Addressing language barriers in maternity emergency care in the UK: A mixed methods quality improvement simulation study

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Clinical Simulation in Nursing Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-23 DOI:10.1016/j.ecns.2025.101900
Sorcha Magee , David B. Olawade
{"title":"Addressing language barriers in maternity emergency care in the UK: A mixed methods quality improvement simulation study","authors":"Sorcha Magee ,&nbsp;David B. Olawade","doi":"10.1016/j.ecns.2025.101900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Language barriers in maternity care compromise patient safety and quality, with poorer maternal outcomes observed when communication between obstetric staff and women with limited English proficiency is hindered, especially during emergencies.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To explore obstetric and maternity staff understanding of language barriers when caring for women during obstetric emergencies.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A six-week mixed-methods quality improvement study in a UK National Health Service (NHS) Trust maternity unit. Forty maternity and obstetric clinicians were recruited. Participants engaged in postpartum hemorrhage simulations using a simulation mannikin programmed to speak a foreign language. Data collection involved presimulation Likert-scale questionnaires (five items) and postsimulation debriefs. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively; qualitative data underwent thematic analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Presimulation data revealed limited staff confidence: 52% were dissatisfied with interpretation services, 60% were very dissatisfied with communication support, and 57% were neutral about understanding communication in obstetric emergencies. Thematic analysis identified three key themes: (a) unavailability of interpreting services during emergencies, (b) undervaluing the importance of communication in urgent scenarios, and (c) opportunities for enhancing simulation-based communication training.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Significant knowledge gaps and inadequate systems hinder effective communication with women facing language barriers during obstetric emergencies.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Urgent action is needed to strengthen training in interpretation services, enhance communication infrastructure, and raise awareness among maternity teams about the critical role of communication in emergency care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48753,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","volume":"111 ","pages":"Article 101900"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139925002154","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Language barriers in maternity care compromise patient safety and quality, with poorer maternal outcomes observed when communication between obstetric staff and women with limited English proficiency is hindered, especially during emergencies.

Objective

To explore obstetric and maternity staff understanding of language barriers when caring for women during obstetric emergencies.

Methods

A six-week mixed-methods quality improvement study in a UK National Health Service (NHS) Trust maternity unit. Forty maternity and obstetric clinicians were recruited. Participants engaged in postpartum hemorrhage simulations using a simulation mannikin programmed to speak a foreign language. Data collection involved presimulation Likert-scale questionnaires (five items) and postsimulation debriefs. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively; qualitative data underwent thematic analysis.

Findings

Presimulation data revealed limited staff confidence: 52% were dissatisfied with interpretation services, 60% were very dissatisfied with communication support, and 57% were neutral about understanding communication in obstetric emergencies. Thematic analysis identified three key themes: (a) unavailability of interpreting services during emergencies, (b) undervaluing the importance of communication in urgent scenarios, and (c) opportunities for enhancing simulation-based communication training.

Discussion

Significant knowledge gaps and inadequate systems hinder effective communication with women facing language barriers during obstetric emergencies.

Conclusion

Urgent action is needed to strengthen training in interpretation services, enhance communication infrastructure, and raise awareness among maternity teams about the critical role of communication in emergency care.
解决英国产科急诊护理中的语言障碍:一项混合方法质量改进模拟研究
产科护理中的语言障碍会影响患者的安全和质量,当产科工作人员与英语水平有限的妇女之间的沟通受阻时,特别是在紧急情况下,会出现较差的产妇结局。目的探讨产科和产科工作人员在产科急诊期间护理妇女时对语言障碍的理解。方法在英国国家卫生服务(NHS)信托产科单位进行为期六周的混合方法质量改进研究。招募了40名产科和产科临床医生。参与者使用一个会说外语的模拟人体模型进行产后出血模拟。数据收集包括模拟前李克特量表问卷(五项)和模拟后汇报。定量资料进行描述性分析;对定性数据进行专题分析。spresimulation数据显示,工作人员的信心有限:52%的人对口译服务不满意,60%的人对沟通支持非常不满意,57%的人对产科急诊中的沟通理解持中立态度。专题分析确定了三个关键主题:(a)紧急情况下无法提供口译服务;(b)低估紧急情况下沟通的重要性;(c)加强模拟沟通培训的机会。重大的知识差距和不完善的系统阻碍了与产科急诊期间面临语言障碍的妇女进行有效沟通。结论需要采取紧急行动,加强口译服务培训,改善沟通基础设施,提高产科团队对沟通在急诊护理中的关键作用的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Clinical Simulation in Nursing is an international, peer reviewed journal published online monthly. Clinical Simulation in Nursing is the official journal of the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation & Learning (INACSL) and reflects its mission to advance the science of healthcare simulation. We will review and accept articles from other health provider disciplines, if they are determined to be of interest to our readership. The journal accepts manuscripts meeting one or more of the following criteria: Research articles and literature reviews (e.g. systematic, scoping, umbrella, integrative, etc.) about simulation Innovative teaching/learning strategies using simulation Articles updating guidelines, regulations, and legislative policies that impact simulation Leadership for simulation Simulation operations Clinical and academic uses of simulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书