What roles do constituents play in the identification of Chinese compound words? A meta-analytic review

IF 3.5 1区 心理学 Q1 LINGUISTICS
Journal of memory and language Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-21 DOI:10.1016/j.jml.2026.104743
Qiwei Zhang , Junhui Wu , Erik D. Reichle , Xingshan Li
{"title":"What roles do constituents play in the identification of Chinese compound words? A meta-analytic review","authors":"Qiwei Zhang ,&nbsp;Junhui Wu ,&nbsp;Erik D. Reichle ,&nbsp;Xingshan Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jml.2026.104743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Because compound words comprised of two (or more) constituents make up the majority of Chinese vocabulary, understanding how they are processed and identified is critical for understanding the mechanisms that support the reading of Chinese. This <em>meta</em>-analytic review thus investigated whether Chinese compound words are processed and identified in a compositional versus holistic manner. Our <em>meta</em>-analysis includes 268 constituent effect sizes derived from 81 studies involving 5,911 participants. Overall, we found a statistically significant, albeit small, constituent effect (Hedges’ <em>g</em><sub>rm</sub> = 0.22, 95% CI [0.18, 0.25]). The magnitude of this effect varied across study designs, being significantly larger when words were presented in isolation than within sentences, and in studies using preview methods rather than natural reading. Consistent with compositional processing, evidence from both behavioral and neurophysiological experiments also suggested that constituent effects occurred at the orthographic, phonological, and semantic processing levels. These findings highlight the significant role of constituents in Chinese compound-word identification, encompassing both form and semantics. Finally, although these discoveries have significant implications for existing and future models of Chinese reading, we should warn the readers that the average effect sizes should be interpreted with caution. The present study showed substantial heterogeneity, which calls for future studies to understand the underlying reasons for the variabilities across studies.</div></div><div><h3>Public Significance Statement</h3><div>This <em>meta</em>-analysis suggests that, in Chinese reading, individual constituents of compound words have a small but significant facilitative effect on their orthographic, phonological, and semantic processing across different word presentation methods and tasks. These findings are important for understanding how compound words are processed and identified in Chinese but also shed light on the universal mechanisms of compound-word processing across languages. These findings also suggest that the unique properties of a language’s script influence the cognitive mechanisms that support word identification. In the future, the findings from this study may help improve the efficiency of Chinese language instruction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16493,"journal":{"name":"Journal of memory and language","volume":"148 ","pages":"Article 104743"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of memory and language","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749596X26000136","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Because compound words comprised of two (or more) constituents make up the majority of Chinese vocabulary, understanding how they are processed and identified is critical for understanding the mechanisms that support the reading of Chinese. This meta-analytic review thus investigated whether Chinese compound words are processed and identified in a compositional versus holistic manner. Our meta-analysis includes 268 constituent effect sizes derived from 81 studies involving 5,911 participants. Overall, we found a statistically significant, albeit small, constituent effect (Hedges’ grm = 0.22, 95% CI [0.18, 0.25]). The magnitude of this effect varied across study designs, being significantly larger when words were presented in isolation than within sentences, and in studies using preview methods rather than natural reading. Consistent with compositional processing, evidence from both behavioral and neurophysiological experiments also suggested that constituent effects occurred at the orthographic, phonological, and semantic processing levels. These findings highlight the significant role of constituents in Chinese compound-word identification, encompassing both form and semantics. Finally, although these discoveries have significant implications for existing and future models of Chinese reading, we should warn the readers that the average effect sizes should be interpreted with caution. The present study showed substantial heterogeneity, which calls for future studies to understand the underlying reasons for the variabilities across studies.

Public Significance Statement

This meta-analysis suggests that, in Chinese reading, individual constituents of compound words have a small but significant facilitative effect on their orthographic, phonological, and semantic processing across different word presentation methods and tasks. These findings are important for understanding how compound words are processed and identified in Chinese but also shed light on the universal mechanisms of compound-word processing across languages. These findings also suggest that the unique properties of a language’s script influence the cognitive mechanisms that support word identification. In the future, the findings from this study may help improve the efficiency of Chinese language instruction.
成分在汉语复合词识别中起什么作用?元分析综述
由于汉语词汇的大部分是由两种(或两种以上)成分组成的复合词,了解它们是如何被加工和识别的,对于理解支持汉语阅读的机制至关重要。这篇元分析综述探讨了汉语复合词的加工和识别方式是整体方式还是组合方式。我们的荟萃分析包括来自81项涉及5,911名参与者的研究的268个成分效应量。总体而言,我们发现了统计学上显著的成分效应(Hedges的grm = 0.22, 95% CI[0.18, 0.25])。这种影响的程度在不同的研究设计中有所不同,当单词单独呈现时比在句子中呈现时明显更大,并且在使用预览方法而不是自然阅读的研究中。与构成加工一致,来自行为和神经生理实验的证据也表明,构成效应发生在正字法、语音和语义加工水平。这些发现强调了成分在汉语复合词识别中的重要作用,包括形式和语义。最后,尽管这些发现对现有和未来的中文阅读模型具有重要意义,但我们应该提醒读者,在解释平均效应量时应谨慎。目前的研究显示了大量的异质性,这需要未来的研究来了解研究差异的潜在原因。公共意义声明本荟萃分析表明,在汉语阅读中,复合词的个别成分在不同的单词呈现方式和任务中对其正字法、语音和语义加工具有虽小但显著的促进作用。这些发现对于理解汉语复合词的加工和识别过程具有重要意义,同时也揭示了跨语言复合词加工的普遍机制。这些发现还表明,语言文字的独特属性影响了支持单词识别的认知机制。在未来,本研究的发现可能有助于提高语文教学的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
14.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
12.7 weeks
期刊介绍: Articles in the Journal of Memory and Language contribute to the formulation of scientific issues and theories in the areas of memory, language comprehension and production, and cognitive processes. Special emphasis is given to research articles that provide new theoretical insights based on a carefully laid empirical foundation. The journal generally favors articles that provide multiple experiments. In addition, significant theoretical papers without new experimental findings may be published. The Journal of Memory and Language is a valuable tool for cognitive scientists, including psychologists, linguists, and others interested in memory and learning, language, reading, and speech. Research Areas include: • Topics that illuminate aspects of memory or language processing • Linguistics • Neuropsychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书