Hong-My Nguyen , Britteny Cassaidy , Mark Collinge , James C. Hickey , Jin Li , Amir Arellano-Saab , Steven W. Kumpf , Mitchell Thorn
{"title":"Inhibition of RNase L enhances the expression efficiency of mRNA-LNPs","authors":"Hong-My Nguyen , Britteny Cassaidy , Mark Collinge , James C. Hickey , Jin Li , Amir Arellano-Saab , Steven W. Kumpf , Mitchell Thorn","doi":"10.1016/j.molimm.2026.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>mRNA-LNPs offer a promising platform for therapeutic protein expression, however, achieving efficient and sustained translation remains a significant challenge. One of the major barriers to mRNA-LNP efficacy is the activation of innate immune responses that recognize foreign RNA and suppress subsequent protein synthesis. Among these, the OAS-RNase L pathway, involved in degradation of cytoplasmic mRNA, plays a key role. This study examined the impact of RNase L and RNase L blockade on mRNA-LNP expression efficiency. In THP-1 cells, which express high endogenous levels of RNase L, both genetic ablation and pharmacological inhibition of RNase L led to a marked increase in protein expression. In contrast, HeLa cells, which exhibit low RNase L expression, showed minimal response to RNase L inhibition. In human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), RNase L inhibition also enhanced mRNA expression, while blocking other RNA sensors such as TLR7/8, RIG-I, TLR3, or MAVS, did not. Activation of the OAS–RNase L pathway may be driven by double-stranded secondary structure formed by therapeutic mRNA, resulting in mRNA recognition and degradation. RNase L acts as a key post-transcriptional regulator of mRNA stability and translation. Targeting this pathway offers a strategy to improve the performance of mRNA-based therapeutics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18938,"journal":{"name":"Molecular immunology","volume":"190 ","pages":"Pages 101-109"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016158902600009X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
mRNA-LNPs offer a promising platform for therapeutic protein expression, however, achieving efficient and sustained translation remains a significant challenge. One of the major barriers to mRNA-LNP efficacy is the activation of innate immune responses that recognize foreign RNA and suppress subsequent protein synthesis. Among these, the OAS-RNase L pathway, involved in degradation of cytoplasmic mRNA, plays a key role. This study examined the impact of RNase L and RNase L blockade on mRNA-LNP expression efficiency. In THP-1 cells, which express high endogenous levels of RNase L, both genetic ablation and pharmacological inhibition of RNase L led to a marked increase in protein expression. In contrast, HeLa cells, which exhibit low RNase L expression, showed minimal response to RNase L inhibition. In human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), RNase L inhibition also enhanced mRNA expression, while blocking other RNA sensors such as TLR7/8, RIG-I, TLR3, or MAVS, did not. Activation of the OAS–RNase L pathway may be driven by double-stranded secondary structure formed by therapeutic mRNA, resulting in mRNA recognition and degradation. RNase L acts as a key post-transcriptional regulator of mRNA stability and translation. Targeting this pathway offers a strategy to improve the performance of mRNA-based therapeutics.
期刊介绍:
Molecular Immunology publishes original articles, reviews and commentaries on all areas of immunology, with a particular focus on description of cellular, biochemical or genetic mechanisms underlying immunological phenomena. Studies on all model organisms, from invertebrates to humans, are suitable. Examples include, but are not restricted to:
Infection, autoimmunity, transplantation, immunodeficiencies, inflammation and tumor immunology
Mechanisms of induction, regulation and termination of innate and adaptive immunity
Intercellular communication, cooperation and regulation
Intracellular mechanisms of immunity (endocytosis, protein trafficking, pathogen recognition, antigen presentation, etc)
Mechanisms of action of the cells and molecules of the immune system
Structural analysis
Development of the immune system
Comparative immunology and evolution of the immune system
"Omics" studies and bioinformatics
Vaccines, biotechnology and therapeutic manipulation of the immune system (therapeutic antibodies, cytokines, cellular therapies, etc)
Technical developments.