Zhewen Wang , Siteng Wang , Ming Liu , Dan Li , Jinsheng Hua , Xiangyong Kong , Hongwu Chen , Hao Hu , Chao Gao , Jianyuan Pan
{"title":"Exercise high-frequency QRS versus exercise stress electrocardiography in diagnosing myocardial ischemia: A meta-analysis","authors":"Zhewen Wang , Siteng Wang , Ming Liu , Dan Li , Jinsheng Hua , Xiangyong Kong , Hongwu Chen , Hao Hu , Chao Gao , Jianyuan Pan","doi":"10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2026.154190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objects</h3><div>Exercise stress high-frequency QRS (ES-HFQRS) is a new non-invasive diagnostic technique mainly for myocardial ischemia, which has been demonstrated with favorable diagnostic efficacy in patients with early ischemic symptoms. Multiple studies confirmed ES-HFQRS's superior diagnostic performance over traditional exercise stress electrocardiography (EST) analysis. However, until now, there is still no meta-analysis that compares the diagnostic efficacy of ES-HFQRS and EST.Therefore, this meta aims to compare the diagnostic value of ES-HFQRS with EST.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Databases were searched up to August 4, 2025, using keywords including “exercise stress HFQRS” and “exercise stress electrocardiography”. Sensitivity and specificity were pooled using a bivariate random-effects model. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were plotted, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. Subgroup analyses and Meta-regression explored sources of heterogeneity.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Ten studies involving 3352 patients were included. The pooled sensitivity of ES-HFQRS was significantly higher than that of EST (65% [95% CI: 55%–73%] vs. 37% [95% CI: 29%–45%]; <em>P</em> < 0.001), with no significant difference in specificity (78% [95% CI: 72%–83%] for HFQRS vs. 85% [95% CI: 78%–90%] for EST; <em>P</em> = 0.12). The AUCs of ES-HFQRS and EST were 0.77 and 0.64, respectively. Parallel test combining both methods achieved significantly higher sensitivity than EST alone (76% [95% CI: 69%–82%] vs. 37% [95% CI: 29%–45%]; <em>P</em> < 0.001) while maintaining stable specificity at 64% (95% CI: 58%–70%). The serial test increased specificity to 96% (95% CI: 94%–97%),with a significantly lower sensitivity of 22% (95% CI: 17%–29%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ES-HFQRS had superior sensitivity to EST for the non-invasive diagnosis of myocardial ischemia. Combining both analytical methods flexibly could enhance the diagnostic value in the detection of myocardial ischemia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15606,"journal":{"name":"Journal of electrocardiology","volume":"95 ","pages":"Article 154190"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of electrocardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022073626000075","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objects
Exercise stress high-frequency QRS (ES-HFQRS) is a new non-invasive diagnostic technique mainly for myocardial ischemia, which has been demonstrated with favorable diagnostic efficacy in patients with early ischemic symptoms. Multiple studies confirmed ES-HFQRS's superior diagnostic performance over traditional exercise stress electrocardiography (EST) analysis. However, until now, there is still no meta-analysis that compares the diagnostic efficacy of ES-HFQRS and EST.Therefore, this meta aims to compare the diagnostic value of ES-HFQRS with EST.
Methods
Databases were searched up to August 4, 2025, using keywords including “exercise stress HFQRS” and “exercise stress electrocardiography”. Sensitivity and specificity were pooled using a bivariate random-effects model. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were plotted, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. Subgroup analyses and Meta-regression explored sources of heterogeneity.
Results
Ten studies involving 3352 patients were included. The pooled sensitivity of ES-HFQRS was significantly higher than that of EST (65% [95% CI: 55%–73%] vs. 37% [95% CI: 29%–45%]; P < 0.001), with no significant difference in specificity (78% [95% CI: 72%–83%] for HFQRS vs. 85% [95% CI: 78%–90%] for EST; P = 0.12). The AUCs of ES-HFQRS and EST were 0.77 and 0.64, respectively. Parallel test combining both methods achieved significantly higher sensitivity than EST alone (76% [95% CI: 69%–82%] vs. 37% [95% CI: 29%–45%]; P < 0.001) while maintaining stable specificity at 64% (95% CI: 58%–70%). The serial test increased specificity to 96% (95% CI: 94%–97%),with a significantly lower sensitivity of 22% (95% CI: 17%–29%).
Conclusion
ES-HFQRS had superior sensitivity to EST for the non-invasive diagnosis of myocardial ischemia. Combining both analytical methods flexibly could enhance the diagnostic value in the detection of myocardial ischemia.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Electrocardiology is devoted exclusively to clinical and experimental studies of the electrical activities of the heart. It seeks to contribute significantly to the accuracy of diagnosis and prognosis and the effective treatment, prevention, or delay of heart disease. Editorial contents include electrocardiography, vectorcardiography, arrhythmias, membrane action potential, cardiac pacing, monitoring defibrillation, instrumentation, drug effects, and computer applications.