Taichi Goto, Joy D Kreskow, Alexander L R Ross, Catherine L Blumhorst, Justin J Zhao, Andrew J Mannes, Miroslav Bačkonja, Carlos A Zarate, Leorey N Saligan
{"title":"A preliminary proof-of-concept trial on the effects of ketamine on fatigue: a randomized crossover trial.","authors":"Taichi Goto, Joy D Kreskow, Alexander L R Ross, Catherine L Blumhorst, Justin J Zhao, Andrew J Mannes, Miroslav Bačkonja, Carlos A Zarate, Leorey N Saligan","doi":"10.1007/s43440-025-00808-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fatigue, a prevalent symptom of chronic illness, impacts quality of life. This proof-of-concept, randomized, double-blind, crossover trial assessed the anti-fatigue effects of ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) versus midazolam (0.045 mg/kg), the active comparator.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten participants, who were cancer survivors, with fibromyalgia, myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome, or systemic lupus erythematosus, were randomized into Arm 1 (n = 4, Period 1: ketamine to Period 2: midazolam) or Arm 2 (n = 6, Period 1: midazolam to Period 2: ketamine).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two periods were separately analyzed because of carryover effects with baseline fatigue scores, assessed by the fatigue visual analog scale (VAS), between the study periods (p = 0.03). Looking at changes in fatigue VAS scores from baseline (pre-infusion) to 3 days post-infusion, the ketamine group had a 21.0% decrease in Period 1 and 10.9% in Period 2, while the midazolam group showed a 17.7% decrease in Period 1 and 12.6% in Period 2. We did not observe a statistically significant difference in both periods. The largest fatigue score reduction for the ketamine group was at 1 day post-infusion, at - 38.7% in Period 1.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite no statistical significance, a reduction in real-time fatigue scores was observed, which exceeded the 20% efficacy threshold, the primary outcome, in the ketamine arm from pre-infusion to 3 days post-infusion. The carryover effects and the peak reduction in fatigue at 24 hours after ketamine administration suggest that future trials may need to consider a study design without cross-over and an optimal active placebo alternative.</p>","PeriodicalId":19947,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacological Reports","volume":" ","pages":"558-567"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43440-025-00808-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Fatigue, a prevalent symptom of chronic illness, impacts quality of life. This proof-of-concept, randomized, double-blind, crossover trial assessed the anti-fatigue effects of ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) versus midazolam (0.045 mg/kg), the active comparator.
Methods: Ten participants, who were cancer survivors, with fibromyalgia, myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome, or systemic lupus erythematosus, were randomized into Arm 1 (n = 4, Period 1: ketamine to Period 2: midazolam) or Arm 2 (n = 6, Period 1: midazolam to Period 2: ketamine).
Results: The two periods were separately analyzed because of carryover effects with baseline fatigue scores, assessed by the fatigue visual analog scale (VAS), between the study periods (p = 0.03). Looking at changes in fatigue VAS scores from baseline (pre-infusion) to 3 days post-infusion, the ketamine group had a 21.0% decrease in Period 1 and 10.9% in Period 2, while the midazolam group showed a 17.7% decrease in Period 1 and 12.6% in Period 2. We did not observe a statistically significant difference in both periods. The largest fatigue score reduction for the ketamine group was at 1 day post-infusion, at - 38.7% in Period 1.
Conclusion: Despite no statistical significance, a reduction in real-time fatigue scores was observed, which exceeded the 20% efficacy threshold, the primary outcome, in the ketamine arm from pre-infusion to 3 days post-infusion. The carryover effects and the peak reduction in fatigue at 24 hours after ketamine administration suggest that future trials may need to consider a study design without cross-over and an optimal active placebo alternative.
期刊介绍:
Pharmacological Reports publishes articles concerning all aspects of pharmacology, dealing with the action of drugs at a cellular and molecular level, and papers on the relationship between molecular structure and biological activity as well as reports on compounds with well-defined chemical structures.
Pharmacological Reports is an open forum to disseminate recent developments in: pharmacology, behavioural brain research, evidence-based complementary biochemical pharmacology, medicinal chemistry and biochemistry, drug discovery, neuro-psychopharmacology and biological psychiatry, neuroscience and neuropharmacology, cellular and molecular neuroscience, molecular biology, cell biology, toxicology.
Studies of plant extracts are not suitable for Pharmacological Reports.