Comparative study on sand erosion damage and residual strength of GFRP, BFRP, and CFRP composites

IF 6.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Wenhao Ren, Siha A
{"title":"Comparative study on sand erosion damage and residual strength of GFRP, BFRP, and CFRP composites","authors":"Wenhao Ren,&nbsp;Siha A","doi":"10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2026.105659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Wind and sand erosion is a key environmental factor affecting the service life of fiber-reinforced composite materials, but the mechanical degradation mechanisms of different types of composite structures under multi-parameter erosion remain unclear. This study utilized a jet erosion test platform to systematically evaluate the performance evolution of three typical structures—GFRP, BFRP, and CFRP—under varying erosion angles (15°–90°), velocities (16–31 m/s), and durations (10–50 min). The results show that all three undergo damage processes such as resin delamination, fiber exposure, and interlaminar debonding, with 60° being the most prone angle for failure. CFRP exhibits the highest strength retention rate (82%), but the most significant modulus decrease (14.9%); GFRP experiences over a 30% strength reduction under prolonged erosion, while BFRP exhibits strain separation and early instability. Stress-strain and multi-point strain analyses indicate that CFRP maintains deformation consistency after erosion; GFRP exhibits more ductile behavior accompanied by progressive strain bifurcation; while BFRP demonstrates moderate mechanical response with limited strain compatibility. The semi-empirical predictive model constructed further achieved good fitting on all three materials (R² &gt; 0.84), validating its cross-material applicability. The research results provide a theoretical basis for corrosion-resistant design, surface protection, and life prediction of composite structures under complex operating conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50318,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Impact Engineering","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 105659"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Impact Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0734743X26000266","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wind and sand erosion is a key environmental factor affecting the service life of fiber-reinforced composite materials, but the mechanical degradation mechanisms of different types of composite structures under multi-parameter erosion remain unclear. This study utilized a jet erosion test platform to systematically evaluate the performance evolution of three typical structures—GFRP, BFRP, and CFRP—under varying erosion angles (15°–90°), velocities (16–31 m/s), and durations (10–50 min). The results show that all three undergo damage processes such as resin delamination, fiber exposure, and interlaminar debonding, with 60° being the most prone angle for failure. CFRP exhibits the highest strength retention rate (82%), but the most significant modulus decrease (14.9%); GFRP experiences over a 30% strength reduction under prolonged erosion, while BFRP exhibits strain separation and early instability. Stress-strain and multi-point strain analyses indicate that CFRP maintains deformation consistency after erosion; GFRP exhibits more ductile behavior accompanied by progressive strain bifurcation; while BFRP demonstrates moderate mechanical response with limited strain compatibility. The semi-empirical predictive model constructed further achieved good fitting on all three materials (R² > 0.84), validating its cross-material applicability. The research results provide a theoretical basis for corrosion-resistant design, surface protection, and life prediction of composite structures under complex operating conditions.
GFRP、BFRP、CFRP复合材料的沙蚀损伤及残余强度对比研究
风沙侵蚀是影响纤维增强复合材料使用寿命的关键环境因素,但不同类型复合材料结构在多参数侵蚀作用下的力学退化机制尚不清楚。本研究利用射流侵蚀试验平台,系统评估了gfrp、BFRP和cfrp三种典型结构在不同侵蚀角度(15°-90°)、速度(16-31 m/s)和持续时间(10-50 min)下的性能演变。结果表明,三种材料均经历了树脂分层、纤维暴露和层间脱粘等损伤过程,其中60°角是最容易失效的角度。CFRP的强度保持率最高(82%),但模量降低幅度最大(14.9%);GFRP在长时间侵蚀下强度降低30%以上,而BFRP表现出应变分离和早期不稳定。应力应变和多点应变分析表明,CFRP在侵蚀后保持变形一致性;GFRP表现出更强的延性,并伴有渐进的应变分岔;而BFRP表现出适度的力学响应,应变相容性有限。所构建的半经验预测模型对三种材料均取得了较好的拟合效果(R²> 0.84),验证了其跨材料适用性。研究结果为复合材料结构在复杂工况下的耐腐蚀设计、表面防护和寿命预测提供了理论依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Impact Engineering
International Journal of Impact Engineering 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
13.70%
发文量
241
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Impact Engineering, established in 1983 publishes original research findings related to the response of structures, components and materials subjected to impact, blast and high-rate loading. Areas relevant to the journal encompass the following general topics and those associated with them: -Behaviour and failure of structures and materials under impact and blast loading -Systems for protection and absorption of impact and blast loading -Terminal ballistics -Dynamic behaviour and failure of materials including plasticity and fracture -Stress waves -Structural crashworthiness -High-rate mechanical and forming processes -Impact, blast and high-rate loading/measurement techniques and their applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书