Predictive Utility of Cerebral Blood Flow Transients in Experimental Stroke.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Janos Lückl, Monika Szücs, Ferenc Rarosi, Amirhossein Salehzadeh, Jens P Dreier
{"title":"Predictive Utility of Cerebral Blood Flow Transients in Experimental Stroke.","authors":"Janos Lückl, Monika Szücs, Ferenc Rarosi, Amirhossein Salehzadeh, Jens P Dreier","doi":"10.1007/s12975-025-01410-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A gap in developing novel preclinical treatment strategies for ischemic stroke is predicting long-term outcome in experimental stroke models early during ischemia to reduce heterogeneity and sample size. Besides saving costs through improved risk stratification, reducing the number of animals is a requirement of the 3Rs principle. In this secondary analysis, we analyzed 28 Sprague-Dawley rats of a prospective data base that underwent 90-minute filament-occlusion of the middle cerebral artery (MCAO) to assess the predictive power of early variables at 30, 60, and 90 min after occlusion. The animals were sacrificed after 72 h. Infarct sizes were determined by hematoxylin staining. In a minimally invasive fashion, we recorded cerebral blood flow (CBF) with laser-Doppler flowmetry and direct current (DC)/alternating current-electrocorticography (ECoG) with epidural Ag/AgCl electrodes. Both CBF and ECoG markers correlated with the cortical infarct volumes. Multiclass receiver operating characteristic analysis identified the best predictors of three risk classes, and Spearman's rank correlation was used to explore relationships between ECoG and CBF. The slope of the CBF transients in response to spreading depolarization (SD) was the best biomarker at all time points, while the DC integral was the best epidural biomarker. Both correlated negatively at all time points (ρ < -0.68). In summary, we have found that early risk stratification during MCAO in rats is possible using minimally invasive biomarkers. This would enable, in particular, the early sorting out of animals with a low risk of cortical infarction in neuroprotection studies, where these animals typically distort the statistical results.</p>","PeriodicalId":23237,"journal":{"name":"Translational Stroke Research","volume":"17 1","pages":"19"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12823744/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Stroke Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-025-01410-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A gap in developing novel preclinical treatment strategies for ischemic stroke is predicting long-term outcome in experimental stroke models early during ischemia to reduce heterogeneity and sample size. Besides saving costs through improved risk stratification, reducing the number of animals is a requirement of the 3Rs principle. In this secondary analysis, we analyzed 28 Sprague-Dawley rats of a prospective data base that underwent 90-minute filament-occlusion of the middle cerebral artery (MCAO) to assess the predictive power of early variables at 30, 60, and 90 min after occlusion. The animals were sacrificed after 72 h. Infarct sizes were determined by hematoxylin staining. In a minimally invasive fashion, we recorded cerebral blood flow (CBF) with laser-Doppler flowmetry and direct current (DC)/alternating current-electrocorticography (ECoG) with epidural Ag/AgCl electrodes. Both CBF and ECoG markers correlated with the cortical infarct volumes. Multiclass receiver operating characteristic analysis identified the best predictors of three risk classes, and Spearman's rank correlation was used to explore relationships between ECoG and CBF. The slope of the CBF transients in response to spreading depolarization (SD) was the best biomarker at all time points, while the DC integral was the best epidural biomarker. Both correlated negatively at all time points (ρ < -0.68). In summary, we have found that early risk stratification during MCAO in rats is possible using minimally invasive biomarkers. This would enable, in particular, the early sorting out of animals with a low risk of cortical infarction in neuroprotection studies, where these animals typically distort the statistical results.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

脑血流瞬变在实验性脑卒中中的预测应用。
在缺血性脑卒中的临床前治疗策略开发方面的一个空白是在缺血早期预测实验性脑卒中模型的长期结果,以减少异质性和样本量。除了通过改善风险分层来节省成本外,减少动物数量也是3r原则的要求。在这一次要分析中,我们分析了28只前瞻性数据库中的Sprague-Dawley大鼠,这些大鼠接受了大脑中动脉(MCAO) 90分钟的细丝闭塞,以评估闭塞后30、60和90分钟早期变量的预测能力。72h后处死。苏木精染色测定梗死面积。在微创方式下,我们使用激光多普勒血流仪和硬膜外Ag/AgCl电极的直流(DC)/交流电皮质电图(ECoG)记录脑血流量(CBF)。CBF和ECoG指标均与皮质梗死体积相关。多类别受者工作特征分析确定了三个风险类别的最佳预测因子,并使用Spearman等级相关来探索ECoG和CBF之间的关系。各时间点CBF斜率是最好的生物标志物,而DC积分是最好的硬膜外生物标志物。两者在各时间点均呈负相关(ρ < -0.68)。总之,我们发现使用微创生物标志物可以在大鼠MCAO期间进行早期风险分层。这将使,特别是,在神经保护研究中早期分类出具有低皮质梗死风险的动物,这些动物通常会扭曲统计结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Translational Stroke Research
Translational Stroke Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
130
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Translational Stroke Research covers basic, translational, and clinical studies. The Journal emphasizes novel approaches to help both to understand clinical phenomenon through basic science tools, and to translate basic science discoveries into the development of new strategies for the prevention, assessment, treatment, and enhancement of central nervous system repair after stroke and other forms of neurotrauma. Translational Stroke Research focuses on translational research and is relevant to both basic scientists and physicians, including but not restricted to neuroscientists, vascular biologists, neurologists, neuroimagers, and neurosurgeons.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书