, Mei Yang, Haonan Liu, Kunpeng Yang, Jie Wu, Yong Zhu, Liang Xia, Yupeng Lei, Xin Huang, Jianhua Wan, Huifang Xiong, Lingyu Luo, Zhijian Liu, Xu Shu, Nonghua Lu, Yin Zhu, Wenhua He
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of indwelling double-pigtail stents after endoscopic necrosectomy in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis complicated with disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome: A follow-up study.","authors":"Zhengang Zhou, Qian Liao, Jingwen Rao, Tianming Lai, Mei Yang, Haonan Liu, Kunpeng Yang, Jie Wu, Yong Zhu, Liang Xia, Yupeng Lei, Xin Huang, Jianhua Wan, Huifang Xiong, Lingyu Luo, Zhijian Liu, Xu Shu, Nonghua Lu, Yin Zhu, Wenhua He","doi":"10.1097/eus.0000000000000141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome (DPDS) is a significant cause of pancreatic fluid collection (PFC) recurrence in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis (NP). Effective management strategies for DPDS are crucial to improve patient outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of indwelling double-pigtail stents (DPSs) after endoscopic necrosectomy (EN) in patients with NP complicated with DPDS, focusing on the impact on PFC recurrence rates and readmission.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a 1-year follow-up of patients with NP complicated with DPDS who underwent drainage or/and EN from June 2015 to November 2022. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to whether with DPS after removal of the metal stent. Additionally, a subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of stent type (7Fr and 10Fr DPS) after EN. The primary outcome was to assess the 1-year PFC recurrence rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-eight patients with DPDS were included in the study. Recurrence was seen in 7/30 (23.3%) patients with DPS replacement and 34/48 (70.83%) without DPS replacement within 1 year of discharge; the difference was statistically significant. Additionally, the readmission rate significantly decreased in the group with DPS (10.00% <i>vs.</i> 31.25%, <i>P</i> = 0.03). Subgroup analysis indicated that 7Fr DPSs were associated with lower PFC recurrence and adverse event rates compared to 10Fr DPSs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with NP complicated with DPDS, the replacement and long-term indwelling of DPS can reduce the recurrence rate and hospital readmission rate. Furthermore, the 7Fr DPS size may offer better outcomes in terms of recurrence and safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":11577,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopic Ultrasound","volume":"14 5","pages":"249-255"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12829628/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopic Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/eus.0000000000000141","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome (DPDS) is a significant cause of pancreatic fluid collection (PFC) recurrence in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis (NP). Effective management strategies for DPDS are crucial to improve patient outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of indwelling double-pigtail stents (DPSs) after endoscopic necrosectomy (EN) in patients with NP complicated with DPDS, focusing on the impact on PFC recurrence rates and readmission.

Methods: We conducted a 1-year follow-up of patients with NP complicated with DPDS who underwent drainage or/and EN from June 2015 to November 2022. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to whether with DPS after removal of the metal stent. Additionally, a subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of stent type (7Fr and 10Fr DPS) after EN. The primary outcome was to assess the 1-year PFC recurrence rate.

Results: Seventy-eight patients with DPDS were included in the study. Recurrence was seen in 7/30 (23.3%) patients with DPS replacement and 34/48 (70.83%) without DPS replacement within 1 year of discharge; the difference was statistically significant. Additionally, the readmission rate significantly decreased in the group with DPS (10.00% vs. 31.25%, P = 0.03). Subgroup analysis indicated that 7Fr DPSs were associated with lower PFC recurrence and adverse event rates compared to 10Fr DPSs.

Conclusion: In patients with NP complicated with DPDS, the replacement and long-term indwelling of DPS can reduce the recurrence rate and hospital readmission rate. Furthermore, the 7Fr DPS size may offer better outcomes in terms of recurrence and safety.

Abstract Image

内镜下坏死性胰腺炎合并胰管断开综合征患者行坏死性切除术后留置双尾纤支架的疗效和安全性:一项随访研究。
背景和目的:胰管断开综合征(DPDS)是坏死性胰腺炎(NP)患者胰液收集(PFC)复发的重要原因。有效的DPDS管理策略对改善患者预后至关重要。本研究旨在评价内镜下坏死切除术(EN)后留置双尾支架(DPSs)对NP合并DPDS患者的疗效和安全性,重点关注其对PFC复发率和再入院率的影响。方法:我们对2015年6月至2022年11月接受引流或/和EN治疗的NP合并DPDS患者进行了1年的随访。根据取出金属支架后是否存在DPS将患者分为两组。此外,进行亚组分析以评估EN后支架类型(7Fr和10Fr DPS)的影响。主要结局是评估1年PFC复发率。结果:78例DPDS患者纳入研究。接受DPS置换的患者有7/30(23.3%)复发,未接受DPS置换的患者有34/48(70.83%)复发;差异有统计学意义。此外,DPS组的再入院率显著降低(10.00% vs. 31.25%, P = 0.03)。亚组分析显示,与10Fr dps相比,7Fr dps与更低的PFC复发率和不良事件发生率相关。结论:NP合并DPDS患者更换并长期留置DPS可降低复发率和再入院率。此外,7Fr DPS大小可能在复发和安全性方面提供更好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Endoscopic Ultrasound
Endoscopic Ultrasound GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
144
期刊介绍: Endoscopic Ultrasound, a publication of Euro-EUS Scientific Committee, Asia-Pacific EUS Task Force and Latin American Chapter of EUS, is a peer-reviewed online journal with Quarterly print on demand compilation of issues published. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.eusjournal.com. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository. The journal does not charge for submission, processing or publication of manuscripts and even for color reproduction of photographs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书