Effects of low and short medial osteotomy on postoperative neurosensory disturbances after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a split-mouth randomized study

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
A.T. Saygi , N. Diker , D. Dolanmaz
{"title":"Effects of low and short medial osteotomy on postoperative neurosensory disturbances after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a split-mouth randomized study","authors":"A.T. Saygi ,&nbsp;N. Diker ,&nbsp;D. Dolanmaz","doi":"10.1016/j.ijom.2025.05.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The aim of this study was to compare postoperative neurosensory disturbances between the Hunsuck–Epker and ‘low and short medial osteotomy’ (LASMO) modifications of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy. The study included 21 patients aged 18–35 years who presented with dentofacial deformities and sought orthognathic surgery. A split-mouth randomized clinical trial design was employed, with osteotomies performed using the Hunsuck–Epker modification on one side and the LASMO modification on the contralateral side (total 42 osteotomies). Evaluations of neurosensory alterations were conducted in a double-blind manner at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Various assessments were conducted, including tests for painful stimuli, two-point discrimination, pressure, and brush stroke direction. Additionally, subjective neurosensory recovery was evaluated using visual analogue scale (VAS) scores reported by the patients. The results at 1, 3, and 6 months post-surgery indicated no significant difference between the two techniques for any of the parameters assessed (all <em>P</em> &gt; 0.05). Furthermore, the patient-reported VAS scores at 6 months indicated no significant difference in neurosensory recovery between the two techniques (<em>P</em> = 0.67). In conclusion, the results of this study showed that there was no significant difference in neurosensory recovery between the LASMO modification and the Hunsuck–Epker modification.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14332,"journal":{"name":"International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery","volume":"55 2","pages":"Pages 188-194"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0901502725012895","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare postoperative neurosensory disturbances between the Hunsuck–Epker and ‘low and short medial osteotomy’ (LASMO) modifications of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy. The study included 21 patients aged 18–35 years who presented with dentofacial deformities and sought orthognathic surgery. A split-mouth randomized clinical trial design was employed, with osteotomies performed using the Hunsuck–Epker modification on one side and the LASMO modification on the contralateral side (total 42 osteotomies). Evaluations of neurosensory alterations were conducted in a double-blind manner at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Various assessments were conducted, including tests for painful stimuli, two-point discrimination, pressure, and brush stroke direction. Additionally, subjective neurosensory recovery was evaluated using visual analogue scale (VAS) scores reported by the patients. The results at 1, 3, and 6 months post-surgery indicated no significant difference between the two techniques for any of the parameters assessed (all P > 0.05). Furthermore, the patient-reported VAS scores at 6 months indicated no significant difference in neurosensory recovery between the two techniques (P = 0.67). In conclusion, the results of this study showed that there was no significant difference in neurosensory recovery between the LASMO modification and the Hunsuck–Epker modification.
低和短内侧截骨术对矢状分叉支截骨术后神经感觉障碍的影响:一项裂口随机研究
本研究的目的是比较Hunsuck-Epker和“低短内侧截骨”(LASMO)矢状分支截骨术的术后神经感觉障碍。该研究包括21名年龄在18-35岁的患者,他们表现为牙面畸形并寻求正颌手术。采用裂口随机临床试验设计,一侧采用Hunsuck-Epker改良术,对侧采用LASMO改良术(共42例截骨术)。在术后1、3和6个月以双盲方式评估神经感觉改变。进行了各种评估,包括疼痛刺激、两点辨别、压力和笔触方向的测试。此外,使用患者报告的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分评估主观神经感觉恢复情况。术后1、3和6个月的结果显示,两种技术在评估的任何参数上均无显著差异(均P >; 0.05)。此外,6个月时患者报告的VAS评分显示两种技术在神经感觉恢复方面无显著差异(P = 0.67)。综上所述,本研究结果显示LASMO改良与Hunsuck-Epker改良在神经感觉恢复方面无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
318
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery is one of the leading journals in oral and maxillofacial surgery in the world. The Journal publishes papers of the highest scientific merit and widest possible scope on work in oral and maxillofacial surgery and supporting specialties. The Journal is divided into sections, ensuring every aspect of oral and maxillofacial surgery is covered fully through a range of invited review articles, leading clinical and research articles, technical notes, abstracts, case reports and others. The sections include: • Congenital and craniofacial deformities • Orthognathic Surgery/Aesthetic facial surgery • Trauma • TMJ disorders • Head and neck oncology • Reconstructive surgery • Implantology/Dentoalveolar surgery • Clinical Pathology • Oral Medicine • Research and emerging technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书