A systematic review of the use of corticosteroid injections with and without local anaesthetic for trigger finger.

Q4 Medicine
G J Hourston, K R Quinn, J Chan, A Mckee
{"title":"A systematic review of the use of corticosteroid injections with and without local anaesthetic for trigger finger.","authors":"G J Hourston, K R Quinn, J Chan, A Mckee","doi":"10.48095/ccachp2025203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trigger finger causes pain, catching, and locking of the finger, with corticosteroid injection being the first-line treatment. Injections with local anaesthetic may reduce immediate pain, but it has been suggested that added volume worsens pain. This systematic review aimed to evaluate studies investigating pain following corticosteroid injection for trigger finger, with or without local anaesthetic. Evaluation of the topic: We performed a prospectively registered systematic review (PROSPERO ID: CRD42024502361) following PRISMA guidelines. We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase database for randomised trials or prospective cohort studies investigating pain following injection with corticosteroid with or without local anaesthetic. Patient demographic data, injection details and outcomes including visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores were collected and summarised. Two articles including 98 patients (135 injections) were included. One article compared steroid injection with local anaesthetic and adrenaline to steroid injection with placebo (0.9% saline), and found that omitting local anaesthetic had a lower immediate VAS pain score (2.0 vs. 3.5; P &lt; 0.01) however all injections contained the same volume. The second study measured VAS pain scores at multiple time points, and a recollection score for patients injected with either corticosteroid alone (1mL), corticosteroid and 1% xylocaine (2 mL), or corticosteroid and 0.9% saline (2 mL). VAS pain scores were similar in the steroid alone and steroid and local anaesthetic group at 1 minute post-injection and highest in the steroid and saline group. The local anaesthetic group had the lowest pain score 10 minutes post-injection. Meta-analysis of outcomes in these heterogeneously reported studies was not possible.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Corticosteroid injection for trigger finger varies considerably and outcomes are reported inconsistently. The evidence suggests that the addition of local anaesthetic may increase immediate pain due to volume effect or lowered pH but reduce early post-injection pain. Further well-designed randomised studies are needed to guide treatment decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":7098,"journal":{"name":"Acta chirurgiae plasticae","volume":"67 3","pages":"203-209"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta chirurgiae plasticae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48095/ccachp2025203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Trigger finger causes pain, catching, and locking of the finger, with corticosteroid injection being the first-line treatment. Injections with local anaesthetic may reduce immediate pain, but it has been suggested that added volume worsens pain. This systematic review aimed to evaluate studies investigating pain following corticosteroid injection for trigger finger, with or without local anaesthetic. Evaluation of the topic: We performed a prospectively registered systematic review (PROSPERO ID: CRD42024502361) following PRISMA guidelines. We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase database for randomised trials or prospective cohort studies investigating pain following injection with corticosteroid with or without local anaesthetic. Patient demographic data, injection details and outcomes including visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores were collected and summarised. Two articles including 98 patients (135 injections) were included. One article compared steroid injection with local anaesthetic and adrenaline to steroid injection with placebo (0.9% saline), and found that omitting local anaesthetic had a lower immediate VAS pain score (2.0 vs. 3.5; P < 0.01) however all injections contained the same volume. The second study measured VAS pain scores at multiple time points, and a recollection score for patients injected with either corticosteroid alone (1mL), corticosteroid and 1% xylocaine (2 mL), or corticosteroid and 0.9% saline (2 mL). VAS pain scores were similar in the steroid alone and steroid and local anaesthetic group at 1 minute post-injection and highest in the steroid and saline group. The local anaesthetic group had the lowest pain score 10 minutes post-injection. Meta-analysis of outcomes in these heterogeneously reported studies was not possible.

Conclusion: Corticosteroid injection for trigger finger varies considerably and outcomes are reported inconsistently. The evidence suggests that the addition of local anaesthetic may increase immediate pain due to volume effect or lowered pH but reduce early post-injection pain. Further well-designed randomised studies are needed to guide treatment decisions.

使用皮质类固醇注射与不局部麻醉扳机指的系统回顾。
背景:扳机指引起疼痛、抓握和手指锁定,皮质类固醇注射是一线治疗方法。局部麻醉注射可能会减轻即时疼痛,但有人认为,增加剂量会加重疼痛。本系统综述旨在评价针对扳机指注射皮质类固醇后疼痛的研究,有或没有局部麻醉。主题评价:我们按照PRISMA指南进行了前瞻性注册系统评价(PROSPERO ID: CRD42024502361)。我们检索了PubMed、Cochrane图书馆和Embase数据库,寻找随机试验或前瞻性队列研究,以调查注射皮质类固醇伴或不伴局部麻醉后的疼痛。收集并总结患者人口统计数据、注射细节和结果,包括视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分。纳入两篇文章,共98例患者(135次注射)。一篇文章比较了局部麻醉和肾上腺素的类固醇注射与安慰剂(0.9%生理盐水)的类固醇注射,发现不局部麻醉的即时VAS疼痛评分较低(2.0比3.5;P < 0.01),但所有注射的体积相同。第二项研究测量了多个时间点的VAS疼痛评分,以及单独注射皮质类固醇(1mL)、皮质类固醇和1%木卡因(2ml)或皮质类固醇和0.9%生理盐水(2ml)的患者的回忆评分。注射后1分钟,单独使用类固醇组和类固醇加局麻组的VAS疼痛评分相似,类固醇加生理盐水组疼痛评分最高。局部麻醉组在注射后10分钟疼痛评分最低。不可能对这些异质性报告的研究结果进行荟萃分析。结论:皮质类固醇注射治疗扳机指差异很大,结果报告不一致。有证据表明,局部麻醉剂的加入可能会由于体积效应或降低pH值而增加即时疼痛,但会减轻早期注射后疼痛。需要进一步精心设计的随机研究来指导治疗决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta chirurgiae plasticae
Acta chirurgiae plasticae Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书