Lecture capture as Universal Design for Learning: a post-pandemic scoping review

IF 1.9 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY
Current Opinion in Physiology Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-02 DOI:10.1016/j.cophys.2025.100896
Emily Nordmann , Jill RD MacKay
{"title":"Lecture capture as Universal Design for Learning: a post-pandemic scoping review","authors":"Emily Nordmann ,&nbsp;Jill RD MacKay","doi":"10.1016/j.cophys.2025.100896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Lecture capture is frequently justified as an inclusive technology, yet its alignment with Universal Design for Learning (UDL) in post-pandemic practice has not been empirically considered. We conducted a scoping review of post-pandemic lecture capture research, identifying 12 studies that considered live lecture recording in higher education. Using the UDL guidelines as an analytic framework, we found that lecture capture primarily supports Engagement and, to a lesser extent, Representation through flexible access, replay and player controls. Action and Expression and higher-level executive functions were rarely addressed. Demographic reporting was limited, with few analyses for disabled, neurodivergent or commuting students. We argue that lecture capture is necessary, but insufficient as a sole adjustment for inclusive design and prioritise future research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52156,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Physiology","volume":"47 ","pages":"Article 100896"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468867325000847","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lecture capture is frequently justified as an inclusive technology, yet its alignment with Universal Design for Learning (UDL) in post-pandemic practice has not been empirically considered. We conducted a scoping review of post-pandemic lecture capture research, identifying 12 studies that considered live lecture recording in higher education. Using the UDL guidelines as an analytic framework, we found that lecture capture primarily supports Engagement and, to a lesser extent, Representation through flexible access, replay and player controls. Action and Expression and higher-level executive functions were rarely addressed. Demographic reporting was limited, with few analyses for disabled, neurodivergent or commuting students. We argue that lecture capture is necessary, but insufficient as a sole adjustment for inclusive design and prioritise future research.
作为通用学习设计的讲座捕捉:大流行后的范围审查
讲座捕捉通常被认为是一种包容性技术,但在大流行后的实践中,它与通用学习设计(UDL)的一致性尚未得到经验考虑。我们对大流行后的讲座记录研究进行了范围审查,确定了12项考虑在高等教育中进行现场讲座记录的研究。使用UDL指南作为分析框架,我们发现讲座捕获主要支持粘性,并通过灵活的访问、重播和玩家控制在较小程度上支持表现。很少涉及行动和表达以及更高层次的执行功能。人口统计报告有限,对残疾、神经分化或通勤学生的分析很少。我们认为,讲座捕捉是必要的,但不足以作为包容性设计的唯一调整和优先考虑未来的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Physiology
Current Opinion in Physiology Medicine-Physiology (medical)
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书