When it rains, it pours: integration of equity in flood risk management in Boulder County, Colorado

IF 5 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Climate Risk Management Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-10 DOI:10.1016/j.crm.2026.100788
Lauren Stevenson, Elizabeth Reddy, Junko Munakata Marr, Marie Stettler Kleine
{"title":"When it rains, it pours: integration of equity in flood risk management in Boulder County, Colorado","authors":"Lauren Stevenson,&nbsp;Elizabeth Reddy,&nbsp;Junko Munakata Marr,&nbsp;Marie Stettler Kleine","doi":"10.1016/j.crm.2026.100788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Flooding disproportionately impacts underserved and marginalized communities. Institutional means of addressing environmental injustice related to such events remain inadequate in the United States of America. Professionals involved in community engagement and risk management contend with these challenges nonetheless, drawing on their personal ideas about equity rather than formal guidance to do so. This study uses qualitative methods to explore how local, county, and region-level government professionals in Boulder County, Colorado, understand and engage with equity in flood risk management. We sort the approaches to equity that study participants described into three categories, responding to their focus on: access needs, traditionally and present-day overlooked groups, and the duty of a government employee to serve the whole community. While other scholars have productively categorized such ideas and practices in relation to <em>theories of equity</em>, we turn instead to notions of efficacious practice through <em>design frameworks</em> developed in disability studies. Doing so, we offer a model for understanding empirical approaches to equity that professionals may use in the absence of other guidance. . Our results show that disability studies can provide powerful insights for research on flood risk management. Further, they demonstrate the importance of critical engagement with how professionals navigate their work in support of equity in the context of substantial institutional failures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54226,"journal":{"name":"Climate Risk Management","volume":"51 ","pages":"Article 100788"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Climate Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221209632600001X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Flooding disproportionately impacts underserved and marginalized communities. Institutional means of addressing environmental injustice related to such events remain inadequate in the United States of America. Professionals involved in community engagement and risk management contend with these challenges nonetheless, drawing on their personal ideas about equity rather than formal guidance to do so. This study uses qualitative methods to explore how local, county, and region-level government professionals in Boulder County, Colorado, understand and engage with equity in flood risk management. We sort the approaches to equity that study participants described into three categories, responding to their focus on: access needs, traditionally and present-day overlooked groups, and the duty of a government employee to serve the whole community. While other scholars have productively categorized such ideas and practices in relation to theories of equity, we turn instead to notions of efficacious practice through design frameworks developed in disability studies. Doing so, we offer a model for understanding empirical approaches to equity that professionals may use in the absence of other guidance. . Our results show that disability studies can provide powerful insights for research on flood risk management. Further, they demonstrate the importance of critical engagement with how professionals navigate their work in support of equity in the context of substantial institutional failures.
祸不双全:科罗拉多州博尔德县洪水风险管理的整合
洪水对服务不足和边缘化社区的影响尤为严重。在美利坚合众国,解决与此类事件有关的环境不公正现象的体制手段仍然不足。尽管如此,参与社区参与和风险管理的专业人士仍在应对这些挑战,他们利用自己对公平的个人想法,而不是正式的指导。本研究使用定性方法探讨科罗拉多州博尔德县的地方、县和区级政府专业人员如何理解和参与洪水风险管理的公平性。我们将研究参与者描述的实现公平的方法分为三类,以回应他们关注的重点:获取需求,传统和现在被忽视的群体,以及政府雇员为整个社区服务的责任。虽然其他学者已经将这些想法和实践与公平理论进行了富有成效的分类,但我们通过残疾研究中开发的设计框架转向有效实践的概念。这样做,我们提供了一个模型来理解实证方法的公平,专业人士可能会在缺乏其他指导的情况下使用。我们的研究结果表明,残疾研究可以为洪水风险管理研究提供强有力的见解。此外,他们还证明了在重大制度失败的背景下,专业人士如何在支持公平的工作中进行批判性参与的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Climate Risk Management
Climate Risk Management Earth and Planetary Sciences-Atmospheric Science
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
76
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: Climate Risk Management publishes original scientific contributions, state-of-the-art reviews and reports of practical experience on the use of knowledge and information regarding the consequences of climate variability and climate change in decision and policy making on climate change responses from the near- to long-term. The concept of climate risk management refers to activities and methods that are used by individuals, organizations, and institutions to facilitate climate-resilient decision-making. Its objective is to promote sustainable development by maximizing the beneficial impacts of climate change responses and minimizing negative impacts across the full spectrum of geographies and sectors that are potentially affected by the changing climate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书