Effects of low and short medial osteotomy on postoperative neurosensory disturbances after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a split-mouth randomized study
{"title":"Effects of low and short medial osteotomy on postoperative neurosensory disturbances after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a split-mouth randomized study","authors":"A.T. Saygi , N. Diker , D. Dolanmaz","doi":"10.1016/j.ijom.2025.05.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The aim of this study was to compare postoperative neurosensory disturbances between the Hunsuck–Epker and ‘low and short medial osteotomy’ (LASMO) modifications of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy. The study included 21 patients aged 18–35 years who presented with dentofacial deformities and sought orthognathic surgery. A split-mouth randomized clinical trial design was employed, with osteotomies performed using the Hunsuck–Epker modification on one side and the LASMO modification on the contralateral side (total 42 osteotomies). Evaluations of neurosensory alterations were conducted in a double-blind manner at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Various assessments were conducted, including tests for painful stimuli, two-point discrimination, pressure, and brush stroke direction. Additionally, subjective neurosensory recovery was evaluated using visual analogue scale (VAS) scores reported by the patients. The results at 1, 3, and 6 months post-surgery indicated no significant difference between the two techniques for any of the parameters assessed (all <em>P</em> > 0.05). Furthermore, the patient-reported VAS scores at 6 months indicated no significant difference in neurosensory recovery between the two techniques (<em>P</em> = 0.67). In conclusion, the results of this study showed that there was no significant difference in neurosensory recovery between the LASMO modification and the Hunsuck–Epker modification.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14332,"journal":{"name":"International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery","volume":"55 2","pages":"Pages 188-194"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0901502725012895","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare postoperative neurosensory disturbances between the Hunsuck–Epker and ‘low and short medial osteotomy’ (LASMO) modifications of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy. The study included 21 patients aged 18–35 years who presented with dentofacial deformities and sought orthognathic surgery. A split-mouth randomized clinical trial design was employed, with osteotomies performed using the Hunsuck–Epker modification on one side and the LASMO modification on the contralateral side (total 42 osteotomies). Evaluations of neurosensory alterations were conducted in a double-blind manner at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Various assessments were conducted, including tests for painful stimuli, two-point discrimination, pressure, and brush stroke direction. Additionally, subjective neurosensory recovery was evaluated using visual analogue scale (VAS) scores reported by the patients. The results at 1, 3, and 6 months post-surgery indicated no significant difference between the two techniques for any of the parameters assessed (all P > 0.05). Furthermore, the patient-reported VAS scores at 6 months indicated no significant difference in neurosensory recovery between the two techniques (P = 0.67). In conclusion, the results of this study showed that there was no significant difference in neurosensory recovery between the LASMO modification and the Hunsuck–Epker modification.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery is one of the leading journals in oral and maxillofacial surgery in the world. The Journal publishes papers of the highest scientific merit and widest possible scope on work in oral and maxillofacial surgery and supporting specialties.
The Journal is divided into sections, ensuring every aspect of oral and maxillofacial surgery is covered fully through a range of invited review articles, leading clinical and research articles, technical notes, abstracts, case reports and others. The sections include:
• Congenital and craniofacial deformities
• Orthognathic Surgery/Aesthetic facial surgery
• Trauma
• TMJ disorders
• Head and neck oncology
• Reconstructive surgery
• Implantology/Dentoalveolar surgery
• Clinical Pathology
• Oral Medicine
• Research and emerging technologies.