From expansion to overshoot: Policy risks in managing offshore fisheries expansion

IF 3.9 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Marine Policy Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-23 DOI:10.1016/j.marpol.2026.107059
T.R. McClanahan
{"title":"From expansion to overshoot: Policy risks in managing offshore fisheries expansion","authors":"T.R. McClanahan","doi":"10.1016/j.marpol.2026.107059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Fishing grounds frequently expand as overfishing of the nearshore promotes policies to increase access and economic incentives to target offshore resources. Subsidies for boats, gear, and fuel have been introduced to shift effort offshore and compensate for declining catches. Therefore, I tested the hypothesis that fishing area expansion would increase the use of offshore-oriented gears and benthic catch losses would be compensated by increased pelagics. To evaluate these increased access strategies, I analyzed 23 years of effort, gear use, and catch data from 13 nearshore fisheries in Kenya, nine of which expanded spatially while four remained stable. Initially, expansion correlated with higher fishing effort and increased use of beach seines and ring nets. Beach seine use declined in the non-expanding and rose in the expanding fisheries, despite being made illegal 6 years after catch measurements began. Thereafter, effort and catch rates declined rapidly below the initial and non-expanding fisheries values. Pelagic catches rose cyclically after the decline but for 15 years failed to fully offset benthic losses. Although nearshore fishable biomass and production recovered modestly as fisher numbers fell, capture consistently exceeded local ecological production. Policies promoting offshore fishing access should consider that pelagic yields are potentially low and episodic and may not reliably replace the higher and more stable benthic production. To achieve nearshore fish recovery, enhanced resource protection coincident with offshore access will be required.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48427,"journal":{"name":"Marine Policy","volume":"187 ","pages":"Article 107059"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X26000291","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fishing grounds frequently expand as overfishing of the nearshore promotes policies to increase access and economic incentives to target offshore resources. Subsidies for boats, gear, and fuel have been introduced to shift effort offshore and compensate for declining catches. Therefore, I tested the hypothesis that fishing area expansion would increase the use of offshore-oriented gears and benthic catch losses would be compensated by increased pelagics. To evaluate these increased access strategies, I analyzed 23 years of effort, gear use, and catch data from 13 nearshore fisheries in Kenya, nine of which expanded spatially while four remained stable. Initially, expansion correlated with higher fishing effort and increased use of beach seines and ring nets. Beach seine use declined in the non-expanding and rose in the expanding fisheries, despite being made illegal 6 years after catch measurements began. Thereafter, effort and catch rates declined rapidly below the initial and non-expanding fisheries values. Pelagic catches rose cyclically after the decline but for 15 years failed to fully offset benthic losses. Although nearshore fishable biomass and production recovered modestly as fisher numbers fell, capture consistently exceeded local ecological production. Policies promoting offshore fishing access should consider that pelagic yields are potentially low and episodic and may not reliably replace the higher and more stable benthic production. To achieve nearshore fish recovery, enhanced resource protection coincident with offshore access will be required.
从扩张到超调:管理近海渔业扩张的政策风险
渔场经常扩大,因为近岸的过度捕捞促进了增加近海资源的获取和经济激励的政策。对渔船、渔具和燃料的补贴已被引入,以将努力转移到近海,并弥补捕捞量的下降。因此,我测试了一个假设,即捕鱼区域的扩大会增加近海渔具的使用,底栖生物的捕捞损失会通过增加远洋来弥补。为了评估这些增加的获取策略,我分析了23年来肯尼亚13个近岸渔场的努力、渔具使用和捕捞数据,其中9个在空间上扩大,4个保持稳定。最初,扩张与更高的捕鱼努力和更多地使用海滩围网和环网有关。在没有扩张的渔场,海滩围网的使用减少了,而在扩张的渔场,围网的使用增加了,尽管在开始测量渔获量的6年后,它被定为非法。此后,努力量和渔获率迅速下降到最初和未扩大的渔业值以下。远洋捕获量在下降后周期性上升,但15年来未能完全抵消底栖生物的损失。虽然近岸可捕捞生物量和产量随着渔民数量的下降而适度恢复,但捕捞量始终超过当地的生态产量。促进近海捕鱼的政策应考虑到远洋产量可能很低,而且是偶发性的,可能无法可靠地取代较高和更稳定的底栖生物产量。为了实现近岸鱼类的恢复,需要加强资源保护,同时进行近海捕捞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Marine Policy
Marine Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
13.20%
发文量
428
期刊介绍: Marine Policy is the leading journal of ocean policy studies. It offers researchers, analysts and policy makers a unique combination of analyses in the principal social science disciplines relevant to the formulation of marine policy. Major articles are contributed by specialists in marine affairs, including marine economists and marine resource managers, political scientists, marine scientists, international lawyers, geographers and anthropologists. Drawing on their expertise and research, the journal covers: international, regional and national marine policies; institutional arrangements for the management and regulation of marine activities, including fisheries and shipping; conflict resolution; marine pollution and environment; conservation and use of marine resources. Regular features of Marine Policy include research reports, conference reports and reports on current developments to keep readers up-to-date with the latest developments and research in ocean affairs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书