From symbiosis to co-prosperity: Redefining industry-city integration for urban resilience

IF 12.2 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Environmental Impact Assessment Review Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-19 DOI:10.1016/j.eiar.2026.108349
Yunsheng Bai , Gengyuan Liu , Yang Guo , Nan Zhang , Frederick Kwame Yeboah , Pei Wang , Zhaobo Liu , Liang Dong
{"title":"From symbiosis to co-prosperity: Redefining industry-city integration for urban resilience","authors":"Yunsheng Bai ,&nbsp;Gengyuan Liu ,&nbsp;Yang Guo ,&nbsp;Nan Zhang ,&nbsp;Frederick Kwame Yeboah ,&nbsp;Pei Wang ,&nbsp;Zhaobo Liu ,&nbsp;Liang Dong","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2026.108349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper explores the conceptual and practical expansion of industrial symbiosis (IS) to the realm of industry-city integration (ICI), and further proposes industry-city co-prosperity as a new paradigm for sustainable urban-industrial development. A systematic literature review was conducted. This review analyzed 132 selected studies to trace the evolution from firm-centered IS network to multi-scalar urban-industrial synergies. The results indicate that traditional IS, while successful in enabling resource-sharing among firms, remains limited by spatial confinement and administrative boundaries. ICI bridges this gap by redefining the city as a functional node of industrial and talent chains, extending symbiotic practices to cross-regional metabolic flows and social integration. A typology of three distinct governance models for ICI (Top-Down Planning, Self-Organizing, and Government-Promotion) is developed and a multi-dimensional comparative analysis of international cases under each model is conducted. The findings reveal that no single model is sufficient; instead, a hybrid governance architecture is essential to overcome administrative silos and foster emerging circular service industries. The paper concludes that aligning industrial development with urban sustainability requires moving beyond resource efficiency toward a state of dynamic, functional synergy and inclusive governance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 108349"},"PeriodicalIF":12.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925526000235","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explores the conceptual and practical expansion of industrial symbiosis (IS) to the realm of industry-city integration (ICI), and further proposes industry-city co-prosperity as a new paradigm for sustainable urban-industrial development. A systematic literature review was conducted. This review analyzed 132 selected studies to trace the evolution from firm-centered IS network to multi-scalar urban-industrial synergies. The results indicate that traditional IS, while successful in enabling resource-sharing among firms, remains limited by spatial confinement and administrative boundaries. ICI bridges this gap by redefining the city as a functional node of industrial and talent chains, extending symbiotic practices to cross-regional metabolic flows and social integration. A typology of three distinct governance models for ICI (Top-Down Planning, Self-Organizing, and Government-Promotion) is developed and a multi-dimensional comparative analysis of international cases under each model is conducted. The findings reveal that no single model is sufficient; instead, a hybrid governance architecture is essential to overcome administrative silos and foster emerging circular service industries. The paper concludes that aligning industrial development with urban sustainability requires moving beyond resource efficiency toward a state of dynamic, functional synergy and inclusive governance.
从共生到共同繁荣:重新定义工业-城市融合以增强城市韧性
本文探讨了产业共生(IS)的概念和实践扩展到产城融合(ICI)领域,并进一步提出了产城共荣作为城市-工业可持续发展的新范式。进行了系统的文献综述。本文通过对132项研究的分析,追溯了从以企业为中心的信息系统网络到多尺度城市-产业协同效应的演变过程。结果表明,传统的信息系统虽然能够成功地实现企业间的资源共享,但仍然受到空间限制和行政边界的限制。ICI通过将城市重新定义为工业和人才链的功能节点,将共生实践扩展到跨区域的代谢流动和社会融合,弥合了这一差距。本文对ICI的三种不同的治理模式(自上而下的规划、自组织和政府促进)进行了分类,并对每种模式下的国际案例进行了多维度的比较分析。研究结果表明,没有一个单一的模型是充分的;相反,混合治理架构对于克服管理孤岛和培育新兴的循环服务行业至关重要。本文的结论是,将工业发展与城市可持续发展相结合,需要超越资源效率,走向动态、功能协同和包容性治理的状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书