{"title":"Innovative evaluation of precast, prestressed adjacent box beam bridges","authors":"Yugesh Maharjan, Suraj Dhungel, Serhan Guner","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2026.122195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Load rating, the process of evaluating a bridge's safe live load capacity, is a critical aspect of bridge evaluation. Despite their prevalence, adjacent box beam bridges lack specialized methodologies and automated tools for their load rating. Engineers often resort to time-consuming, complex hand calculations or general-purpose tools that are not ideal for these unique bridges. This study addresses this challenge by developing a specialized computational methodology and an innovative computer tool for accurate, reliable, and rapid load rating of adjacent box beam bridges. The research accounts for diverse configurations, including skewed or non-skewed spans, composite and non-composite, and single or multicell beam sections; analyzes flexure and shear; assesses stresses at all critical locations for strength and service limit states; calculates capacities; and provides final load rating factors. A key innovation is its ability to identify the most critical location by precisely determining the exact maximum moment location, beyond conventional methods. It also evaluates shear at all potentially critical points, not just typical ones. The adopted shear flow approach enables the analysis of multicell box beam sections. To transfer these advancements to practice, the first specialized computer tool is developed for the load rating of adjacent box beam bridges. This tool is capable of rating 15 standard vehicles and custom vehicles with up to 35 axles. It also generates moment and shear envelopes for all vehicle types, assisting manual calculations or other analyses for various bridge types. Verification of the methodology and tool against 18 existing bridges using independent hand calculations and general-purpose software confirmed their high accuracy and reliability. A coefficient of determination of 0.974 or higher, a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.251 or lower, a normalized RMSE of 7.43 % or lower and a bias close to zero are obtained.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"353 ","pages":"Article 122195"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029626001082","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Load rating, the process of evaluating a bridge's safe live load capacity, is a critical aspect of bridge evaluation. Despite their prevalence, adjacent box beam bridges lack specialized methodologies and automated tools for their load rating. Engineers often resort to time-consuming, complex hand calculations or general-purpose tools that are not ideal for these unique bridges. This study addresses this challenge by developing a specialized computational methodology and an innovative computer tool for accurate, reliable, and rapid load rating of adjacent box beam bridges. The research accounts for diverse configurations, including skewed or non-skewed spans, composite and non-composite, and single or multicell beam sections; analyzes flexure and shear; assesses stresses at all critical locations for strength and service limit states; calculates capacities; and provides final load rating factors. A key innovation is its ability to identify the most critical location by precisely determining the exact maximum moment location, beyond conventional methods. It also evaluates shear at all potentially critical points, not just typical ones. The adopted shear flow approach enables the analysis of multicell box beam sections. To transfer these advancements to practice, the first specialized computer tool is developed for the load rating of adjacent box beam bridges. This tool is capable of rating 15 standard vehicles and custom vehicles with up to 35 axles. It also generates moment and shear envelopes for all vehicle types, assisting manual calculations or other analyses for various bridge types. Verification of the methodology and tool against 18 existing bridges using independent hand calculations and general-purpose software confirmed their high accuracy and reliability. A coefficient of determination of 0.974 or higher, a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.251 or lower, a normalized RMSE of 7.43 % or lower and a bias close to zero are obtained.
期刊介绍:
Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed.
The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering.
Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels.
Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.