Entrustable Professional Activities for Newly Graduated Physician Associates: Validation Through a Modified Delphi Study.

Q2 Health Professions
David J Bunnell
{"title":"Entrustable Professional Activities for Newly Graduated Physician Associates: Validation Through a Modified Delphi Study.","authors":"David J Bunnell","doi":"10.1097/JPA.0000000000000738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) operationalize Competency-Based Medical Education (CBME) by defining observable clinical tasks that learners should be trusted to perform. Although EPA frameworks have been developed for physician training, a validated EPA framework tailored to newly graduated physician associates (PAs) has not been established.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A modified Delphi study was conducted with 35 experts from PA education and clinical practice. An initial list of 21 EPAs was created through adaptation of existing EPA frameworks and original development aligned with the 2020 PA Competencies. Each EPA was evaluated using the Queen's EPA Quality rubric. Three iterative survey rounds were conducted using Qualtrics. EPAs reaching ≥75% expert consensus were retained. Qualitative feedback was used to refine EPA language between rounds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve EPAs met the consensus threshold, with all ultimately reaching \"Strongly Agree\" levels. These were categorized into 5 domains: Establishing Core Clinical Skills, Developing Critical Thinking with Reflective Practice, Developing Interconnected Clinical Skills, Proactive Patient Care Skills, and Enhancing Communication and Cultural Awareness. Participants represented a diverse range of roles, specialties, and geographic regions.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study provides a validated, profession-specific EPA framework for PA graduates. The 12 EPAs align with CBME principles, accreditation standards, and national PA competencies. They offer a structured approach to readiness-to-practice assessment, curriculum development, and faculty training. Future research should evaluate implementation, impact on clinical outcomes, and implications for certification and licensure.</p>","PeriodicalId":39231,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physician Assistant Education","volume":" ","pages":"231-238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physician Assistant Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPA.0000000000000738","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) operationalize Competency-Based Medical Education (CBME) by defining observable clinical tasks that learners should be trusted to perform. Although EPA frameworks have been developed for physician training, a validated EPA framework tailored to newly graduated physician associates (PAs) has not been established.

Methods: A modified Delphi study was conducted with 35 experts from PA education and clinical practice. An initial list of 21 EPAs was created through adaptation of existing EPA frameworks and original development aligned with the 2020 PA Competencies. Each EPA was evaluated using the Queen's EPA Quality rubric. Three iterative survey rounds were conducted using Qualtrics. EPAs reaching ≥75% expert consensus were retained. Qualitative feedback was used to refine EPA language between rounds.

Results: Twelve EPAs met the consensus threshold, with all ultimately reaching "Strongly Agree" levels. These were categorized into 5 domains: Establishing Core Clinical Skills, Developing Critical Thinking with Reflective Practice, Developing Interconnected Clinical Skills, Proactive Patient Care Skills, and Enhancing Communication and Cultural Awareness. Participants represented a diverse range of roles, specialties, and geographic regions.

Discussion: This study provides a validated, profession-specific EPA framework for PA graduates. The 12 EPAs align with CBME principles, accreditation standards, and national PA competencies. They offer a structured approach to readiness-to-practice assessment, curriculum development, and faculty training. Future research should evaluate implementation, impact on clinical outcomes, and implications for certification and licensure.

新毕业医师助理可信赖的专业活动:通过修正德尔菲研究的验证。
简介:可信赖的专业活动(EPAs)通过定义学习者应该被信任执行的可观察的临床任务来实现基于能力的医学教育(CBME)。虽然EPA框架已经发展为医生培训,一个有效的EPA框架量身定制的新毕业的医师助理(PAs)尚未建立。方法:采用修正德尔菲法对35名PA教育和临床实践专家进行调查。通过对现有EPA框架的调整和与2020年EPA能力相一致的原始开发,创建了21个EPA的初始清单。每个EPA都使用女王EPA质量标准进行评估。使用质量进行了三轮迭代调查。专家共识≥75%的EPAs被保留。定性反馈用于改进各轮之间的EPA语言。结果:12个epa达到了共识阈值,最终都达到了“非常同意”的水平。这些目标被分为5个领域:建立核心临床技能、通过反思性实践培养批判性思维、培养相互关联的临床技能、积极主动的病人护理技能、增强沟通和文化意识。参与者代表了不同的角色、专业和地理区域。讨论:本研究为PA毕业生提供了一个有效的、专业的EPA框架。12个epa与CBME原则、认证标准和国家PA能力保持一致。他们提供了一种结构化的方法来进行实践准备评估、课程开发和教师培训。未来的研究应评估实施、对临床结果的影响以及对认证和许可的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书