Improving childhood vaccination among minority populations in middle- and high-income countries: a realist review of health system interventions.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Jumanah Essa-Hadad, Yanay Gorelik, Johanna Vervoort, Danielle Jansen, Michael Edelstein
{"title":"Improving childhood vaccination among minority populations in middle- and high-income countries: a realist review of health system interventions.","authors":"Jumanah Essa-Hadad, Yanay Gorelik, Johanna Vervoort, Danielle Jansen, Michael Edelstein","doi":"10.1136/jech-2025-225099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most minority populations in Europe generally exhibit lower childhood vaccine uptake compared with the general population. Improving uptake in these populations requires contextually tailored interventions. We conducted a realist review to identify interventions effective at improving measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) and human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine uptake among underserved communities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane and ProQuest for English language publications from 2005 to 2022. Following title and abstract screening, full texts were assessed for relevance. Grey literature and reference lists were also examined. Data extraction and analysis were performed independently by two reviewers. Programme theories were generated from included articles and data extraction focusing on context-mechanism-outcome configurations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1942 screened titles, 87 studies underwent full-text review of which 34 met inclusion criteria. 10 primary intervention categories were identified: parental and youth education; clinical outreach; data infrastructure/quality improvement; health provider training; school-based education; digital technology for patients; cash incentives; home visits; comic books; community leaders' education; and consent policy changes. Analysis highlighting contextual factors enabling or hindering each intervention category's success was conducted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multicomponent strategies proved the most effective, with strongest evidence supporting home visits, parental and youth education, school-based programmes, data infrastructure and quality improvement and healthcare provider training. Moderate evidence supported reminders/recall strategies, comic books and consent policy changes, while digital technology for patients and cash incentives showed limited effectiveness. Importantly, there is no one-size-fits-all solution. Policymakers and practitioners should tailor and adapt interventions to the unique cultural, social and economic contexts of each group to ensure success.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42021268068.</p>","PeriodicalId":54839,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health","volume":" ","pages":"379-387"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2025-225099","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Most minority populations in Europe generally exhibit lower childhood vaccine uptake compared with the general population. Improving uptake in these populations requires contextually tailored interventions. We conducted a realist review to identify interventions effective at improving measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) and human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine uptake among underserved communities.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane and ProQuest for English language publications from 2005 to 2022. Following title and abstract screening, full texts were assessed for relevance. Grey literature and reference lists were also examined. Data extraction and analysis were performed independently by two reviewers. Programme theories were generated from included articles and data extraction focusing on context-mechanism-outcome configurations.

Results: Of 1942 screened titles, 87 studies underwent full-text review of which 34 met inclusion criteria. 10 primary intervention categories were identified: parental and youth education; clinical outreach; data infrastructure/quality improvement; health provider training; school-based education; digital technology for patients; cash incentives; home visits; comic books; community leaders' education; and consent policy changes. Analysis highlighting contextual factors enabling or hindering each intervention category's success was conducted.

Conclusions: Multicomponent strategies proved the most effective, with strongest evidence supporting home visits, parental and youth education, school-based programmes, data infrastructure and quality improvement and healthcare provider training. Moderate evidence supported reminders/recall strategies, comic books and consent policy changes, while digital technology for patients and cash incentives showed limited effectiveness. Importantly, there is no one-size-fits-all solution. Policymakers and practitioners should tailor and adapt interventions to the unique cultural, social and economic contexts of each group to ensure success.

Prospero registration number: CRD42021268068.

改善中等收入和高收入国家少数民族人群的儿童疫苗接种:对卫生系统干预措施的现实审查。
背景:与一般人群相比,欧洲大多数少数民族人群普遍表现出较低的儿童疫苗接种率。改善这些人群的吸收需要因地制宜的干预措施。我们进行了一项现实主义回顾,以确定在服务不足的社区中有效改善麻疹、腮腺炎和风疹(MMR)和人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗接种的干预措施。方法:检索MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、Cochrane和ProQuest,检索2005 - 2022年的英文出版物。在标题和摘要筛选之后,评估全文的相关性。灰色文献和参考文献列表也被检查。数据提取和分析由两名审稿人独立完成。程序理论是从纳入的文章和数据提取中产生的,重点是上下文-机制-结果配置。结果:在1942个筛选标题中,87个研究进行了全文审查,其中34个符合纳入标准。确定了10个主要干预类别:父母和青少年教育;临床推广;数据基础设施/质量改进;保健提供者培训;学校教育;患者的数字技术;现金奖励;家访;漫画书;社区领袖教育;同意政策也改变了。分析强调了促成或阻碍每个干预类别成功的背景因素。结论:多成分战略被证明是最有效的,有最有力的证据支持家访、家长和青年教育、校本方案、数据基础设施和质量改进以及医疗保健提供者培训。适度的证据支持提醒/召回策略、漫画书和同意政策的改变,而针对患者的数字技术和现金激励的效果有限。重要的是,没有放之四海而皆准的解决方案。决策者和实践者应该根据每个群体独特的文化、社会和经济背景量身定制和调整干预措施,以确保成功。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42021268068。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health is a leading international journal devoted to publication of original research and reviews covering applied, methodological and theoretical issues with emphasis on studies using multidisciplinary or integrative approaches. The journal aims to improve epidemiological knowledge and ultimately health worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书