Exercise high-frequency QRS versus exercise stress electrocardiography in diagnosing myocardial ischemia: A meta-analysis

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Journal of electrocardiology Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-07 DOI:10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2026.154190
Zhewen Wang , Siteng Wang , Ming Liu , Dan Li , Jinsheng Hua , Xiangyong Kong , Hongwu Chen , Hao Hu , Chao Gao , Jianyuan Pan
{"title":"Exercise high-frequency QRS versus exercise stress electrocardiography in diagnosing myocardial ischemia: A meta-analysis","authors":"Zhewen Wang ,&nbsp;Siteng Wang ,&nbsp;Ming Liu ,&nbsp;Dan Li ,&nbsp;Jinsheng Hua ,&nbsp;Xiangyong Kong ,&nbsp;Hongwu Chen ,&nbsp;Hao Hu ,&nbsp;Chao Gao ,&nbsp;Jianyuan Pan","doi":"10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2026.154190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objects</h3><div>Exercise stress high-frequency QRS (ES-HFQRS) is a new non-invasive diagnostic technique mainly for myocardial ischemia, which has been demonstrated with favorable diagnostic efficacy in patients with early ischemic symptoms. Multiple studies confirmed ES-HFQRS's superior diagnostic performance over traditional exercise stress electrocardiography (EST) analysis. However, until now, there is still no meta-analysis that compares the diagnostic efficacy of ES-HFQRS and EST.Therefore, this meta aims to compare the diagnostic value of ES-HFQRS with EST.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Databases were searched up to August 4, 2025, using keywords including “exercise stress HFQRS” and “exercise stress electrocardiography”. Sensitivity and specificity were pooled using a bivariate random-effects model. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were plotted, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. Subgroup analyses and Meta-regression explored sources of heterogeneity.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Ten studies involving 3352 patients were included. The pooled sensitivity of ES-HFQRS was significantly higher than that of EST (65% [95% CI: 55%–73%] vs. 37% [95% CI: 29%–45%]; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), with no significant difference in specificity (78% [95% CI: 72%–83%] for HFQRS vs. 85% [95% CI: 78%–90%] for EST; <em>P</em> = 0.12). The AUCs of ES-HFQRS and EST were 0.77 and 0.64, respectively. Parallel test combining both methods achieved significantly higher sensitivity than EST alone (76% [95% CI: 69%–82%] vs. 37% [95% CI: 29%–45%]; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) while maintaining stable specificity at 64% (95% CI: 58%–70%). The serial test increased specificity to 96% (95% CI: 94%–97%),with a significantly lower sensitivity of 22% (95% CI: 17%–29%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ES-HFQRS had superior sensitivity to EST for the non-invasive diagnosis of myocardial ischemia. Combining both analytical methods flexibly could enhance the diagnostic value in the detection of myocardial ischemia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15606,"journal":{"name":"Journal of electrocardiology","volume":"95 ","pages":"Article 154190"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of electrocardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022073626000075","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objects

Exercise stress high-frequency QRS (ES-HFQRS) is a new non-invasive diagnostic technique mainly for myocardial ischemia, which has been demonstrated with favorable diagnostic efficacy in patients with early ischemic symptoms. Multiple studies confirmed ES-HFQRS's superior diagnostic performance over traditional exercise stress electrocardiography (EST) analysis. However, until now, there is still no meta-analysis that compares the diagnostic efficacy of ES-HFQRS and EST.Therefore, this meta aims to compare the diagnostic value of ES-HFQRS with EST.

Methods

Databases were searched up to August 4, 2025, using keywords including “exercise stress HFQRS” and “exercise stress electrocardiography”. Sensitivity and specificity were pooled using a bivariate random-effects model. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were plotted, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. Subgroup analyses and Meta-regression explored sources of heterogeneity.

Results

Ten studies involving 3352 patients were included. The pooled sensitivity of ES-HFQRS was significantly higher than that of EST (65% [95% CI: 55%–73%] vs. 37% [95% CI: 29%–45%]; P < 0.001), with no significant difference in specificity (78% [95% CI: 72%–83%] for HFQRS vs. 85% [95% CI: 78%–90%] for EST; P = 0.12). The AUCs of ES-HFQRS and EST were 0.77 and 0.64, respectively. Parallel test combining both methods achieved significantly higher sensitivity than EST alone (76% [95% CI: 69%–82%] vs. 37% [95% CI: 29%–45%]; P < 0.001) while maintaining stable specificity at 64% (95% CI: 58%–70%). The serial test increased specificity to 96% (95% CI: 94%–97%),with a significantly lower sensitivity of 22% (95% CI: 17%–29%).

Conclusion

ES-HFQRS had superior sensitivity to EST for the non-invasive diagnosis of myocardial ischemia. Combining both analytical methods flexibly could enhance the diagnostic value in the detection of myocardial ischemia.
运动高频QRS与运动应激心电图诊断心肌缺血:一项荟萃分析。
背景与目的:运动应激高频QRS (ES-HFQRS)是一种主要用于心肌缺血的新型无创诊断技术,已被证明对早期缺血症状患者具有良好的诊断效果。多项研究证实,ES-HFQRS的诊断性能优于传统的运动应激心电图(EST)分析。然而,到目前为止,还没有比较ES-HFQRS与est诊断效果的meta分析,因此,本meta旨在比较ES-HFQRS与est的诊断价值。方法:检索截至2025年8月4日的数据库,检索关键词为“运动应激HFQRS”和“运动应激心电图”。使用双变量随机效应模型对敏感性和特异性进行汇总。绘制总体受试者工作特征(SROC)曲线,计算曲线下面积(AUC)。亚组分析和元回归探讨了异质性的来源。结果:纳入10项研究,共3352例患者。ES-HFQRS的综合敏感性显著高于EST (65% [95% CI: 55% ~ 73%] vs. 37% [95% CI: 29% ~ 45%]; P结论:ES-HFQRS对EST无创诊断心肌缺血的敏感性优于EST。两种分析方法灵活结合,可提高心肌缺血的诊断价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of electrocardiology
Journal of electrocardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
152
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Electrocardiology is devoted exclusively to clinical and experimental studies of the electrical activities of the heart. It seeks to contribute significantly to the accuracy of diagnosis and prognosis and the effective treatment, prevention, or delay of heart disease. Editorial contents include electrocardiography, vectorcardiography, arrhythmias, membrane action potential, cardiac pacing, monitoring defibrillation, instrumentation, drug effects, and computer applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书