A preliminary proof-of-concept trial on the effects of ketamine on fatigue: a randomized crossover trial.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Pharmacological Reports Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-22 DOI:10.1007/s43440-025-00808-4
Taichi Goto, Joy D Kreskow, Alexander L R Ross, Catherine L Blumhorst, Justin J Zhao, Andrew J Mannes, Miroslav Bačkonja, Carlos A Zarate, Leorey N Saligan
{"title":"A preliminary proof-of-concept trial on the effects of ketamine on fatigue: a randomized crossover trial.","authors":"Taichi Goto, Joy D Kreskow, Alexander L R Ross, Catherine L Blumhorst, Justin J Zhao, Andrew J Mannes, Miroslav Bačkonja, Carlos A Zarate, Leorey N Saligan","doi":"10.1007/s43440-025-00808-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fatigue, a prevalent symptom of chronic illness, impacts quality of life. This proof-of-concept, randomized, double-blind, crossover trial assessed the anti-fatigue effects of ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) versus midazolam (0.045 mg/kg), the active comparator.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten participants, who were cancer survivors, with fibromyalgia, myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome, or systemic lupus erythematosus, were randomized into Arm 1 (n = 4, Period 1: ketamine to Period 2: midazolam) or Arm 2 (n = 6, Period 1: midazolam to Period 2: ketamine).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two periods were separately analyzed because of carryover effects with baseline fatigue scores, assessed by the fatigue visual analog scale (VAS), between the study periods (p = 0.03). Looking at changes in fatigue VAS scores from baseline (pre-infusion) to 3 days post-infusion, the ketamine group had a 21.0% decrease in Period 1 and 10.9% in Period 2, while the midazolam group showed a 17.7% decrease in Period 1 and 12.6% in Period 2. We did not observe a statistically significant difference in both periods. The largest fatigue score reduction for the ketamine group was at 1 day post-infusion, at - 38.7% in Period 1.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite no statistical significance, a reduction in real-time fatigue scores was observed, which exceeded the 20% efficacy threshold, the primary outcome, in the ketamine arm from pre-infusion to 3 days post-infusion. The carryover effects and the peak reduction in fatigue at 24 hours after ketamine administration suggest that future trials may need to consider a study design without cross-over and an optimal active placebo alternative.</p>","PeriodicalId":19947,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacological Reports","volume":" ","pages":"558-567"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43440-025-00808-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fatigue, a prevalent symptom of chronic illness, impacts quality of life. This proof-of-concept, randomized, double-blind, crossover trial assessed the anti-fatigue effects of ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) versus midazolam (0.045 mg/kg), the active comparator.

Methods: Ten participants, who were cancer survivors, with fibromyalgia, myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome, or systemic lupus erythematosus, were randomized into Arm 1 (n = 4, Period 1: ketamine to Period 2: midazolam) or Arm 2 (n = 6, Period 1: midazolam to Period 2: ketamine).

Results: The two periods were separately analyzed because of carryover effects with baseline fatigue scores, assessed by the fatigue visual analog scale (VAS), between the study periods (p = 0.03). Looking at changes in fatigue VAS scores from baseline (pre-infusion) to 3 days post-infusion, the ketamine group had a 21.0% decrease in Period 1 and 10.9% in Period 2, while the midazolam group showed a 17.7% decrease in Period 1 and 12.6% in Period 2. We did not observe a statistically significant difference in both periods. The largest fatigue score reduction for the ketamine group was at 1 day post-infusion, at - 38.7% in Period 1.

Conclusion: Despite no statistical significance, a reduction in real-time fatigue scores was observed, which exceeded the 20% efficacy threshold, the primary outcome, in the ketamine arm from pre-infusion to 3 days post-infusion. The carryover effects and the peak reduction in fatigue at 24 hours after ketamine administration suggest that future trials may need to consider a study design without cross-over and an optimal active placebo alternative.

氯胺酮对疲劳影响的初步概念验证试验:一项随机交叉试验。
背景:疲劳是慢性疾病的普遍症状,影响生活质量。这项概念验证、随机、双盲、交叉试验评估了氯胺酮(0.5 mg/kg)与咪达唑仑(0.045 mg/kg)的抗疲劳效果。方法:10名患有纤维肌痛、肌痛性脑脊髓炎/慢性疲劳综合征或系统性红斑狼疮的癌症幸存者被随机分为1组(n = 4,第1期:氯胺酮至第2期:咪达唑仑)或2组(n = 6,第1期:咪达唑仑至第2期:氯胺酮)。结果:由于研究期间的疲劳视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估基线疲劳评分的遗留效应,两个研究期间分别进行分析(p = 0.03)。观察疲劳VAS评分从基线(输注前)到输注后3天的变化,氯胺酮组在第1期下降21.0%,第2期下降10.9%,而咪达唑仑组在第1期下降17.7%,第2期下降12.6%。我们没有观察到两个时期的统计学差异。氯胺酮组在输注后1天疲劳评分下降幅度最大,在第1期为- 38.7%。结论:氯胺酮组从输注前到输注后3天,实时疲劳评分下降,超过20%的疗效阈值(主要结局),尽管无统计学意义。服用氯胺酮后24小时内的携带效应和疲劳峰值减少表明,未来的试验可能需要考虑无交叉的研究设计和最佳的活性安慰剂替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmacological Reports
Pharmacological Reports 医学-药学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Pharmacological Reports publishes articles concerning all aspects of pharmacology, dealing with the action of drugs at a cellular and molecular level, and papers on the relationship between molecular structure and biological activity as well as reports on compounds with well-defined chemical structures. Pharmacological Reports is an open forum to disseminate recent developments in: pharmacology, behavioural brain research, evidence-based complementary biochemical pharmacology, medicinal chemistry and biochemistry, drug discovery, neuro-psychopharmacology and biological psychiatry, neuroscience and neuropharmacology, cellular and molecular neuroscience, molecular biology, cell biology, toxicology. Studies of plant extracts are not suitable for Pharmacological Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书