Machine learning prediction of failure load in composite and metallic single-lap adhesive joints

IF 3.5 3区 材料科学 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Bahador Bahrami , Saba Abbaszadeh , Hossein Talebi , Majid R. Ayatollahi , Mohammad Reza Khosravani
{"title":"Machine learning prediction of failure load in composite and metallic single-lap adhesive joints","authors":"Bahador Bahrami ,&nbsp;Saba Abbaszadeh ,&nbsp;Hossein Talebi ,&nbsp;Majid R. Ayatollahi ,&nbsp;Mohammad Reza Khosravani","doi":"10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2026.104265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the present study, various machine learning (ML) models were developed to predict the failure loads of single-lap joints (SLJs). Initially, data were gathered from the existing literature, notably including composite adherends, which present unique challenges for failure load prediction due to their anisotropic behavior and complex fracture mechanisms. Approximately 38 % of the total gathered data (167 out of 440 data points) consisted of structures with composite adherends. Subsequently, the feature-selection methods identified key predictive features, and the preprocessing techniques identified the optimal scaler. Several ML models were constructed and then optimized using different methods. Additionally, using 45 unseen data points, 35 % of which consisted of structures with composite adherends, the generalization of the models was assessed. In the next step, to interpret the constructed models, the shapley additive explanations (SHAP) method was employed. Moreover, to contextualize the identified features with previous physical findings, partial dependence plots (PDPs) were generated, ensuring the models’ reliability. The gradient boosting regressor (GBR) model achieved the best mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) among all the models built, indicating about 11 % MAPE on the unseen dataset, presenting the most favorable performance. Ultimately, in comparison to the conventional numerical and analytical methods, which are highly computationally expensive, the accurate results of the proposed ML framework affirmed its potential as a viable alternative to these methods.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13732,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives","volume":"147 ","pages":"Article 104265"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143749626000072","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the present study, various machine learning (ML) models were developed to predict the failure loads of single-lap joints (SLJs). Initially, data were gathered from the existing literature, notably including composite adherends, which present unique challenges for failure load prediction due to their anisotropic behavior and complex fracture mechanisms. Approximately 38 % of the total gathered data (167 out of 440 data points) consisted of structures with composite adherends. Subsequently, the feature-selection methods identified key predictive features, and the preprocessing techniques identified the optimal scaler. Several ML models were constructed and then optimized using different methods. Additionally, using 45 unseen data points, 35 % of which consisted of structures with composite adherends, the generalization of the models was assessed. In the next step, to interpret the constructed models, the shapley additive explanations (SHAP) method was employed. Moreover, to contextualize the identified features with previous physical findings, partial dependence plots (PDPs) were generated, ensuring the models’ reliability. The gradient boosting regressor (GBR) model achieved the best mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) among all the models built, indicating about 11 % MAPE on the unseen dataset, presenting the most favorable performance. Ultimately, in comparison to the conventional numerical and analytical methods, which are highly computationally expensive, the accurate results of the proposed ML framework affirmed its potential as a viable alternative to these methods.
复合材料和金属单搭接接头失效载荷的机器学习预测
在本研究中,开发了各种机器学习(ML)模型来预测单搭接节点(slj)的破坏载荷。最初,数据是从现有文献中收集的,特别是包括复合材料粘附体,由于其各向异性行为和复杂的断裂机制,对失效载荷预测提出了独特的挑战。大约38%的总收集数据(440个数据点中的167个)由具有复合粘附物的结构组成。随后,特征选择方法识别关键预测特征,预处理技术识别最优尺度。构建了多个机器学习模型,并用不同的方法对模型进行了优化。此外,使用45个看不见的数据点,其中35%由具有复合附着物的结构组成,评估了模型的泛化性。下一步,对构建的模型进行解释,采用shapley加性解释(SHAP)方法。此外,为了将识别出的特征与之前的物理发现联系起来,生成了部分依赖图(pdp),以确保模型的可靠性。梯度增强回归(gradient boosting regressor, GBR)模型的平均绝对百分比误差(mean absolute percentage error, MAPE)在未见数据集上达到11%左右,表现出最优的性能。最终,与传统的计算成本很高的数值和分析方法相比,所提出的ML框架的准确结果肯定了它作为这些方法的可行替代方案的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives
International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
8.80%
发文量
200
审稿时长
8.3 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives draws together the many aspects of the science and technology of adhesive materials, from fundamental research and development work to industrial applications. Subject areas covered include: interfacial interactions, surface chemistry, methods of testing, accumulation of test data on physical and mechanical properties, environmental effects, new adhesive materials, sealants, design of bonded joints, and manufacturing technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书