Does social stability risk assessment improve social governance level in China?

IF 12.2 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Environmental Impact Assessment Review Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-19 DOI:10.1016/j.eiar.2026.108342
Luming Yan , Ruilian Zhang , Ming Ji , Yujian Li
{"title":"Does social stability risk assessment improve social governance level in China?","authors":"Luming Yan ,&nbsp;Ruilian Zhang ,&nbsp;Ming Ji ,&nbsp;Yujian Li","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2026.108342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the impact of China's Social Stability Risk Assessment (SSRA) policy on the effectiveness of social governance. By analyzing policy implementation across various administrative regions and evaluating governance outcomes using a comprehensive index framework, the paper assesses whether SSRA contributes to proactive conflict resolution, enhanced public participation, and improved administrative coordination. Empirical evidence from regional case studies and statistical analyses suggests that the SSRA policy positively correlates with improvements in social governance, particularly in regions with strong institutional capacities and transparent risk evaluation mechanisms. However, the policy's effectiveness is uneven across jurisdictions, highlighting the importance of local governance conditions and policy enforcement quality. The findings offer insights into the role of preventive governance tools in maintaining social stability and enhancing state-society relations in transitional governance contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 108342"},"PeriodicalIF":12.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925526000168","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of China's Social Stability Risk Assessment (SSRA) policy on the effectiveness of social governance. By analyzing policy implementation across various administrative regions and evaluating governance outcomes using a comprehensive index framework, the paper assesses whether SSRA contributes to proactive conflict resolution, enhanced public participation, and improved administrative coordination. Empirical evidence from regional case studies and statistical analyses suggests that the SSRA policy positively correlates with improvements in social governance, particularly in regions with strong institutional capacities and transparent risk evaluation mechanisms. However, the policy's effectiveness is uneven across jurisdictions, highlighting the importance of local governance conditions and policy enforcement quality. The findings offer insights into the role of preventive governance tools in maintaining social stability and enhancing state-society relations in transitional governance contexts.
社会稳定风险评估是否提高了中国的社会治理水平?
本研究探讨中国社会稳定风险评估(SSRA)政策对社会治理有效性的影响。通过分析不同行政区域的政策实施情况,并使用综合指标框架评估治理结果,本文评估了SSRA是否有助于主动解决冲突、增强公众参与和改善行政协调。来自区域案例研究和统计分析的经验证据表明,SSRA政策与社会治理的改善呈正相关,特别是在具有强大体制能力和透明风险评估机制的区域。然而,该政策在不同司法管辖区的有效性参差不齐,这凸显了地方治理条件和政策执行质量的重要性。研究结果对预防性治理工具在过渡治理背景下维持社会稳定和加强国家-社会关系方面的作用提供了深入的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书