Evaluation of clinical instructors performance in radiographic assessment of primary molar furcation areas: A pilot study

Global pediatrics Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-31 DOI:10.1016/j.gpeds.2025.100317
Hyun-Joo Lim , Rojin Adabdokht , Hollis Lai, Manuel O. Lagravere Vich, Camila Pacheco-Pereira, Naeem Hedayatipoor, Ida Kornerup
{"title":"Evaluation of clinical instructors performance in radiographic assessment of primary molar furcation areas: A pilot study","authors":"Hyun-Joo Lim ,&nbsp;Rojin Adabdokht ,&nbsp;Hollis Lai,&nbsp;Manuel O. Lagravere Vich,&nbsp;Camila Pacheco-Pereira,&nbsp;Naeem Hedayatipoor,&nbsp;Ida Kornerup","doi":"10.1016/j.gpeds.2025.100317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose and Background</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance, agreement, and consistency of pediatric dentistry instructors in radiographic diagnosis of furcation lesions. Radiographic identification of furcation lesions in primary molars is challenging due to the superimposition of anatomic features and the developing permanent tooth buds. Clinical instructors’ inconsistencies in diagnosing this lesion may compromise patient outcomes and student training.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Eight clinical instructors assessed 20 radiographs in two blinded rounds. A validated reference diagnosis dataset was established by two calibrated specialists, using paired pre-treatment and follow-up radiographs. Total and subgroup analysis was performed between instructors with and without specialty training. Diagnostic performance was measured by sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Agreement and consistency were evaluated using Fleiss’ and Cohen’s Kappa.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 0.75, 0.77, and 0.76, respectively, with no significant differences between pediatric specialists and general dentists (<em>p</em> = 0.79). Agreement was moderate overall (<em>K</em> = 0.50 - 0.59), ranging from fair to moderate in general dentists and substantial in specialists. Intra-rater consistency was substantial to almost perfect overall and in both groups (<em>K</em> = 0.62- 0.82).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Instructors demonstrated satisfactory accuracy and high intra-rater consistency in diagnosing furcation lesions, however inter-rater agreement was suboptimal. Standardized guidelines or could improve calibration and teaching reliability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73173,"journal":{"name":"Global pediatrics","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100317"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667009725000752","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose and Background

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance, agreement, and consistency of pediatric dentistry instructors in radiographic diagnosis of furcation lesions. Radiographic identification of furcation lesions in primary molars is challenging due to the superimposition of anatomic features and the developing permanent tooth buds. Clinical instructors’ inconsistencies in diagnosing this lesion may compromise patient outcomes and student training.

Methods

Eight clinical instructors assessed 20 radiographs in two blinded rounds. A validated reference diagnosis dataset was established by two calibrated specialists, using paired pre-treatment and follow-up radiographs. Total and subgroup analysis was performed between instructors with and without specialty training. Diagnostic performance was measured by sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Agreement and consistency were evaluated using Fleiss’ and Cohen’s Kappa.

Results

Overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 0.75, 0.77, and 0.76, respectively, with no significant differences between pediatric specialists and general dentists (p = 0.79). Agreement was moderate overall (K = 0.50 - 0.59), ranging from fair to moderate in general dentists and substantial in specialists. Intra-rater consistency was substantial to almost perfect overall and in both groups (K = 0.62- 0.82).

Conclusions

Instructors demonstrated satisfactory accuracy and high intra-rater consistency in diagnosing furcation lesions, however inter-rater agreement was suboptimal. Standardized guidelines or could improve calibration and teaching reliability.

Abstract Image

评价临床指导员在初磨牙分叉区影像学评估中的表现:一项初步研究
目的与背景本研究旨在评估儿科牙科教师在分叉性病变的影像学诊断中的表现、一致性和一致性。由于初生磨牙的解剖特征和恒牙的发育,对其分叉病变的x线鉴别具有挑战性。临床教师在诊断这种病变时的不一致可能会损害患者的预后和学生的培训。方法8名临床指导员对20张x线片进行盲法评估。两名校准的专家使用配对的预处理和随访x线片建立了一个有效的参考诊断数据集。在接受和未接受专业培训的教员之间进行总体和亚组分析。诊断性能通过敏感性、特异性和准确性来衡量。采用Fleiss和Cohen的Kappa评估一致性和一致性。结果总体敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为0.75、0.77和0.76,儿科专科医生与普通牙医之间差异无统计学意义(p = 0.79)。一致性总体上为中等(K = 0.50 - 0.59),在普通牙医中为一般到中等,在专科牙医中为相当。总体而言,两组的内部一致性几乎是完美的(K = 0.62- 0.82)。结论指导者对分叉病变的诊断具有较高的准确性和一致性,但对分叉病变的一致性不理想。标准化的指导方针或可以提高校准和教学的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global pediatrics
Global pediatrics Perinatology, Pediatrics and Child Health
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书