The role of charging infrastructure and income on electric vehicle adoption

IF 9.3 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Energy Policy Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-23 DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2026.115098
Thomas Gifford, Edward Barbier
{"title":"The role of charging infrastructure and income on electric vehicle adoption","authors":"Thomas Gifford,&nbsp;Edward Barbier","doi":"10.1016/j.enpol.2026.115098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper examines how the expansion of public charging infrastructure influences electric vehicle (EV) adoption across income levels. Using county-level panel data from Washington State (2019–2023), we estimate the marginal effect of new chargers on EV uptake and test for heterogeneity by income and charger type. We find that charger deployment increases EV adoption, but the effect is concentrated in high-income counties. Fast chargers generate larger and more widely distributed adoption gains than slower charging options, and income consistently conditions these effects. These patterns appear only in the battery electric vehicle (BEV) market; comparable models for plug-in hybrid vehicles (PHEVs) show no significant relationships. Robustness checks also indicate that charger deployment drives BEV growth rather than responding to it. These results highlight both the central role of infrastructure in enabling decarbonized transport and the risk that exclusive reliance on chargers may widen inequities, underscoring the need for complementary policies that expand access to zero-emission mobility. Charging investments alone may not yield equitable adoption outcomes and underscore the importance of complementary policies that address barriers to entry beyond charging availability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11672,"journal":{"name":"Energy Policy","volume":"211 ","pages":"Article 115098"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421526000327","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines how the expansion of public charging infrastructure influences electric vehicle (EV) adoption across income levels. Using county-level panel data from Washington State (2019–2023), we estimate the marginal effect of new chargers on EV uptake and test for heterogeneity by income and charger type. We find that charger deployment increases EV adoption, but the effect is concentrated in high-income counties. Fast chargers generate larger and more widely distributed adoption gains than slower charging options, and income consistently conditions these effects. These patterns appear only in the battery electric vehicle (BEV) market; comparable models for plug-in hybrid vehicles (PHEVs) show no significant relationships. Robustness checks also indicate that charger deployment drives BEV growth rather than responding to it. These results highlight both the central role of infrastructure in enabling decarbonized transport and the risk that exclusive reliance on chargers may widen inequities, underscoring the need for complementary policies that expand access to zero-emission mobility. Charging investments alone may not yield equitable adoption outcomes and underscore the importance of complementary policies that address barriers to entry beyond charging availability.
充电基础设施和收入对电动汽车普及的影响
本文研究了公共充电基础设施的扩张如何影响不同收入水平的电动汽车(EV)的采用。利用华盛顿州(2019-2023)的县级面板数据,我们估计了新充电器对电动汽车吸收的边际效应,并测试了收入和充电器类型的异质性。我们发现,充电器的部署增加了电动汽车的使用率,但这种影响主要集中在高收入国家。与慢速充电相比,快速充电带来了更大、更广泛的采用收益,而收入一直制约着这些影响。这些模式只出现在纯电动汽车(BEV)市场;插电式混合动力汽车(phev)的可比模型没有显示出显著的关系。稳健性检查还表明,充电器的部署推动了纯电动汽车的增长,而不是对其做出反应。这些结果强调了基础设施在实现脱碳运输方面的核心作用,以及完全依赖充电器可能扩大不平等的风险,强调了扩大零排放交通的补充政策的必要性。仅靠收费投资可能无法产生公平的采用结果,并强调了解决收费可用性之外的进入壁垒的补充政策的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Policy
Energy Policy 管理科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
540
审稿时长
7.9 months
期刊介绍: Energy policy is the manner in which a given entity (often governmental) has decided to address issues of energy development including energy conversion, distribution and use as well as reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in order to contribute to climate change mitigation. The attributes of energy policy may include legislation, international treaties, incentives to investment, guidelines for energy conservation, taxation and other public policy techniques. Energy policy is closely related to climate change policy because totalled worldwide the energy sector emits more greenhouse gas than other sectors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书