Cost-Utility Analysis of Acupuncture for the Prevention of Episodic Migraine from a Lifetime Canadian Health System and Societal Perspective.

IF 0.9 Q4 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Medical Acupuncture Pub Date : 2025-12-08 eCollection Date: 2025-12-01 DOI:10.1089/acu.2024.0102
Elizabeth C Wu, Rebecca Hancock-Howard, Brian C F Chan, Peter C Coyte
{"title":"Cost-Utility Analysis of Acupuncture for the Prevention of Episodic Migraine from a Lifetime Canadian Health System and Societal Perspective.","authors":"Elizabeth C Wu, Rebecca Hancock-Howard, Brian C F Chan, Peter C Coyte","doi":"10.1089/acu.2024.0102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the lifetime cost-effectiveness of acupuncture in the prevention of episodic migraine from both a Canadian public health care payer and societal perspective.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Acupuncture has been used for pain relief for thousands of years in China and could be an alternative to drugs in managing pain. Nevertheless, there is limited evidence to determine if acupuncture is cost-effective in migraine prevention in the Canadian setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cost-utility analysis with a decision-analytic Markov model was constructed to compare acupuncture with drug prophylaxis and no active treatment among adult patients with episodic migraine over their lifetime. The efficacy inputs (migraine days) were based on a Cochrane systematic literature review. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were the modeled health outcome. Direct and indirect medical costs were derived from a Canadian burden of illness study on patients with migraine. All costs were inflated and reported as the present value of lifetime costs in 2021 Canadian dollars (CAD), discounting at 1.5%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From a health system perspective, acupuncture was cost-effective when compared with no active treatment (CAD 35,060/QALY) and drug prophylaxis (CAD 47,128/QALY) at a willingness-to-pay threshold of CAD 50,000/QALY gained. Acupuncture was dominant compared with no active treatment and drug prophylaxis from a societal perspective. Cost savings were driven by reduced productivity loss from fewer migraine days with acupuncture treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Acupuncture could be a cost-effective option for patients with episodic migraine. Future studies are encouraged to inform decisions regarding the use of acupuncture in the management of episodic migraine.</p>","PeriodicalId":45511,"journal":{"name":"Medical Acupuncture","volume":"37 6","pages":"466-478"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12820661/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Acupuncture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/acu.2024.0102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the lifetime cost-effectiveness of acupuncture in the prevention of episodic migraine from both a Canadian public health care payer and societal perspective.

Background: Acupuncture has been used for pain relief for thousands of years in China and could be an alternative to drugs in managing pain. Nevertheless, there is limited evidence to determine if acupuncture is cost-effective in migraine prevention in the Canadian setting.

Methods: A cost-utility analysis with a decision-analytic Markov model was constructed to compare acupuncture with drug prophylaxis and no active treatment among adult patients with episodic migraine over their lifetime. The efficacy inputs (migraine days) were based on a Cochrane systematic literature review. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were the modeled health outcome. Direct and indirect medical costs were derived from a Canadian burden of illness study on patients with migraine. All costs were inflated and reported as the present value of lifetime costs in 2021 Canadian dollars (CAD), discounting at 1.5%.

Results: From a health system perspective, acupuncture was cost-effective when compared with no active treatment (CAD 35,060/QALY) and drug prophylaxis (CAD 47,128/QALY) at a willingness-to-pay threshold of CAD 50,000/QALY gained. Acupuncture was dominant compared with no active treatment and drug prophylaxis from a societal perspective. Cost savings were driven by reduced productivity loss from fewer migraine days with acupuncture treatment.

Conclusion: Acupuncture could be a cost-effective option for patients with episodic migraine. Future studies are encouraged to inform decisions regarding the use of acupuncture in the management of episodic migraine.

从加拿大健康系统和社会角度对针灸预防阵发性偏头痛的成本-效用分析。
目的:从加拿大公共卫生保健支付者和社会的角度评估针灸预防发作性偏头痛的终生成本效益。背景:针灸在中国用于缓解疼痛已有数千年的历史,可以作为药物治疗疼痛的替代品。然而,在加拿大,确定针灸在预防偏头痛方面是否具有成本效益的证据有限。方法:采用决策分析马尔可夫模型进行成本-效用分析,比较针刺与药物预防和不积极治疗对成年偏头痛患者一生的影响。疗效输入(偏头痛天数)基于Cochrane系统文献综述。质量调整生命年(QALYs)是模拟的健康结果。直接和间接医疗费用来源于加拿大对偏头痛患者的疾病负担研究。所有成本都被夸大,并以2021年加元(CAD)的生命周期成本现值报告,折扣率为1.5%。结果:从卫生系统的角度来看,在支付意愿阈值为5万加元/QALY时,与无积极治疗(35,060加元/QALY)和药物预防(47,128加元/QALY)相比,针灸具有成本效益。从社会角度来看,针灸治疗占主导地位,而非积极治疗和药物预防。通过针灸治疗减少偏头痛天数,降低了生产力损失,从而节省了成本。结论:针灸治疗阵发性偏头痛是一种经济有效的治疗方法。未来的研究被鼓励告知关于使用针灸治疗发作性偏头痛的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Acupuncture
Medical Acupuncture INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
18.20%
发文量
73
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书