Waste management–related trust, acceptance, and reputation: A multidisciplinary big data analysis across knowledge domains

IF 13.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Kalle Nuortimo , Janne Härkönen , Kristijan Breznik
{"title":"Waste management–related trust, acceptance, and reputation: A multidisciplinary big data analysis across knowledge domains","authors":"Kalle Nuortimo ,&nbsp;Janne Härkönen ,&nbsp;Kristijan Breznik","doi":"10.1016/j.techfore.2026.124553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Addressing global waste management challenges requires understanding not only the technical capabilities of products and technologies but also the factors shaping their development and deployment across the waste hierarchy. Deployment outcomes are strongly influenced by acceptance, reputation, and trust, distinct yet interrelated constructs whose dynamics remain insufficiently understood. Deepening this understanding can enhance stakeholder engagement and improve decision-making in waste management. This study examines waste-to-energy incineration as a representative case to investigate these dynamics across global, regional, and local levels. A multidisciplinary, data-driven approach is applied, combining artificial intelligence, big data analytics, opinion mining, Correspondence Analysis on Generalized Aggregated Lexical Tables, and content classification to assess acceptance, trust, and reputation in multiple knowledge domains. The analysis clarifies these constructs as interwoven but individually influential factors shaping technology deployment and explores their interplay with public perception. A novel method is also introduced for generating indicative reputation scores derived from sentiment analysis. The findings show that AI-enhanced analytical tools, when integrated with established methods, yield valuable insights into stakeholder sentiment and public discourse. These insights can inform more targeted stakeholder engagement and strategic communication in waste management planning. Overall, the study demonstrates the potential of emerging analytical tools to produce timely, structured indicators of trust, acceptance, and reputation, key dimensions for navigating the socio-political challenges of technology deployment in the waste sector.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48454,"journal":{"name":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","volume":"225 ","pages":"Article 124553"},"PeriodicalIF":13.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162526000302","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Addressing global waste management challenges requires understanding not only the technical capabilities of products and technologies but also the factors shaping their development and deployment across the waste hierarchy. Deployment outcomes are strongly influenced by acceptance, reputation, and trust, distinct yet interrelated constructs whose dynamics remain insufficiently understood. Deepening this understanding can enhance stakeholder engagement and improve decision-making in waste management. This study examines waste-to-energy incineration as a representative case to investigate these dynamics across global, regional, and local levels. A multidisciplinary, data-driven approach is applied, combining artificial intelligence, big data analytics, opinion mining, Correspondence Analysis on Generalized Aggregated Lexical Tables, and content classification to assess acceptance, trust, and reputation in multiple knowledge domains. The analysis clarifies these constructs as interwoven but individually influential factors shaping technology deployment and explores their interplay with public perception. A novel method is also introduced for generating indicative reputation scores derived from sentiment analysis. The findings show that AI-enhanced analytical tools, when integrated with established methods, yield valuable insights into stakeholder sentiment and public discourse. These insights can inform more targeted stakeholder engagement and strategic communication in waste management planning. Overall, the study demonstrates the potential of emerging analytical tools to produce timely, structured indicators of trust, acceptance, and reputation, key dimensions for navigating the socio-political challenges of technology deployment in the waste sector.
废物管理相关的信任、接受和声誉:跨知识领域的多学科大数据分析
解决全球废物管理挑战不仅需要了解产品和技术的技术能力,还需要了解影响其发展和在废物层次结构中部署的因素。部署结果受到接受度、声誉和信任的强烈影响,这些不同但相互关联的结构的动态仍然没有得到充分的理解。深化这种理解可以加强利益相关者的参与,改善废物管理方面的决策。本研究以垃圾焚烧发电为代表案例,在全球、区域和地方层面调查这些动态。采用多学科、数据驱动的方法,结合人工智能、大数据分析、意见挖掘、广义聚合词法表对应分析和内容分类,评估多个知识领域的接受度、信任和声誉。分析澄清了这些结构是相互交织的,但单独的影响因素塑造技术部署,并探讨了它们与公众认知的相互作用。还介绍了一种从情感分析中产生指示性声誉分数的新方法。研究结果表明,人工智能增强的分析工具与现有方法相结合,可以对利益相关者的情绪和公共话语产生有价值的见解。这些见解可以为废物管理规划中更有针对性的利益相关者参与和战略沟通提供信息。总体而言,该研究展示了新兴分析工具在产生及时、结构化的信任、接受度和声誉指标方面的潜力,这些指标是应对垃圾行业技术部署所面临的社会政治挑战的关键维度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
10.80%
发文量
813
期刊介绍: Technological Forecasting and Social Change is a prominent platform for individuals engaged in the methodology and application of technological forecasting and future studies as planning tools, exploring the interconnectedness of social, environmental, and technological factors. In addition to serving as a key forum for these discussions, we offer numerous benefits for authors, including complimentary PDFs, a generous copyright policy, exclusive discounts on Elsevier publications, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书