Innovative evaluation of precast, prestressed adjacent box beam bridges

IF 6.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Engineering Structures Pub Date : 2026-04-15 Epub Date: 2026-01-22 DOI:10.1016/j.engstruct.2026.122195
Yugesh Maharjan, Suraj Dhungel, Serhan Guner
{"title":"Innovative evaluation of precast, prestressed adjacent box beam bridges","authors":"Yugesh Maharjan,&nbsp;Suraj Dhungel,&nbsp;Serhan Guner","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2026.122195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Load rating, the process of evaluating a bridge's safe live load capacity, is a critical aspect of bridge evaluation. Despite their prevalence, adjacent box beam bridges lack specialized methodologies and automated tools for their load rating. Engineers often resort to time-consuming, complex hand calculations or general-purpose tools that are not ideal for these unique bridges. This study addresses this challenge by developing a specialized computational methodology and an innovative computer tool for accurate, reliable, and rapid load rating of adjacent box beam bridges. The research accounts for diverse configurations, including skewed or non-skewed spans, composite and non-composite, and single or multicell beam sections; analyzes flexure and shear; assesses stresses at all critical locations for strength and service limit states; calculates capacities; and provides final load rating factors. A key innovation is its ability to identify the most critical location by precisely determining the exact maximum moment location, beyond conventional methods. It also evaluates shear at all potentially critical points, not just typical ones. The adopted shear flow approach enables the analysis of multicell box beam sections. To transfer these advancements to practice, the first specialized computer tool is developed for the load rating of adjacent box beam bridges. This tool is capable of rating 15 standard vehicles and custom vehicles with up to 35 axles. It also generates moment and shear envelopes for all vehicle types, assisting manual calculations or other analyses for various bridge types. Verification of the methodology and tool against 18 existing bridges using independent hand calculations and general-purpose software confirmed their high accuracy and reliability. A coefficient of determination of 0.974 or higher, a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.251 or lower, a normalized RMSE of 7.43 % or lower and a bias close to zero are obtained.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"353 ","pages":"Article 122195"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029626001082","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Load rating, the process of evaluating a bridge's safe live load capacity, is a critical aspect of bridge evaluation. Despite their prevalence, adjacent box beam bridges lack specialized methodologies and automated tools for their load rating. Engineers often resort to time-consuming, complex hand calculations or general-purpose tools that are not ideal for these unique bridges. This study addresses this challenge by developing a specialized computational methodology and an innovative computer tool for accurate, reliable, and rapid load rating of adjacent box beam bridges. The research accounts for diverse configurations, including skewed or non-skewed spans, composite and non-composite, and single or multicell beam sections; analyzes flexure and shear; assesses stresses at all critical locations for strength and service limit states; calculates capacities; and provides final load rating factors. A key innovation is its ability to identify the most critical location by precisely determining the exact maximum moment location, beyond conventional methods. It also evaluates shear at all potentially critical points, not just typical ones. The adopted shear flow approach enables the analysis of multicell box beam sections. To transfer these advancements to practice, the first specialized computer tool is developed for the load rating of adjacent box beam bridges. This tool is capable of rating 15 standard vehicles and custom vehicles with up to 35 axles. It also generates moment and shear envelopes for all vehicle types, assisting manual calculations or other analyses for various bridge types. Verification of the methodology and tool against 18 existing bridges using independent hand calculations and general-purpose software confirmed their high accuracy and reliability. A coefficient of determination of 0.974 or higher, a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.251 or lower, a normalized RMSE of 7.43 % or lower and a bias close to zero are obtained.
预制、预应力相邻箱梁桥的创新评价
荷载等级是评估桥梁安全活载能力的过程,是桥梁评估的一个重要方面。尽管它们很普遍,但相邻箱梁桥缺乏专门的方法和自动化工具来确定其荷载等级。工程师们经常求助于耗时、复杂的手工计算或通用工具,而这些工具并不适合这些独特的桥梁。本研究通过开发一种专门的计算方法和一种创新的计算机工具来解决这一挑战,该工具可以准确、可靠和快速地对相邻箱梁桥进行荷载评定。该研究考虑了不同的结构,包括倾斜或非倾斜跨度,复合和非复合,单室或多室梁截面;分析弯曲和剪切;评估所有关键位置的强度和使用极限状态的应力;计算能力;并提供最终负载额定系数。一个关键的创新是它能够通过精确确定最大力矩位置来识别最关键的位置,而不是传统的方法。它还评估了所有潜在临界点的剪切,而不仅仅是典型的临界点。所采用的剪切流法使多室箱梁截面分析成为可能。为了将这些进步应用到实践中,第一个专门的计算机工具被开发出来用于相邻箱梁桥的荷载等级。该工具能够额定15标准车辆和定制车辆,最多可达35轴。它还生成所有车辆类型的弯矩和剪切包络,协助手动计算或各种桥梁类型的其他分析。使用独立的手工计算和通用软件对18座现有桥梁的方法和工具进行了验证,证实了它们的准确性和可靠性。确定系数为0.974或更高,均方根误差(RMSE)为0.251或更低,归一化RMSE为7.43 %或更低,偏差接近于零。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Engineering Structures
Engineering Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
14.50%
发文量
1385
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed. The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering. Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels. Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书