Thought suppression worsens mood and obsessions but improves them subsequently: First evidence of a contrast avoidance effect for the maintenance of thought suppression

IF 4.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Behaviour Research and Therapy Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-12 DOI:10.1016/j.brat.2026.104961
Valerie S. Swisher, Michelle G. Newman
{"title":"Thought suppression worsens mood and obsessions but improves them subsequently: First evidence of a contrast avoidance effect for the maintenance of thought suppression","authors":"Valerie S. Swisher,&nbsp;Michelle G. Newman","doi":"10.1016/j.brat.2026.104961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The cognitive behavioral model for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) suggests that suppression of unwanted thoughts (TS) is negatively reinforced by temporarily preventing obsessions and reducing distress. It further suggests that ceasing TS subsequently creates a rebound effect leading to increased obsessions/distress. However, the contrast avoidance model (CAM) suggests that TS concurrently increases and then sustains obsessions/negative affect, thus increasing the likelihood of negative and positive reinforcement (positive contrast) and avoiding a negative contrast later. We tested these theories using intensive ecological momentary assessment.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Forty-nine individuals diagnosed with OCD received seven prompts/day for seven days examining current obsessions, TS, negative and positive mood.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In line with CAM, higher TS was associated with higher concurrent negative mood and obsessions. Also, higher TS was associated with decreased obsessions and negative mood and increased positive mood 2 h later. Lower TS was associated with lower negative mood and obsessions concurrently and increased negative mood 2 h later. Thus, TS may have been negatively and positively reinforced—through subsequent (as opposed to concurrent) reduced negative mood and increased positive mood—and not engaging in prior TS was punished, such that it was associated with a subsequent uptick in negative mood.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Taken together, the present study showed the first evidence for a contrast avoidance effect (i.e., avoidance of sharp increases in negative emotion and decreases in positive emotion) for the maintenance of TS in OCD. Results suggest that targeting contrast avoidance may help reduce maladaptive cognitive strategies such as TS in OCD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48457,"journal":{"name":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"197 ","pages":"Article 104961"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005796726000136","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The cognitive behavioral model for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) suggests that suppression of unwanted thoughts (TS) is negatively reinforced by temporarily preventing obsessions and reducing distress. It further suggests that ceasing TS subsequently creates a rebound effect leading to increased obsessions/distress. However, the contrast avoidance model (CAM) suggests that TS concurrently increases and then sustains obsessions/negative affect, thus increasing the likelihood of negative and positive reinforcement (positive contrast) and avoiding a negative contrast later. We tested these theories using intensive ecological momentary assessment.

Method

Forty-nine individuals diagnosed with OCD received seven prompts/day for seven days examining current obsessions, TS, negative and positive mood.

Results

In line with CAM, higher TS was associated with higher concurrent negative mood and obsessions. Also, higher TS was associated with decreased obsessions and negative mood and increased positive mood 2 h later. Lower TS was associated with lower negative mood and obsessions concurrently and increased negative mood 2 h later. Thus, TS may have been negatively and positively reinforced—through subsequent (as opposed to concurrent) reduced negative mood and increased positive mood—and not engaging in prior TS was punished, such that it was associated with a subsequent uptick in negative mood.

Conclusion

Taken together, the present study showed the first evidence for a contrast avoidance effect (i.e., avoidance of sharp increases in negative emotion and decreases in positive emotion) for the maintenance of TS in OCD. Results suggest that targeting contrast avoidance may help reduce maladaptive cognitive strategies such as TS in OCD.
思想抑制会使情绪和强迫症恶化,但随后会改善它们:第一个证据表明,维持思想抑制存在对比回避效应。
目的:强迫症(OCD)的认知行为模型表明,抑制不想要的想法(TS)通过暂时阻止强迫和减少痛苦而负向强化。它进一步表明,随后停止TS会产生反弹效应,导致强迫症/痛苦增加。然而,对比回避模型(CAM)表明,TS同时增加并维持了强迫/消极影响,从而增加了消极强化和积极强化(积极对比)的可能性,并避免了随后的消极对比。我们使用密集的生态瞬时评估来检验这些理论。方法:49名被诊断为强迫症的个体在7天内每天接受7次提示,检查当前的强迫行为、TS、消极和积极情绪。结果:与CAM一致,较高的TS与较高的并发负性情绪和强迫相关。此外,较高的TS与强迫症和消极情绪的减少以及2小时后积极情绪的增加有关。较低的TS与较低的负性情绪和强迫症同时相关,并在2小时后增加负性情绪。因此,TS可能通过随后的(而不是同时的)消极情绪的减少和积极情绪的增加而被消极和积极地强化,而不参与先前的TS则受到惩罚,因此它与随后的消极情绪上升有关。结论:综上所述,本研究首次证明了对比回避效应(即回避消极情绪的急剧增加和积极情绪的急剧减少)对强迫症患者TS维持的影响。结果表明,针对对比回避可能有助于减少强迫症患者的认知策略失调,如TS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Behaviour Research and Therapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.30%
发文量
148
期刊介绍: The major focus of Behaviour Research and Therapy is an experimental psychopathology approach to understanding emotional and behavioral disorders and their prevention and treatment, using cognitive, behavioral, and psychophysiological (including neural) methods and models. This includes laboratory-based experimental studies with healthy, at risk and subclinical individuals that inform clinical application as well as studies with clinically severe samples. The following types of submissions are encouraged: theoretical reviews of mechanisms that contribute to psychopathology and that offer new treatment targets; tests of novel, mechanistically focused psychological interventions, especially ones that include theory-driven or experimentally-derived predictors, moderators and mediators; and innovations in dissemination and implementation of evidence-based practices into clinical practice in psychology and associated fields, especially those that target underlying mechanisms or focus on novel approaches to treatment delivery. In addition to traditional psychological disorders, the scope of the journal includes behavioural medicine (e.g., chronic pain). The journal will not consider manuscripts dealing primarily with measurement, psychometric analyses, and personality assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书